Cargando…

Does co-presence affect the way we perceive and respond to emotional interactions?

This study compared how two virtual display conditions of human body expressions influenced explicit and implicit dimensions of emotion perception and response behavior in women and men. Two avatars displayed emotional interactions (angry, sad, affectionate, happy) in a “pictorial” condition depicti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bachmann, Julia, Zabicki, Adam, Gradl, Stefan, Kurz, Johannes, Munzert, Jörn, Troje, Nikolaus F., Krueger, Britta
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7943523/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33427949
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-020-06020-5
_version_ 1783662512140451840
author Bachmann, Julia
Zabicki, Adam
Gradl, Stefan
Kurz, Johannes
Munzert, Jörn
Troje, Nikolaus F.
Krueger, Britta
author_facet Bachmann, Julia
Zabicki, Adam
Gradl, Stefan
Kurz, Johannes
Munzert, Jörn
Troje, Nikolaus F.
Krueger, Britta
author_sort Bachmann, Julia
collection PubMed
description This study compared how two virtual display conditions of human body expressions influenced explicit and implicit dimensions of emotion perception and response behavior in women and men. Two avatars displayed emotional interactions (angry, sad, affectionate, happy) in a “pictorial” condition depicting the emotional interactive partners on a screen within a virtual environment and a “visual” condition allowing participants to share space with the avatars, thereby enhancing co-presence and agency. Subsequently to stimulus presentation, explicit valence perception and response tendency (i.e. the explicit tendency to avoid or approach the situation) were assessed on rating scales. Implicit responses, i.e. postural and autonomic responses towards the observed interactions were measured by means of postural displacement and changes in skin conductance. Results showed that self-reported presence differed between pictorial and visual conditions, however, it was not correlated with skin conductance responses. Valence perception was only marginally influenced by the virtual condition and not at all by explicit response behavior. There were gender-mediated effects on postural response tendencies as well as gender differences in explicit response behavior but not in valence perception. Exploratory analyses revealed a link between valence perception and preferred behavioral response in women but not in men. We conclude that the display condition seems to influence automatic motivational tendencies but not higher level cognitive evaluations. Moreover, intragroup differences in explicit and implicit response behavior highlight the importance of individual factors beyond gender. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00221-020-06020-5.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7943523
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79435232021-03-28 Does co-presence affect the way we perceive and respond to emotional interactions? Bachmann, Julia Zabicki, Adam Gradl, Stefan Kurz, Johannes Munzert, Jörn Troje, Nikolaus F. Krueger, Britta Exp Brain Res Research Article This study compared how two virtual display conditions of human body expressions influenced explicit and implicit dimensions of emotion perception and response behavior in women and men. Two avatars displayed emotional interactions (angry, sad, affectionate, happy) in a “pictorial” condition depicting the emotional interactive partners on a screen within a virtual environment and a “visual” condition allowing participants to share space with the avatars, thereby enhancing co-presence and agency. Subsequently to stimulus presentation, explicit valence perception and response tendency (i.e. the explicit tendency to avoid or approach the situation) were assessed on rating scales. Implicit responses, i.e. postural and autonomic responses towards the observed interactions were measured by means of postural displacement and changes in skin conductance. Results showed that self-reported presence differed between pictorial and visual conditions, however, it was not correlated with skin conductance responses. Valence perception was only marginally influenced by the virtual condition and not at all by explicit response behavior. There were gender-mediated effects on postural response tendencies as well as gender differences in explicit response behavior but not in valence perception. Exploratory analyses revealed a link between valence perception and preferred behavioral response in women but not in men. We conclude that the display condition seems to influence automatic motivational tendencies but not higher level cognitive evaluations. Moreover, intragroup differences in explicit and implicit response behavior highlight the importance of individual factors beyond gender. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00221-020-06020-5. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-01-11 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7943523/ /pubmed/33427949 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-020-06020-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research Article
Bachmann, Julia
Zabicki, Adam
Gradl, Stefan
Kurz, Johannes
Munzert, Jörn
Troje, Nikolaus F.
Krueger, Britta
Does co-presence affect the way we perceive and respond to emotional interactions?
title Does co-presence affect the way we perceive and respond to emotional interactions?
title_full Does co-presence affect the way we perceive and respond to emotional interactions?
title_fullStr Does co-presence affect the way we perceive and respond to emotional interactions?
title_full_unstemmed Does co-presence affect the way we perceive and respond to emotional interactions?
title_short Does co-presence affect the way we perceive and respond to emotional interactions?
title_sort does co-presence affect the way we perceive and respond to emotional interactions?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7943523/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33427949
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-020-06020-5
work_keys_str_mv AT bachmannjulia doescopresenceaffectthewayweperceiveandrespondtoemotionalinteractions
AT zabickiadam doescopresenceaffectthewayweperceiveandrespondtoemotionalinteractions
AT gradlstefan doescopresenceaffectthewayweperceiveandrespondtoemotionalinteractions
AT kurzjohannes doescopresenceaffectthewayweperceiveandrespondtoemotionalinteractions
AT munzertjorn doescopresenceaffectthewayweperceiveandrespondtoemotionalinteractions
AT trojenikolausf doescopresenceaffectthewayweperceiveandrespondtoemotionalinteractions
AT kruegerbritta doescopresenceaffectthewayweperceiveandrespondtoemotionalinteractions