Cargando…
A new machine learning approach for predicting likelihood of recurrence following ablation for atrial fibrillation from CT
OBJECTIVE: To investigate left atrial shape differences on CT scans of atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with (AF+) versus without (AF−) post-ablation recurrence and whether these shape differences predict AF recurrence. METHODS: This retrospective study included 68 AF patients who had pre-catheter...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7941998/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33750343 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12880-021-00578-4 |
_version_ | 1783662229765226496 |
---|---|
author | Atta-Fosu, Thomas LaBarbera, Michael Ghose, Soumya Schoenhagen, Paul Saliba, Walid Tchou, Patrick J. Lindsay, Bruce D. Desai, Milind Y. Kwon, Deborah Chung, Mina K. Madabhushi, Anant |
author_facet | Atta-Fosu, Thomas LaBarbera, Michael Ghose, Soumya Schoenhagen, Paul Saliba, Walid Tchou, Patrick J. Lindsay, Bruce D. Desai, Milind Y. Kwon, Deborah Chung, Mina K. Madabhushi, Anant |
author_sort | Atta-Fosu, Thomas |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To investigate left atrial shape differences on CT scans of atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with (AF+) versus without (AF−) post-ablation recurrence and whether these shape differences predict AF recurrence. METHODS: This retrospective study included 68 AF patients who had pre-catheter ablation cardiac CT scans with contrast. AF recurrence was defined at 1 year, excluding a 3-month post-ablation blanking period. After creating atlases of atrial models from segmented AF+ and AF− CT images, an atlas-based implicit shape differentiation method was used to identify surface of interest (SOI). After registering the SOI to each patient model, statistics of the deformation on the SOI were used to create shape descriptors. The performance in predicting AF recurrence using shape features at and outside the SOI and eight clinical factors (age, sex, left atrial volume, left ventricular ejection fraction, body mass index, sinus rhythm, and AF type [persistent vs paroxysmal], catheter-ablation type [Cryoablation vs Irrigated RF]) were compared using 100 runs of fivefold cross validation. RESULTS: Differences in atrial shape were found surrounding the pulmonary vein ostia and the base of the left atrial appendage. In the prediction of AF recurrence, the area under the receiver-operating characteristics curve (AUC) was 0.67 for shape features from the SOI, 0.58 for shape features outside the SOI, 0.71 for the clinical parameters, and 0.78 combining shape and clinical features. CONCLUSION: Differences in left atrial shape were identified between AF recurrent and non-recurrent patients using pre-procedure CT scans. New radiomic features corresponding to the differences in shape were found to predict post-ablation AF recurrence. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7941998 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79419982021-03-10 A new machine learning approach for predicting likelihood of recurrence following ablation for atrial fibrillation from CT Atta-Fosu, Thomas LaBarbera, Michael Ghose, Soumya Schoenhagen, Paul Saliba, Walid Tchou, Patrick J. Lindsay, Bruce D. Desai, Milind Y. Kwon, Deborah Chung, Mina K. Madabhushi, Anant BMC Med Imaging Research Article OBJECTIVE: To investigate left atrial shape differences on CT scans of atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with (AF+) versus without (AF−) post-ablation recurrence and whether these shape differences predict AF recurrence. METHODS: This retrospective study included 68 AF patients who had pre-catheter ablation cardiac CT scans with contrast. AF recurrence was defined at 1 year, excluding a 3-month post-ablation blanking period. After creating atlases of atrial models from segmented AF+ and AF− CT images, an atlas-based implicit shape differentiation method was used to identify surface of interest (SOI). After registering the SOI to each patient model, statistics of the deformation on the SOI were used to create shape descriptors. The performance in predicting AF recurrence using shape features at and outside the SOI and eight clinical factors (age, sex, left atrial volume, left ventricular ejection fraction, body mass index, sinus rhythm, and AF type [persistent vs paroxysmal], catheter-ablation type [Cryoablation vs Irrigated RF]) were compared using 100 runs of fivefold cross validation. RESULTS: Differences in atrial shape were found surrounding the pulmonary vein ostia and the base of the left atrial appendage. In the prediction of AF recurrence, the area under the receiver-operating characteristics