Cargando…
Using Interleaved Stimulation to Measure the Size and Selectivity of the Sustained Phase-Locked Neural Response to Cochlear Implant Stimulation
We measured the sustained neural response to electrical stimulation by a cochlear implant (CI). To do so, we interleaved two stimuli with frequencies F1 and F2 Hz and recorded a neural distortion response (NDR) at F2-F1 Hz. We show that, because any one time point contains only the F1 or F2 stimulus...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7943679/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33492562 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10162-020-00783-y |
_version_ | 1783662542445346816 |
---|---|
author | Carlyon, Robert P. Guérit, François Deeks, John M. Harland, Andrew Gransier, Robin Wouters, Jan de Rijk, Simone R. Bance, Manohar |
author_facet | Carlyon, Robert P. Guérit, François Deeks, John M. Harland, Andrew Gransier, Robin Wouters, Jan de Rijk, Simone R. Bance, Manohar |
author_sort | Carlyon, Robert P. |
collection | PubMed |
description | We measured the sustained neural response to electrical stimulation by a cochlear implant (CI). To do so, we interleaved two stimuli with frequencies F1 and F2 Hz and recorded a neural distortion response (NDR) at F2-F1 Hz. We show that, because any one time point contains only the F1 or F2 stimulus, the instantaneous nonlinearities typical of electrical artefact should not produce distortion at this frequency. However, if the stimulus is smoothed, such as by charge integration at the nerve membrane, subsequent (neural) nonlinearities can produce a component at F2-F1 Hz. We stimulated a single CI electrode with interleaved sinusoids or interleaved amplitude-modulated pulse trains such that F2 = 1.5F1, and found no evidence for an NDR when F2-F1 was between 90 and 120 Hz. However, interleaved amplitude-modulated pulse trains with F2-F1~40 Hz revealed a substantial NDR with a group delay of about 45 ms, consistent with a thalamic and/or cortical response. The NDR could be measured even from recording electrodes adjacent to the implant and at the highest pulse rates (> 4000 pps) used clinically. We then measured the selectivity of this sustained response by presenting F1 and F2 to different electrodes and at different between-electrode distances. This revealed a broad tuning that, we argue, reflects the overlap between the excitation elicited by the two electrodes. Our results also provide a glimpse of the neural nonlinearity in the auditory system, unaffected by the biomechanical cochlear nonlinearities that accompany acoustic stimulation. Several potential clinical applications of our findings are discussed. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10162-020-00783-y. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7943679 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79436792021-03-28 Using Interleaved Stimulation to Measure the Size and Selectivity of the Sustained Phase-Locked Neural Response to Cochlear Implant Stimulation Carlyon, Robert P. Guérit, François Deeks, John M. Harland, Andrew Gransier, Robin Wouters, Jan de Rijk, Simone R. Bance, Manohar J Assoc Res Otolaryngol Research Article We measured the sustained neural response to electrical stimulation by a cochlear implant (CI). To do so, we interleaved two stimuli with frequencies F1 and F2 Hz and recorded a neural distortion response (NDR) at F2-F1 Hz. We show that, because any one time point contains only the F1 or F2 stimulus, the instantaneous nonlinearities typical of electrical artefact should not produce distortion at this frequency. However, if the stimulus is smoothed, such as by charge integration at the nerve membrane, subsequent (neural) nonlinearities can produce a component at F2-F1 Hz. We stimulated a single CI electrode with interleaved sinusoids or interleaved amplitude-modulated pulse trains such that F2 = 1.5F1, and found no evidence for an NDR when F2-F1 was between 90 and 120 Hz. However, interleaved amplitude-modulated pulse trains with F2-F1~40 Hz revealed a substantial NDR with a group delay of about 45 ms, consistent with a thalamic and/or cortical response. The NDR could be measured even from recording electrodes adjacent to the implant and at the highest pulse rates (> 4000 pps) used clinically. We then measured the selectivity of this sustained response by presenting F1 and F2 to different electrodes and at different between-electrode distances. This revealed a broad tuning that, we argue, reflects the overlap between the excitation elicited by the two electrodes. Our results also provide a glimpse of the neural nonlinearity in the auditory system, unaffected by the biomechanical cochlear nonlinearities that accompany acoustic stimulation. Several potential clinical applications of our findings are discussed. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10162-020-00783-y. Springer US 2021-01-25 2021-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7943679/ /pubmed/33492562 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10162-020-00783-y Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Carlyon, Robert P. Guérit, François Deeks, John M. Harland, Andrew Gransier, Robin Wouters, Jan de Rijk, Simone R. Bance, Manohar Using Interleaved Stimulation to Measure the Size and Selectivity of the Sustained Phase-Locked Neural Response to Cochlear Implant Stimulation |
title | Using Interleaved Stimulation to Measure the Size and Selectivity of the Sustained Phase-Locked Neural Response to Cochlear Implant Stimulation |
title_full | Using Interleaved Stimulation to Measure the Size and Selectivity of the Sustained Phase-Locked Neural Response to Cochlear Implant Stimulation |
title_fullStr | Using Interleaved Stimulation to Measure the Size and Selectivity of the Sustained Phase-Locked Neural Response to Cochlear Implant Stimulation |
title_full_unstemmed | Using Interleaved Stimulation to Measure the Size and Selectivity of the Sustained Phase-Locked Neural Response to Cochlear Implant Stimulation |
title_short | Using Interleaved Stimulation to Measure the Size and Selectivity of the Sustained Phase-Locked Neural Response to Cochlear Implant Stimulation |
title_sort | using interleaved stimulation to measure the size and selectivity of the sustained phase-locked neural response to cochlear implant stimulation |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7943679/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33492562 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10162-020-00783-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT carlyonrobertp usinginterleavedstimulationtomeasurethesizeandselectivityofthesustainedphaselockedneuralresponsetocochlearimplantstimulation AT gueritfrancois usinginterleavedstimulationtomeasurethesizeandselectivityofthesustainedphaselockedneuralresponsetocochlearimplantstimulation AT deeksjohnm usinginterleavedstimulationtomeasurethesizeandselectivityofthesustainedphaselockedneuralresponsetocochlearimplantstimulation AT harlandandrew usinginterleavedstimulationtomeasurethesizeandselectivityofthesustainedphaselockedneuralresponsetocochlearimplantstimulation AT gransierrobin usinginterleavedstimulationtomeasurethesizeandselectivityofthesustainedphaselockedneuralresponsetocochlearimplantstimulation AT woutersjan usinginterleavedstimulationtomeasurethesizeandselectivityofthesustainedphaselockedneuralresponsetocochlearimplantstimulation AT derijksimoner usinginterleavedstimulationtomeasurethesizeandselectivityofthesustainedphaselockedneuralresponsetocochlearimplantstimulation AT bancemanohar usinginterleavedstimulationtomeasurethesizeandselectivityofthesustainedphaselockedneuralresponsetocochlearimplantstimulation |