Cargando…

A new machine learning approach for predicting likelihood of recurrence following ablation for atrial fibrillation from CT

OBJECTIVE: To investigate left atrial shape differences on CT scans of atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with (AF+) versus without (AF−) post-ablation recurrence and whether these shape differences predict AF recurrence. METHODS: This retrospective study included 68 AF patients who had pre-catheter...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Atta-Fosu, Thomas, LaBarbera, Michael, Ghose, Soumya, Schoenhagen, Paul, Saliba, Walid, Tchou, Patrick J., Lindsay, Bruce D., Desai, Milind Y., Kwon, Deborah, Chung, Mina K., Madabhushi, Anant
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7941998/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33750343
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12880-021-00578-4
_version_ 1783662229765226496
author Atta-Fosu, Thomas
LaBarbera, Michael
Ghose, Soumya
Schoenhagen, Paul
Saliba, Walid
Tchou, Patrick J.
Lindsay, Bruce D.
Desai, Milind Y.
Kwon, Deborah
Chung, Mina K.
Madabhushi, Anant
author_facet Atta-Fosu, Thomas
LaBarbera, Michael
Ghose, Soumya
Schoenhagen, Paul
Saliba, Walid
Tchou, Patrick J.
Lindsay, Bruce D.
Desai, Milind Y.
Kwon, Deborah
Chung, Mina K.
Madabhushi, Anant
author_sort Atta-Fosu, Thomas
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To investigate left atrial shape differences on CT scans of atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with (AF+) versus without (AF−) post-ablation recurrence and whether these shape differences predict AF recurrence. METHODS: This retrospective study included 68 AF patients who had pre-catheter ablation cardiac CT scans with contrast. AF recurrence was defined at 1 year, excluding a 3-month post-ablation blanking period. After creating atlases of atrial models from segmented AF+ and AF− CT images, an atlas-based implicit shape differentiation method was used to identify surface of interest (SOI). After registering the SOI to each patient model, statistics of the deformation on the SOI were used to create shape descriptors. The performance in predicting AF recurrence using shape features at and outside the SOI and eight clinical factors (age, sex, left atrial volume, left ventricular ejection fraction, body mass index, sinus rhythm, and AF type [persistent vs paroxysmal], catheter-ablation type [Cryoablation vs Irrigated RF]) were compared using 100 runs of fivefold cross validation. RESULTS: Differences in atrial shape were found surrounding the pulmonary vein ostia and the base of the left atrial appendage. In the prediction of AF recurrence, the area under the receiver-operating characteristics curve (AUC) was 0.67 for shape features from the SOI, 0.58 for shape features outside the SOI, 0.71 for the clinical parameters, and 0.78 combining shape and clinical features. CONCLUSION: Differences in left atrial shape were identified between AF recurrent and non-recurrent patients using pre-procedure CT scans. New radiomic features corresponding to the differences in shape were found to predict post-ablation AF recurrence.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7941998
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79419982021-03-10 A new machine learning approach for predicting likelihood of recurrence following ablation for atrial fibrillation from CT Atta-Fosu, Thomas LaBarbera, Michael Ghose, Soumya Schoenhagen, Paul Saliba, Walid Tchou, Patrick J. Lindsay, Bruce D. Desai, Milind Y. Kwon, Deborah Chung, Mina K. Madabhushi, Anant BMC Med Imaging Research Article OBJECTIVE: To investigate left atrial shape differences on CT scans of atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with (AF+) versus without (AF−) post-ablation recurrence and whether these shape differences predict AF recurrence. METHODS: This retrospective study included 68 AF patients who had pre-catheter ablation cardiac CT scans with contrast. AF recurrence was defined at 1 year, excluding a 3-month post-ablation blanking period. After creating atlases of atrial models from segmented AF+ and AF− CT images, an atlas-based implicit shape differentiation method was used to identify surface of interest (SOI). After registering the SOI to each patient model, statistics of the deformation on the SOI were used to create shape descriptors. The performance in predicting AF recurrence using shape features at and outside the SOI and eight clinical factors (age, sex, left atrial volume, left ventricular ejection fraction, body mass index, sinus rhythm, and AF type [persistent vs paroxysmal], catheter-ablation type [Cryoablation vs Irrigated RF]) were compared using 100 runs of fivefold cross validation. RESULTS: Differences in atrial shape were found surrounding the pulmonary vein ostia and the base of the left atrial appendage. In the prediction of AF recurrence, the area under the receiver-operating characteristics curve (AUC) was 0.67 for shape features from the SOI, 0.58 for shape features outside the SOI, 0.71 for the clinical parameters, and 0.78 combining shape and clinical features. CONCLUSION: Differences in left atrial shape were identified between AF recurrent and non-recurrent patients using pre-procedure CT scans. New radiomic features corresponding to the differences in shape were found to predict post-ablation AF recurrence. BioMed Central 2021-03-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7941998/ /pubmed/33750343 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12880-021-00578-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Atta-Fosu, Thomas
LaBarbera, Michael
Ghose, Soumya
Schoenhagen, Paul
Saliba, Walid
Tchou, Patrick J.