curve (AUC) was 0.67 for shape features from the SOI, 0.58 for shape features outside the SOI, 0.71 for the clinical parameters, and 0.78 combining shape and clinical features. CONCLUSION: Differences in left atrial shape were identified between AF recurrent and non-recurrent patients using pre-procedure CT scans. New radiomic features corresponding to the differences in shape were found to predict post-ablation AF recurrence. BioMed Central 2021-03-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7941998/ /pubmed/33750343 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12880-021-00578-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Atta-Fosu, Thomas LaBarbera, Michael Ghose, Soumya Schoenhagen, Paul Saliba, Walid Tchou, Patrick J. Lindsay, Bruce D. Desai, Milind Y. Kwon, Deborah Chung, Mina K. Madabhushi, Anant A new machine learning approach for predicting likelihood of recurrence following ablation for atrial fibrillation from CT |
title | A new machine learning approach for predicting likelihood of recurrence following ablation for atrial fibrillation from CT |
title_full | A new machine learning approach for predicting likelihood of recurrence following ablation for atrial fibrillation from CT |
title_fullStr | A new machine learning approach for predicting likelihood of recurrence following ablation for atrial fibrillation from CT |
title_full_unstemmed | A new machine learning approach for predicting likelihood of recurrence following ablation for atrial fibrillation from CT |
title_short | A new machine learning approach for predicting likelihood of recurrence following ablation for atrial fibrillation from CT |
title_sort | new machine learning approach for predicting likelihood of recurrence following ablation for atrial fibrillation from ct |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7941998/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33750343 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12880-021-00578-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT attafosuthomas anewmachinelearningapproachforpredictinglikelihoodofrecurrencefollowingablationforatrialfibrillationfromct AT labarberamichael anewmachinelearningapproachforpredictinglikelihoodofrecurrencefollowingablationforatrialfibrillationfromct AT ghosesoumya anewmachinelearningapproachforpredictinglikelihoodofrecurrencefollowingablationforatrialfibrillationfromct AT schoenhagenpaul anewmachinelearningapproachforpredictinglikelihoodofrecurrencefollowingablationforatrialfibrillationfromct AT salibawalid anewmachinelearningapproachforpredictinglikelihoodofrecurrencefollowingablationforatrialfibrillationfromct AT tchoupatrickj anewmachinelearningapproachforpredictinglikelihoodofrecurrencefollowingablationforatrialfibrillationfromct AT lindsaybruced anewmachinelearningapproachforpredictinglikelihoodofrecurrencefollowingablationforatrialfibrillationfromct AT desaimilindy anewmachinelearningapproachforpredictinglikelihoodofrecurrencefollowingablationforatrialfibrillationfromct AT kwondeborah anewmachinelearningapproachforpredictinglikelihoodofrecurrencefollowingablationforatrialfibrillationfromct AT chungminak anewmachinelearningapproachforpredictinglikelihoodofrecurrencefollowingablationforatrialfibrillationfromct AT madabhushianant anewmachinelearningapproachforpredictinglikelihoodofrecurrencefollowingablationforatrialfibrillationfromct AT attafosuthomas newmachinelearningapproachforpredictinglikelihoodofrecurrencefollowingablationforatrialfibrillationfromct AT labarberamichael newmachinelearningapproachforpredictinglikelihoodofrecurrencefollowingablationforatrialfibrillationfromct AT ghosesoumya newmachinelearningapproachforpredictinglikelihoodofrecurrencefollowingablationforatrialfibrillationfromct AT schoenhagenpaul newmachinelearningapproachforpredictinglikelihoodofrecurrencefollowingablationforatrialfibrillationfromct AT salibawalid newmachinelearningapproachforpredictinglikelihoodofrecurrencefollowingablationforatrialfibrillationfromct AT tchoupatrickj newmachinelearningapproachforpredictinglikelihoodofrecurrencefollowingablationforatrialfibrillationfromct AT lindsaybruced newmachinelearningapproachforpredictinglikelihoodofrecurrencefollowingablationforatrialfibrillationfromct AT desaimilindy newmachinelearningapproachforpredictinglikelihoodofrecurrencefollowingablationforatrialfibrillationfromct AT kwondeborah newmachinelearningapproachforpredictinglikelihoodofrecurrencefollowingablationforatrialfibrillationfromct AT chungminak newmachinelearningapproachforpredictinglikelihoodofrecurrencefollowingablationforatrialfibrillationfromct AT madabhushianant newmachinelearningapproachforpredictinglikelihoodofrecurrencefollowingablationforatrialfibrillationfromct |