Cargando…

Barriers to and facilitators of endorsement for scheduled medicines in podiatry: a qualitative descriptive study

BACKGROUND: Australian podiatrists and podiatric surgeons who have successfully completed the requirements for endorsement for scheduled medicines, as directed by the Podiatry Board of Australia, are eligible to prescribe a limited amount of schedule 2, 3, 4 or 8 medications. Registration to become...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Graham, Kristin, Banwell, Helen A., Causby, Ryan S., Kumar, Saravana, Tian, Esther Jie, Nissen, Lisa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7944244/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33691758
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13047-021-00457-9
_version_ 1783662647490641920
author Graham, Kristin
Banwell, Helen A.
Causby, Ryan S.
Kumar, Saravana
Tian, Esther Jie
Nissen, Lisa
author_facet Graham, Kristin
Banwell, Helen A.
Causby, Ryan S.
Kumar, Saravana
Tian, Esther Jie
Nissen, Lisa
author_sort Graham, Kristin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Australian podiatrists and podiatric surgeons who have successfully completed the requirements for endorsement for scheduled medicines, as directed by the Podiatry Board of Australia, are eligible to prescribe a limited amount of schedule 2, 3, 4 or 8 medications. Registration to become endorsed for scheduled medicines has been available to podiatrists for over 10 years, yet the uptake of training has remained low (approximately 2% of registered podiatrists/podiatry surgeons). This study aimed to explore barriers to and facilitators of engagement with endorsement for scheduled medicines by podiatrists. METHODS: Qualitative descriptive methodology informed this research. A purposive maximum variation sampling strategy was used to recruit 13 registered podiatrists and a podiatric surgeon who were either endorsed for scheduled medicines, in training or not endorsed. Semi-structured interviews were employed to collate the data which were analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Three overarching super-ordinate themes were identified which encompassed both barriers and facilitators: (1) competence and autonomy, (2) social and workplace influences, and (3) extrinsic motivators. Within these, several prominent sub-themes emerged of importance to the participants including workplace and social networks role in modelling behaviours, identifying mentors, and access to supervised training opportunities. Stage of life and career often influenced engagement. Additionally, a lack of financial incentive, cost and time involved in training, and lack of knowledge of training requirements were influential barriers. Rural podiatrists encountered a considerable number of barriers in most of the identified areas. CONCLUSION: A multitude of barriers and facilitators exist for podiatrists as part of the endorsement for scheduled medicines. The findings suggest that a lack of engagement with endorsement for scheduled medicines training may be assisted by a more structured training process and increasing the number of podiatrists who are endorsed to increase the numbers of role models, mentors, and supervision opportunities. Recommendations are provided for approaches as means of achieving, and sustaining, these outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7944244
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79442442021-03-10 Barriers to and facilitators of endorsement for scheduled medicines in podiatry: a qualitative descriptive study Graham, Kristin Banwell, Helen A. Causby, Ryan S. Kumar, Saravana Tian, Esther Jie Nissen, Lisa J Foot Ankle Res Research BACKGROUND: Australian podiatrists and podiatric surgeons who have successfully completed the requirements for endorsement for scheduled medicines, as directed by the Podiatry Board of Australia, are eligible to prescribe a limited amount of schedule 2, 3, 4 or 8 medications. Registration to become endorsed for scheduled medicines has been available to podiatrists for over 10 years, yet the uptake of training has remained low (approximately 2% of registered podiatrists/podiatry surgeons). This study aimed to explore barriers to and facilitators of engagement with endorsement for scheduled medicines by podiatrists. METHODS: Qualitative descriptive methodology informed this research. A purposive maximum variation sampling strategy was used to recruit 13 registered podiatrists and a podiatric surgeon who were either endorsed for scheduled medicines, in training or not endorsed. Semi-structured interviews were employed to collate the data which were analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Three overarching super-ordinate themes were identified which encompassed both barriers and facilitators: (1) competence and autonomy, (2) social and workplace influences, and (3) extrinsic motivators. Within these, several prominent sub-themes emerged of importance to the participants including workplace and social networks role in modelling behaviours, identifying mentors, and access to supervised training opportunities. Stage of life and career often influenced engagement. Additionally, a lack of financial incentive, cost and time involved in training, and lack of knowledge of training requirements were influential barriers. Rural podiatrists encountered a considerable number of barriers in most of the identified areas. CONCLUSION: A multitude of barriers and facilitators exist for podiatrists as part of the endorsement for scheduled medicines. The findings suggest that a lack of engagement with endorsement for scheduled medicines training may be assisted by a more structured training process and increasing the number of podiatrists who are endorsed to increase the numbers of role models, mentors, and supervision opportunities. Recommendations are provided for approaches as means of achieving, and sustaining, these outcomes. BioMed Central 2021-03-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7944244/ /pubmed/33691758 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13047-021-00457-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Graham, Kristin
Banwell, Helen A.
Causby, Ryan S.
Kumar, Saravana
Tian, Esther Jie
Nissen, Lisa
Barriers to and facilitators of endorsement for scheduled medicines in podiatry: a qualitative descriptive study
title Barriers to and facilitators of endorsement for scheduled medicines in podiatry: a qualitative descriptive study
title_full Barriers to and facilitators of endorsement for scheduled medicines in podiatry: a qualitative descriptive study
title_fullStr Barriers to and facilitators of endorsement for scheduled medicines in podiatry: a qualitative descriptive study
title_full_unstemmed Barriers to and facilitators of endorsement for scheduled medicines in podiatry: a qualitative descriptive study
title_short Barriers to and facilitators of endorsement for scheduled medicines in podiatry: a qualitative descriptive study
title_sort barriers to and facilitators of endorsement for scheduled medicines in podiatry: a qualitative descriptive study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7944244/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33691758
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13047-021-00457-9
work_keys_str_mv AT grahamkristin barrierstoandfacilitatorsofendorsementforscheduledmedicinesinpodiatryaqualitativedescriptivestudy
AT banwellhelena barrierstoandfacilitatorsofendorsementforscheduledmedicinesinpodiatryaqualitativedescriptivestudy
AT causbyryans barrierstoandfacilitatorsofendorsementforscheduledmedicinesinpodiatryaqualitativedescriptivestudy
AT kumarsaravana barrierstoandfacilitatorsofendorsementforscheduledmedicinesinpodiatryaqualitativedescriptivestudy
AT tianestherjie barrierstoandfacilitatorsofendorsementforscheduledmedicinesinpodiatryaqualitativedescriptivestudy
AT nissenlisa barrierstoandfacilitatorsofendorsementforscheduledmedicinesinpodiatryaqualitativedescriptivestudy