Cargando…

Benchmarking surface tension measurement method using two oscillation modes in levitated liquid metals

The Faraday forcing method in levitated liquid droplets has recently been introduced as a method for measuring surface tension using resonance. By subjecting an electrostatically levitated liquid metal droplet to a continuous, oscillatory, electric field, at a frequency nearing that of the droplet’s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brosius, Nevin, Ward, Kevin, Wilson, Evan, Karpinsky, Zachary, SanSoucie, Michael, Ishikawa, Takehiko, Matsumoto, Satoshi, Narayanan, Ranga
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7943785/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33750800
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41526-021-00137-9
_version_ 1783662565012799488
author Brosius, Nevin
Ward, Kevin
Wilson, Evan
Karpinsky, Zachary
SanSoucie, Michael
Ishikawa, Takehiko
Matsumoto, Satoshi
Narayanan, Ranga
author_facet Brosius, Nevin
Ward, Kevin
Wilson, Evan
Karpinsky, Zachary
SanSoucie, Michael
Ishikawa, Takehiko
Matsumoto, Satoshi
Narayanan, Ranga
author_sort Brosius, Nevin
collection PubMed
description The Faraday forcing method in levitated liquid droplets has recently been introduced as a method for measuring surface tension using resonance. By subjecting an electrostatically levitated liquid metal droplet to a continuous, oscillatory, electric field, at a frequency nearing that of the droplet’s first principal mode of oscillation (known as mode 2), the method was previously shown to determine surface tension of materials that would be particularly difficult to process by other means, e.g., liquid metals and alloys. It also offers distinct advantages in future work involving high viscosity samples because of the continuous forcing approach. This work presents (1) a benchmarking experimental method to measure surface tension by excitation of the second principal mode of oscillation (known as mode 3) in a levitated liquid droplet and (2) a more rigorous quantification of droplet excitation using a projection method. Surface tension measurements compare favorably to literature values for Zirconium, Inconel 625, and Rhodium, using both modes 2 and 3. Thus, this new method serves as a credible, self-consistent benchmarking technique for the measurement of surface tension.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7943785
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79437852021-03-28 Benchmarking surface tension measurement method using two oscillation modes in levitated liquid metals Brosius, Nevin Ward, Kevin Wilson, Evan Karpinsky, Zachary SanSoucie, Michael Ishikawa, Takehiko Matsumoto, Satoshi Narayanan, Ranga NPJ Microgravity Article The Faraday forcing method in levitated liquid droplets has recently been introduced as a method for measuring surface tension using resonance. By subjecting an electrostatically levitated liquid metal droplet to a continuous, oscillatory, electric field, at a frequency nearing that of the droplet’s first principal mode of oscillation (known as mode 2), the method was previously shown to determine surface tension of materials that would be particularly difficult to process by other means, e.g., liquid metals and alloys. It also offers distinct advantages in future work involving high viscosity samples because of the continuous forcing approach. This work presents (1) a benchmarking experimental method to measure surface tension by excitation of the second principal mode of oscillation (known as mode 3) in a levitated liquid droplet and (2) a more rigorous quantification of droplet excitation using a projection method. Surface tension measurements compare favorably to literature values for Zirconium, Inconel 625, and Rhodium, using both modes 2 and 3. Thus, this new method serves as a credible, self-consistent benchmarking technique for the measurement of surface tension. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-03-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7943785/ /pubmed/33750800 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41526-021-00137-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Brosius, Nevin
Ward, Kevin
Wilson, Evan
Karpinsky, Zachary
SanSoucie, Michael
Ishikawa, Takehiko
Matsumoto, Satoshi
Narayanan, Ranga
Benchmarking surface tension measurement method using two oscillation modes in levitated liquid metals
title Benchmarking surface tension measurement method using two oscillation modes in levitated liquid metals
title_full Benchmarking surface tension measurement method using two oscillation modes in levitated liquid metals
title_fullStr Benchmarking surface tension measurement method using two oscillation modes in levitated liquid metals
title_full_unstemmed Benchmarking surface tension measurement method using two oscillation modes in levitated liquid metals
title_short Benchmarking surface tension measurement method using two oscillation modes in levitated liquid metals
title_sort benchmarking surface tension measurement method using two oscillation modes in levitated liquid metals
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7943785/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33750800
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41526-021-00137-9
work_keys_str_mv AT brosiusnevin benchmarkingsurfacetensionmeasurementmethodusingtwooscillationmodesinlevitatedliquidmetals
AT wardkevin benchmarkingsurfacetensionmeasurementmethodusingtwooscillationmodesinlevitatedliquidmetals
AT wilsonevan benchmarkingsurfacetensionmeasurementmethodusingtwooscillationmodesinlevitatedliquidmetals
AT karpinskyzachary benchmarkingsurfacetensionmeasurementmethodusingtwooscillationmodesinlevitatedliquidmetals
AT sansouciemichael benchmarkingsurfacetensionmeasurementmethodusingtwooscillationmodesinlevitatedliquidmetals
AT ishikawatakehiko benchmarkingsurfacetensionmeasurementmethodusingtwooscillationmodesinlevitatedliquidmetals
AT matsumotosatoshi benchmarkingsurfacetensionmeasurementmethodusingtwooscillationmodesinlevitatedliquidmetals
AT narayananranga benchmarkingsurfacetensionmeasurementmethodusingtwooscillationmodesinlevitatedliquidmetals