Cargando…
Benchmarking surface tension measurement method using two oscillation modes in levitated liquid metals
The Faraday forcing method in levitated liquid droplets has recently been introduced as a method for measuring surface tension using resonance. By subjecting an electrostatically levitated liquid metal droplet to a continuous, oscillatory, electric field, at a frequency nearing that of the droplet’s...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7943785/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33750800 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41526-021-00137-9 |
_version_ | 1783662565012799488 |
---|---|
author | Brosius, Nevin Ward, Kevin Wilson, Evan Karpinsky, Zachary SanSoucie, Michael Ishikawa, Takehiko Matsumoto, Satoshi Narayanan, Ranga |
author_facet | Brosius, Nevin Ward, Kevin Wilson, Evan Karpinsky, Zachary SanSoucie, Michael Ishikawa, Takehiko Matsumoto, Satoshi Narayanan, Ranga |
author_sort | Brosius, Nevin |
collection | PubMed |
description | The Faraday forcing method in levitated liquid droplets has recently been introduced as a method for measuring surface tension using resonance. By subjecting an electrostatically levitated liquid metal droplet to a continuous, oscillatory, electric field, at a frequency nearing that of the droplet’s first principal mode of oscillation (known as mode 2), the method was previously shown to determine surface tension of materials that would be particularly difficult to process by other means, e.g., liquid metals and alloys. It also offers distinct advantages in future work involving high viscosity samples because of the continuous forcing approach. This work presents (1) a benchmarking experimental method to measure surface tension by excitation of the second principal mode of oscillation (known as mode 3) in a levitated liquid droplet and (2) a more rigorous quantification of droplet excitation using a projection method. Surface tension measurements compare favorably to literature values for Zirconium, Inconel 625, and Rhodium, using both modes 2 and 3. Thus, this new method serves as a credible, self-consistent benchmarking technique for the measurement of surface tension. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7943785 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79437852021-03-28 Benchmarking surface tension measurement method using two oscillation modes in levitated liquid metals Brosius, Nevin Ward, Kevin Wilson, Evan Karpinsky, Zachary SanSoucie, Michael Ishikawa, Takehiko Matsumoto, Satoshi Narayanan, Ranga NPJ Microgravity Article The Faraday forcing method in levitated liquid droplets has recently been introduced as a method for measuring surface tension using resonance. By subjecting an electrostatically levitated liquid metal droplet to a continuous, oscillatory, electric field, at a frequency nearing that of the droplet’s first principal mode of oscillation (known as mode 2), the method was previously shown to determine surface tension of materials that would be particularly difficult to process by other means, e.g., liquid metals and alloys. It also offers distinct advantages in future work involving high viscosity samples because of the continuous forcing approach. This work presents (1) a benchmarking experimental method to measure surface tension by excitation of the second principal mode of oscillation (known as mode 3) in a levitated liquid droplet and (2) a more rigorous quantification of droplet excitation using a projection method. Surface tension measurements compare favorably to literature values for Zirconium, Inconel 625, and Rhodium, using both modes 2 and 3. Thus, this new method serves as a credible, self-consistent benchmarking technique for the measurement of surface tension. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-03-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7943785/ /pubmed/33750800 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41526-021-00137-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Brosius, Nevin Ward, Kevin Wilson, Evan Karpinsky, Zachary SanSoucie, Michael Ishikawa, Takehiko Matsumoto, Satoshi Narayanan, Ranga Benchmarking surface tension measurement method using two oscillation modes in levitated liquid metals |
title | Benchmarking surface tension measurement method using two oscillation modes in levitated liquid metals |
title_full | Benchmarking surface tension measurement method using two oscillation modes in levitated liquid metals |
title_fullStr | Benchmarking surface tension measurement method using two oscillation modes in levitated liquid metals |
title_full_unstemmed | Benchmarking surface tension measurement method using two oscillation modes in levitated liquid metals |
title_short | Benchmarking surface tension measurement method using two oscillation modes in levitated liquid metals |
title_sort | benchmarking surface tension measurement method using two oscillation modes in levitated liquid metals |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7943785/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33750800 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41526-021-00137-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT brosiusnevin benchmarkingsurfacetensionmeasurementmethodusingtwooscillationmodesinlevitatedliquidmetals AT wardkevin benchmarkingsurfacetensionmeasurementmethodusingtwooscillationmodesinlevitatedliquidmetals AT wilsonevan benchmarkingsurfacetensionmeasurementmethodusingtwooscillationmodesinlevitatedliquidmetals AT karpinskyzachary benchmarkingsurfacetensionmeasurementmethodusingtwooscillationmodesinlevitatedliquidmetals AT sansouciemichael benchmarkingsurfacetensionmeasurementmethodusingtwooscillationmodesinlevitatedliquidmetals AT ishikawatakehiko benchmarkingsurfacetensionmeasurementmethodusingtwooscillationmodesinlevitatedliquidmetals AT matsumotosatoshi benchmarkingsurfacetensionmeasurementmethodusingtwooscillationmodesinlevitatedliquidmetals AT narayananranga benchmarkingsurfacetensionmeasurementmethodusingtwooscillationmodesinlevitatedliquidmetals |