Cargando…

Sensitivity to Pulse Phase Duration as a Marker of Neural Health Across Cochlear Implant Recipients and Electrodes

In cochlear implants, loudness has been shown to grow more slowly with increasing pulse phase duration (PPD) than with pulse amplitude (PA), possibly due to “leaky” charge integration. This leakiness has been recently quantified in terms of “charge integration efficiency,” defined as the log differe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhou, Ning, Zhu, Zhen, Dong, Lixue, Galvin, John
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7943680/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33559041
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10162-021-00784-5
_version_ 1783662542682324992
author Zhou, Ning
Zhu, Zhen
Dong, Lixue
Galvin, John
author_facet Zhou, Ning
Zhu, Zhen
Dong, Lixue
Galvin, John
author_sort Zhou, Ning
collection PubMed
description In cochlear implants, loudness has been shown to grow more slowly with increasing pulse phase duration (PPD) than with pulse amplitude (PA), possibly due to “leaky” charge integration. This leakiness has been recently quantified in terms of “charge integration efficiency,” defined as the log difference between the PPD dynamic range and PA dynamic range (both expressed in charge units), relative to a common threshold anchor. Such leakiness may differ across electrodes and/or test ears, and may reflect underlying neural health. In this study, we examined the across-site variation of charge integration in recipients of Cochlear© devices. PPD and PA dynamic ranges were measured relative to two threshold anchors with either a 25- or 50-microsecond PPD. Strength-duration functions, previously shown to relate to survival of spiral ganglion cells and peripheral processes, were compared to charge integration efficiency on selected electrodes. Results showed no significant or systematic relationship between the across-site variation in charge integration efficiency and electrode position or threshold levels. Charge integration efficiency was poorer with the 50-μs threshold anchor, suggesting that greater leakiness was associated with larger PPD dynamic ranges. Poorer and more variable charge integration efficiency across electrodes was associated with longer duration of any hearing loss, consistent with the idea that poor integration is related to neural degeneration. More variable integration efficiency was also associated with poorer speech recognition performance across test ears. The slopes of the strength-duration functions at maximum acceptable loudness were significantly correlated with charge integration efficiency. However, the strength-duration slopes were not predictive of duration of any hearing loss or speech recognition performance in our participants. As such, charge integration efficiency may be a better candidate to measure leakiness in neural populations across the electrode array, as well as the general health of the auditory nerve in human cochlear implant recipients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7943680
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79436802021-03-28 Sensitivity to Pulse Phase Duration as a Marker of Neural Health Across Cochlear Implant Recipients and Electrodes Zhou, Ning Zhu, Zhen Dong, Lixue Galvin, John J Assoc Res Otolaryngol Research Article In cochlear implants, loudness has been shown to grow more slowly with increasing pulse phase duration (PPD) than with pulse amplitude (PA), possibly due to “leaky” charge integration. This leakiness has been recently quantified in terms of “charge integration efficiency,” defined as the log difference between the PPD dynamic range and PA dynamic range (both expressed in charge units), relative to a common threshold anchor. Such leakiness may differ across electrodes and/or test ears, and may reflect underlying neural health. In this study, we examined the across-site variation of charge integration in recipients of Cochlear© devices. PPD and PA dynamic ranges were measured relative to two threshold anchors with either a 25- or 50-microsecond PPD. Strength-duration functions, previously shown to relate to survival of spiral ganglion cells and peripheral processes, were compared to charge integration efficiency on selected electrodes. Results showed no significant or systematic relationship between the across-site variation in charge integration efficiency and electrode position or threshold levels. Charge integration efficiency was poorer with the 50-μs threshold anchor, suggesting that greater leakiness was associated with larger PPD dynamic ranges. Poorer and more variable charge integration efficiency across electrodes was associated with longer duration of any hearing loss, consistent with the idea that poor integration is related to neural degeneration. More variable integration efficiency was also associated with poorer speech recognition performance across test ears. The slopes of the strength-duration functions at maximum acceptable loudness were significantly correlated with charge integration efficiency. However, the strength-duration slopes were not predictive of duration of any hearing loss or speech recognition performance in our participants. As such, charge integration efficiency may be a better candidate to measure leakiness in neural populations across the electrode array, as well as the general health of the auditory nerve in human cochlear implant recipients. Springer US 2021-02-08 2021-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7943680/ /pubmed/33559041 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10162-021-00784-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research Article
Zhou, Ning
Zhu, Zhen
Dong, Lixue
Galvin, John
Sensitivity to Pulse Phase Duration as a Marker of Neural Health Across Cochlear Implant Recipients and Electrodes
title Sensitivity to Pulse Phase Duration as a Marker of Neural Health Across Cochlear Implant Recipients and Electrodes
title_full Sensitivity to Pulse Phase Duration as a Marker of Neural Health Across Cochlear Implant Recipients and Electrodes
title_fullStr Sensitivity to Pulse Phase Duration as a Marker of Neural Health Across Cochlear Implant Recipients and Electrodes
title_full_unstemmed Sensitivity to Pulse Phase Duration as a Marker of Neural Health Across Cochlear Implant Recipients and Electrodes
title_short Sensitivity to Pulse Phase Duration as a Marker of Neural Health Across Cochlear Implant Recipients and Electrodes
title_sort sensitivity to pulse phase duration as a marker of neural health across cochlear implant recipients and electrodes
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7943680/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33559041
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10162-021-00784-5
work_keys_str_mv AT zhouning sensitivitytopulsephasedurationasamarkerofneuralhealthacrosscochlearimplantrecipientsandelectrodes
AT zhuzhen sensitivitytopulsephasedurationasamarkerofneuralhealthacrosscochlearimplantrecipientsandelectrodes
AT donglixue sensitivitytopulsephasedurationasamarkerofneuralhealthacrosscochlearimplantrecipientsandelectrodes
AT galvinjohn sensitivitytopulsephasedurationasamarkerofneuralhealthacrosscochlearimplantrecipientsandelectrodes