Cargando…
A systematic review of the cost-effectiveness of ultrasound in emergency care settings
BACKGROUND: The use of ultrasound (US) in emergency departments (ED) has become widespread. This includes both traditional US scans performed by radiology departments as well as point-of-care US (POCUS) performed by bedside clinicians. There has been significant interest in better understanding the...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7943664/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33687607 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13089-021-00216-8 |
_version_ | 1783662541022429184 |
---|---|
author | Lentz, Brian Fong, Tiffany Rhyne, Randall Risko, Nicholas |
author_facet | Lentz, Brian Fong, Tiffany Rhyne, Randall Risko, Nicholas |
author_sort | Lentz, Brian |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The use of ultrasound (US) in emergency departments (ED) has become widespread. This includes both traditional US scans performed by radiology departments as well as point-of-care US (POCUS) performed by bedside clinicians. There has been significant interest in better understanding the appropriate use of imaging and where opportunities to enhance cost-effectiveness may exist. The purpose of this systematic review is to identify published evidence surrounding the cost-effectiveness of US in the ED and to grade the quality of that evidence. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of the literature following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies were considered for inclusion if they were: (1) economic evaluations, (2) studied the clinical use of ultrasound, and (3) took place in an emergency care setting. Included studies were critically appraised using the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards checklist. RESULTS: We identified 631 potentially relevant articles. Of these, 35 studies met all inclusion criteria and were eligible for data abstraction. In general, studies were supportive of the use of US. In particular, 11 studies formed a strong consensus that US enhanced cost-effectiveness in the investigation of pediatric appendicitis and 6 studies supported enhancements in the evaluation of abdominal trauma. Across the studies, weaknesses in methodology and reporting were common, such as lack of sensitivity analyses and inconsistent reporting of incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. CONCLUSIONS: The body of existing evidence, though limited, generally demonstrates that the inclusion of US in emergency care settings allows for more cost-effective care. The most definitive evidence for improvements in cost-effectiveness surround the evaluation of pediatric appendicitis, followed by the evaluation of abdominal trauma. POCUS outside of trauma has had mixed results. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7943664 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79436642021-03-28 A systematic review of the cost-effectiveness of ultrasound in emergency care settings Lentz, Brian Fong, Tiffany Rhyne, Randall Risko, Nicholas Ultrasound J Review BACKGROUND: The use of ultrasound (US) in emergency departments (ED) has become widespread. This includes both traditional US scans performed by radiology departments as well as point-of-care US (POCUS) performed by bedside clinicians. There has been significant interest in better understanding the appropriate use of imaging and where opportunities to enhance cost-effectiveness may exist. The purpose of this systematic review is to identify published evidence surrounding the cost-effectiveness of US in the ED and to grade the quality of that evidence. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of the literature following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies were considered for inclusion if they were: (1) economic evaluations, (2) studied the clinical use of ultrasound, and (3) took place in an emergency care setting. Included studies were critically appraised using the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards checklist. RESULTS: We identified 631 potentially relevant articles. Of these, 35 studies met all inclusion criteria and were eligible for data abstraction. In general, studies were supportive of the use of US. In particular, 11 studies formed a strong consensus that US enhanced cost-effectiveness in the investigation of pediatric appendicitis and 6 studies supported enhancements in the evaluation of abdominal trauma. Across the studies, weaknesses in methodology and reporting were common, such as lack of sensitivity analyses and inconsistent reporting of incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. CONCLUSIONS: The body of existing evidence, though limited, generally demonstrates that the inclusion of US in emergency care settings allows for more cost-effective care. The most definitive evidence for improvements in cost-effectiveness surround the evaluation of pediatric appendicitis, followed by the evaluation of abdominal trauma. POCUS outside of trauma has had mixed results. Springer International Publishing 2021-03-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7943664/ /pubmed/33687607 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13089-021-00216-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Review Lentz, Brian Fong, Tiffany Rhyne, Randall Risko, Nicholas A systematic review of the cost-effectiveness of ultrasound in emergency care settings |
title | A systematic review of the cost-effectiveness of ultrasound in emergency care settings |
title_full | A systematic review of the cost-effectiveness of ultrasound in emergency care settings |
title_fullStr | A systematic review of the cost-effectiveness of ultrasound in emergency care settings |
title_full_unstemmed | A systematic review of the cost-effectiveness of ultrasound in emergency care settings |
title_short | A systematic review of the cost-effectiveness of ultrasound in emergency care settings |
title_sort | systematic review of the cost-effectiveness of ultrasound in emergency care settings |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7943664/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33687607 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13089-021-00216-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lentzbrian asystematicreviewofthecosteffectivenessofultrasoundinemergencycaresettings AT fongtiffany asystematicreviewofthecosteffectivenessofultrasoundinemergencycaresettings AT rhynerandall asystematicreviewofthecosteffectivenessofultrasoundinemergencycaresettings AT riskonicholas asystematicreviewofthecosteffectivenessofultrasoundinemergencycaresettings AT lentzbrian systematicreviewofthecosteffectivenessofultrasoundinemergencycaresettings AT fongtiffany systematicreviewofthecosteffectivenessofultrasoundinemergencycaresettings AT rhynerandall systematicreviewofthecosteffectivenessofultrasoundinemergencycaresettings AT riskonicholas systematicreviewofthecosteffectivenessofultrasoundinemergencycaresettings |