Lindsay, Bruce D.
Desai, Milind Y.
Kwon, Deborah
Chung, Mina K.
Madabhushi, Anant
A new machine learning approach for predicting likelihood of recurrence following ablation for atrial fibrillation from CT
title A new machine learning approach for predicting likelihood of recurrence following ablation for atrial fibrillation from CT
title_full A new machine learning approach for predicting likelihood of recurrence following ablation for atrial fibrillation from CT
title_fullStr A new machine learning approach for predicting likelihood of recurrence following ablation for atrial fibrillation from CT
title_full_unstemmed A new machine learning approach for predicting likelihood of recurrence following ablation for atrial fibrillation from CT
title_short A new machine learning approach for predicting likelihood of recurrence following ablation for atrial fibrillation from CT
title_sort new machine learning approach for predicting likelihood of recurrence following ablation for atrial fibrillation from ct
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7941998/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33750343
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12880-021-00578-4
work_keys_str_mv AT attafosuthomas anewmachinelearningapproachforpredictinglikelihoodofrecurrencefollowingablationforatrialfibrillationfromct
AT labarberamichael anewmachinelearningapproachforpredictinglikelihoodofrecurrencefollowingablationforatrialfibrillationfromct
AT ghosesoumya anewmachinelearningapproachforpredictinglikelihoodofrecurrencefollowingablationforatrialfibrillationfromct
AT schoenhagenpaul anewmachinelearningapproachforpredictinglikelihoodofrecurrencefollowingablationforatrialfibrillationfromct
AT salibawalid anewmachinelearningapproachforpredictinglikelihoodofrecurrencefollowingablationforatrialfibrillationfromct
AT tchoupatrickj anewmachinelearningapproachforpredictinglikelihoodofrecurrencefollowingablationforatrialfibrillationfromct
AT lindsaybruced anewmachinelearningapproachforpredictinglikelihoodofrecurrencefollowingablationforatrialfibrillationfromct
AT desaimilindy anewmachinelearningapproachforpredictinglikelihoodofrecurrencefollowingablationforatrialfibrillationfromct
AT kwondeborah anewmachinelearningapproachforpredictinglikelihoodofrecurrencefollowingablationforatrialfibrillationfromct
AT chungminak anewmachinelearningapproachforpredictinglikelihoodofrecurrencefollowingablationforatrialfibrillationfromct
AT madabhushianant anewmachinelearningapproachforpredictinglikelihoodofrecurrencefollowingablationforatrialfibrillationfromct
AT attafosuthomas newmachinelearningapproachforpredictinglikelihoodofrecurrencefollowingablationforatrialfibrillationfromct
AT labarberamichael newmachinelearningapproachforpredictinglikelihoodofrecurrencefollowingablationforatrialfibrillationfromct
AT ghosesoumya newmachinelearningapproachforpredictinglikelihoodofrecurrencefollowingablationforatrialfibrillationfromct
AT schoenhagenpaul newmachinelearningapproachforpredictinglikelihoodofrecurrencefollowingablationforatrialfibrillationfromct
AT salibawalid newmachinelearningapproachforpredictinglikelihoodofrecurrencefollowingablationforatrialfibrillationfromct
AT tchoupatrickj newmachinelearningapproachforpredictinglikelihoodofrecurrencefollowingablationforatrialfibrillationfromct
AT lindsaybruced newmachinelearningapproachforpredictinglikelihoodofrecurrencefollowingablationforatrialfibrillationfromct
AT desaimilindy newmachinelearningapproachforpredictinglikelihoodofrecurrencefollowingablationforatrialfibrillationfromct
AT kwondeborah newmachinelearningapproachforpredictinglikelihoodofrecurrencefollowingablationforatrialfibrillationfromct
AT chungminak newmachinelearningapproachforpredictinglikelihoodofrecurrencefollowingablationforatrialfibrillationfromct
AT madabhushianant newmachinelearningapproachforpredictinglikelihoodofrecurrencefollowingablationforatrialfibrillationfromct