Cargando…
Evidence synthesis papers would benefit from segmented peer review
• Evidence synthesis (including systematic reviews, scoping reviews, and more) involves many complementary areas of expertise: methods, information retrieval, statistics, and clinical knowledge. • Few individual peer reviewers have all the requisite knowledge to evaluate all aspects of evidence synt...
Autores principales: | Nyhan, Kate, Nardini, Holly K. Grossetta |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Neoplasia Press
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7944096/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33706230 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tranon.2021.101060 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Librarians as methodological peer reviewers for systematic reviews: results of an online survey
por: Grossetta Nardini, Holly K., et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Medical students benefit from becoming peer reviewers
por: Murtha, Celeste
Publicado: (2023) -
Micro-costing studies in the health and medical literature: protocol for a systematic review
por: Xu, Xiao, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Proposal for ‘segmented peer review’ of multidisciplinary papers
por: Dinakaran, Deepak, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Reviewing papers as you would like your papers to be reviewed
por: Baum, Buzz
Publicado: (2019)