Cargando…

Evaluation of acromial spur using ultrasonography

BACKGROUND: The presence of an acromial spur implies a rotator cuff disorder due to impingement between the acromial spur and the rotator cuff. The purpose of the study was to observe acromial spurs using ultrasonography and to compare measurements between plain radiographs and sonograms. METHODS: W...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Hyungsuk, Choi, Syungkyun, Park, Soo Bin, Song, Hyun Seok
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Shoulder and Elbow Society 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7943378/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33652507
http://dx.doi.org/10.5397/cise.2020.00332
_version_ 1783662478507376640
author Kim, Hyungsuk
Choi, Syungkyun
Park, Soo Bin
Song, Hyun Seok
author_facet Kim, Hyungsuk
Choi, Syungkyun
Park, Soo Bin
Song, Hyun Seok
author_sort Kim, Hyungsuk
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The presence of an acromial spur implies a rotator cuff disorder due to impingement between the acromial spur and the rotator cuff. The purpose of the study was to observe acromial spurs using ultrasonography and to compare measurements between plain radiographs and sonograms. METHODS: We retrospectively enrolled 51 consecutive patients with acromial spurs, which were interpreted on preoperative plain radiographs (supraspinatus outlet view and 30° caudal tilt) and preoperative sonograms. The ultrasonography transducer was held vertically and continuously moved laterally, which corresponded to the long axis of the long head of the biceps. The distance from the most distal margin of the original acromion to the most projected point of the acromial spur was measured. RESULTS: No significant difference was found between the plain radiograph and ultrasonography measurements (p=0.186). A moderate to strong correlation was detected between the ultrasonography and supraspinatus outlet-view measurements (r=0.776, p=0.000). CONCLUSIONS: Anteriorly projected acromial spurs were well-visualized by ultrasonography. No discrepancy in acromial spur length was detected between the use of plain radiography (supraspinatus outlet view and 30° caudal-tilt view) and ultrasonography. The correlation coefficients between the plain radiography and ultrasonography measurements exceeded 0.7.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7943378
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Korean Shoulder and Elbow Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79433782021-03-18 Evaluation of acromial spur using ultrasonography Kim, Hyungsuk Choi, Syungkyun Park, Soo Bin Song, Hyun Seok Clin Shoulder Elb Original Article BACKGROUND: The presence of an acromial spur implies a rotator cuff disorder due to impingement between the acromial spur and the rotator cuff. The purpose of the study was to observe acromial spurs using ultrasonography and to compare measurements between plain radiographs and sonograms. METHODS: We retrospectively enrolled 51 consecutive patients with acromial spurs, which were interpreted on preoperative plain radiographs (supraspinatus outlet view and 30° caudal tilt) and preoperative sonograms. The ultrasonography transducer was held vertically and continuously moved laterally, which corresponded to the long axis of the long head of the biceps. The distance from the most distal margin of the original acromion to the most projected point of the acromial spur was measured. RESULTS: No significant difference was found between the plain radiograph and ultrasonography measurements (p=0.186). A moderate to strong correlation was detected between the ultrasonography and supraspinatus outlet-view measurements (r=0.776, p=0.000). CONCLUSIONS: Anteriorly projected acromial spurs were well-visualized by ultrasonography. No discrepancy in acromial spur length was detected between the use of plain radiography (supraspinatus outlet view and 30° caudal-tilt view) and ultrasonography. The correlation coefficients between the plain radiography and ultrasonography measurements exceeded 0.7. Korean Shoulder and Elbow Society 2021-02-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7943378/ /pubmed/33652507 http://dx.doi.org/10.5397/cise.2020.00332 Text en Copyright © 2021 Korean Shoulder and Elbow Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kim, Hyungsuk
Choi, Syungkyun
Park, Soo Bin
Song, Hyun Seok
Evaluation of acromial spur using ultrasonography
title Evaluation of acromial spur using ultrasonography
title_full Evaluation of acromial spur using ultrasonography
title_fullStr Evaluation of acromial spur using ultrasonography
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of acromial spur using ultrasonography
title_short Evaluation of acromial spur using ultrasonography
title_sort evaluation of acromial spur using ultrasonography
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7943378/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33652507
http://dx.doi.org/10.5397/cise.2020.00332
work_keys_str_mv AT kimhyungsuk evaluationofacromialspurusingultrasonography
AT choisyungkyun evaluationofacromialspurusingultrasonography
AT parksoobin evaluationofacromialspurusingultrasonography
AT songhyunseok evaluationofacromialspurusingultrasonography