Cargando…

Intrathecal pain management with ziconotide: Time for consensus?

This article summarizes recommendations made by six pain specialists who discussed the rationale for ziconotide intrathecal analgesia (ITA) and the requirement for evidence‐based guidance on its use, from a European perspective. Riemser Pharma GmbH (Greifswald, Germany), which holds the European mar...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Matis, Georgios, De Negri, Pasquale, Dupoiron, Denis, Likar, Rudolf, Zuidema, Xander, Rasche, Dirk
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7943290/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33690987
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.2055
_version_ 1783662458591772672
author Matis, Georgios
De Negri, Pasquale
Dupoiron, Denis
Likar, Rudolf
Zuidema, Xander
Rasche, Dirk
author_facet Matis, Georgios
De Negri, Pasquale
Dupoiron, Denis
Likar, Rudolf
Zuidema, Xander
Rasche, Dirk
author_sort Matis, Georgios
collection PubMed
description This article summarizes recommendations made by six pain specialists who discussed the rationale for ziconotide intrathecal analgesia (ITA) and the requirement for evidence‐based guidance on its use, from a European perspective. Riemser Pharma GmbH (Greifswald, Germany), which holds the European marketing authorization for ziconotide, hosted the meeting. The group agreed that ITA is under‐used in Europe, adding that ziconotide ITA has potential to be a first‐line alternative to morphine; both are already first‐line options in the USA. Ziconotide ITA (initiated using a low‐dose, slow‐titration approach) is suitable for many patients with noncancer‐ or cancer‐related chronic refractory pain and no history of psychosis. Adopting ziconotide as first‐line ITA could reduce opioid usage in these patient populations. The group advocated a risk‐reduction strategy for all candidate patients, including compulsory prescreening for neuropsychosis, and requested US–European alignment of the licensed starting dose for ziconotide: the low‐and‐slow approach practiced in the USA has a better tolerability profile than the fixed high starting dose licensed in Europe. Of note, an update to the European Summary of Product Characteristics is anticipated in early 2021. The group acknowledged that the Polyanalgesic Consensus Conference (PACC) treatment algorithms for ziconotide ITA provide useful guidance, but recommendations tailored specifically for European settings are required. Before a consensus process can formally begin, the group called for additional European prospective studies to investigate ziconotide in low‐and‐slow dosing strategies, in different patient settings. Such data would enable European guidance to have the most appropriate evidence at its core.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7943290
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79432902021-03-16 Intrathecal pain management with ziconotide: Time for consensus? Matis, Georgios De Negri, Pasquale Dupoiron, Denis Likar, Rudolf Zuidema, Xander Rasche, Dirk Brain Behav Reviews This article summarizes recommendations made by six pain specialists who discussed the rationale for ziconotide intrathecal analgesia (ITA) and the requirement for evidence‐based guidance on its use, from a European perspective. Riemser Pharma GmbH (Greifswald, Germany), which holds the European marketing authorization for ziconotide, hosted the meeting. The group agreed that ITA is under‐used in Europe, adding that ziconotide ITA has potential to be a first‐line alternative to morphine; both are already first‐line options in the USA. Ziconotide ITA (initiated using a low‐dose, slow‐titration approach) is suitable for many patients with noncancer‐ or cancer‐related chronic refractory pain and no history of psychosis. Adopting ziconotide as first‐line ITA could reduce opioid usage in these patient populations. The group advocated a risk‐reduction strategy for all candidate patients, including compulsory prescreening for neuropsychosis, and requested US–European alignment of the licensed starting dose for ziconotide: the low‐and‐slow approach practiced in the USA has a better tolerability profile than the fixed high starting dose licensed in Europe. Of note, an update to the European Summary of Product Characteristics is anticipated in early 2021. The group acknowledged that the Polyanalgesic Consensus Conference (PACC) treatment algorithms for ziconotide ITA provide useful guidance, but recommendations tailored specifically for European settings are required. Before a consensus process can formally begin, the group called for additional European prospective studies to investigate ziconotide in low‐and‐slow dosing strategies, in different patient settings. Such data would enable European guidance to have the most appropriate evidence at its core. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-03-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7943290/ /pubmed/33690987 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.2055 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Brain and Behavior published by Wiley Periodicals LLC This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Reviews
Matis, Georgios
De Negri, Pasquale
Dupoiron, Denis
Likar, Rudolf
Zuidema, Xander
Rasche, Dirk
Intrathecal pain management with ziconotide: Time for consensus?
title Intrathecal pain management with ziconotide: Time for consensus?
title_full Intrathecal pain management with ziconotide: Time for consensus?
title_fullStr Intrathecal pain management with ziconotide: Time for consensus?
title_full_unstemmed Intrathecal pain management with ziconotide: Time for consensus?
title_short Intrathecal pain management with ziconotide: Time for consensus?
title_sort intrathecal pain management with ziconotide: time for consensus?
topic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7943290/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33690987
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.2055
work_keys_str_mv AT matisgeorgios intrathecalpainmanagementwithziconotidetimeforconsensus
AT denegripasquale intrathecalpainmanagementwithziconotidetimeforconsensus
AT dupoirondenis intrathecalpainmanagementwithziconotidetimeforconsensus
AT likarrudolf intrathecalpainmanagementwithziconotidetimeforconsensus
AT zuidemaxander intrathecalpainmanagementwithziconotidetimeforconsensus
AT raschedirk intrathecalpainmanagementwithziconotidetimeforconsensus