Cargando…

Six years after manual small incision cataract surgery—Perspective from a secondary level eye hospital in Rural India

PURPOSE: We assessed the long-term impact of manual small incision cataract surgery (MSICS) in rural Central India using patient reported outcomes (PRO). METHODS: 841 patients undergoing MSICS by a single surgeon from January 2012 to July 2013 were included. The same patients were contacted telephon...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Sen, Alo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7942105/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33595481
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_1355_20
_version_ 1783662253155811328
author Sen, Alo
author_facet Sen, Alo
author_sort Sen, Alo
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: We assessed the long-term impact of manual small incision cataract surgery (MSICS) in rural Central India using patient reported outcomes (PRO). METHODS: 841 patients undergoing MSICS by a single surgeon from January 2012 to July 2013 were included. The same patients were contacted telephonically in November 2019 and were asked to report their perceived outcome of the cataract surgery. Data on the fellow eye status were also collected. These data were compared with objective data recorded at the time of surgery. RESULTS: The mean age was 61.53 ± 10.9 with 59% women. 96% had presenting visual acuity (VA) ≤5/60. 86% had visually significant cataract in the fellow eye; 2.5% were cataract blind. 85% had unaided VA ≥ 6/18 at 6 weeks. 223 patients were contactable by telephone after 6 years. 55 had expired and their relatives gave the information. Of these, 90% reported “good” outcome. PRO at 6 years and unaided VA at 6 weeks after surgery correlated significantly (P = 0.05). 40% had undergone cataract surgery of the fellow eye in the interim. Of those who reported “not good” outcome, 70% had undergone fellow eye surgery, compared with 38% in those who reported “good” outcome (P = 0.005). CONCLUSION: Telephonic PRO correlates with unaided VA 6 years after cataract surgery and could replace a follow-up visit. A PRO of poor vision in the already operated eye was the only factor correlating with fellow eye surgery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7942105
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79421052021-03-10 Six years after manual small incision cataract surgery—Perspective from a secondary level eye hospital in Rural India Sen, Alo Indian J Ophthalmol Original Article PURPOSE: We assessed the long-term impact of manual small incision cataract surgery (MSICS) in rural Central India using patient reported outcomes (PRO). METHODS: 841 patients undergoing MSICS by a single surgeon from January 2012 to July 2013 were included. The same patients were contacted telephonically in November 2019 and were asked to report their perceived outcome of the cataract surgery. Data on the fellow eye status were also collected. These data were compared with objective data recorded at the time of surgery. RESULTS: The mean age was 61.53 ± 10.9 with 59% women. 96% had presenting visual acuity (VA) ≤5/60. 86% had visually significant cataract in the fellow eye; 2.5% were cataract blind. 85% had unaided VA ≥ 6/18 at 6 weeks. 223 patients were contactable by telephone after 6 years. 55 had expired and their relatives gave the information. Of these, 90% reported “good” outcome. PRO at 6 years and unaided VA at 6 weeks after surgery correlated significantly (P = 0.05). 40% had undergone cataract surgery of the fellow eye in the interim. Of those who reported “not good” outcome, 70% had undergone fellow eye surgery, compared with 38% in those who reported “good” outcome (P = 0.005). CONCLUSION: Telephonic PRO correlates with unaided VA 6 years after cataract surgery and could replace a follow-up visit. A PRO of poor vision in the already operated eye was the only factor correlating with fellow eye surgery. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021-03 2021-02-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7942105/ /pubmed/33595481 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_1355_20 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Indian Journal of Ophthalmology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Sen, Alo
Six years after manual small incision cataract surgery—Perspective from a secondary level eye hospital in Rural India
title Six years after manual small incision cataract surgery—Perspective from a secondary level eye hospital in Rural India
title_full Six years after manual small incision cataract surgery—Perspective from a secondary level eye hospital in Rural India
title_fullStr Six years after manual small incision cataract surgery—Perspective from a secondary level eye hospital in Rural India
title_full_unstemmed Six years after manual small incision cataract surgery—Perspective from a secondary level eye hospital in Rural India
title_short Six years after manual small incision cataract surgery—Perspective from a secondary level eye hospital in Rural India
title_sort six years after manual small incision cataract surgery—perspective from a secondary level eye hospital in rural india
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7942105/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33595481
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_1355_20
work_keys_str_mv AT senalo sixyearsaftermanualsmallincisioncataractsurgeryperspectivefromasecondaryleveleyehospitalinruralindia