Cargando…
Barriers to and facilitators of endorsement for scheduled medicines in podiatry: a qualitative descriptive study
BACKGROUND: Australian podiatrists and podiatric surgeons who have successfully completed the requirements for endorsement for scheduled medicines, as directed by the Podiatry Board of Australia, are eligible to prescribe a limited amount of schedule 2, 3, 4 or 8 medications. Registration to become...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7944244/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33691758 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13047-021-00457-9 |
_version_ | 1783662647490641920 |
---|---|
author | Graham, Kristin Banwell, Helen A. Causby, Ryan S. Kumar, Saravana Tian, Esther Jie Nissen, Lisa |
author_facet | Graham, Kristin Banwell, Helen A. Causby, Ryan S. Kumar, Saravana Tian, Esther Jie Nissen, Lisa |
author_sort | Graham, Kristin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Australian podiatrists and podiatric surgeons who have successfully completed the requirements for endorsement for scheduled medicines, as directed by the Podiatry Board of Australia, are eligible to prescribe a limited amount of schedule 2, 3, 4 or 8 medications. Registration to become endorsed for scheduled medicines has been available to podiatrists for over 10 years, yet the uptake of training has remained low (approximately 2% of registered podiatrists/podiatry surgeons). This study aimed to explore barriers to and facilitators of engagement with endorsement for scheduled medicines by podiatrists. METHODS: Qualitative descriptive methodology informed this research. A purposive maximum variation sampling strategy was used to recruit 13 registered podiatrists and a podiatric surgeon who were either endorsed for scheduled medicines, in training or not endorsed. Semi-structured interviews were employed to collate the data which were analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Three overarching super-ordinate themes were identified which encompassed both barriers and facilitators: (1) competence and autonomy, (2) social and workplace influences, and (3) extrinsic motivators. Within these, several prominent sub-themes emerged of importance to the participants including workplace and social networks role in modelling behaviours, identifying mentors, and access to supervised training opportunities. Stage of life and career often influenced engagement. Additionally, a lack of financial incentive, cost and time involved in training, and lack of knowledge of training requirements were influential barriers. Rural podiatrists encountered a considerable number of barriers in most of the identified areas. CONCLUSION: A multitude of barriers and facilitators exist for podiatrists as part of the endorsement for scheduled medicines. The findings suggest that a lack of engagement with endorsement for scheduled medicines training may be assisted by a more structured training process and increasing the number of podiatrists who are endorsed to increase the numbers of role models, mentors, and supervision opportunities. Recommendations are provided for approaches as means of achieving, and sustaining, these outcomes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7944244 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79442442021-03-10 Barriers to and facilitators of endorsement for scheduled medicines in podiatry: a qualitative descriptive study Graham, Kristin Banwell, Helen A. Causby, Ryan S. Kumar, Saravana Tian, Esther Jie Nissen, Lisa J Foot Ankle Res Research BACKGROUND: Australian podiatrists and podiatric surgeons who have successfully completed the requirements for endorsement for scheduled medicines, as directed by the Podiatry Board of Australia, are eligible to prescribe a limited amount of schedule 2, 3, 4 or 8 medications. Registration to become endorsed for scheduled medicines has been available to podiatrists for over 10 years, yet the uptake of training has remained low (approximately 2% of registered podiatrists/podiatry surgeons). This study aimed to explore barriers to and facilitators of engagement with endorsement for scheduled medicines by podiatrists. METHODS: Qualitative descriptive methodology informed this research. A purposive maximum variation sampling strategy was used to recruit 13 registered podiatrists and a podiatric surgeon who were either endorsed for scheduled medicines, in training or not endorsed. Semi-structured interviews were employed to collate the data which were analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Three overarching super-ordinate themes were identified which encompassed both barriers and facilitators: (1) competence and autonomy, (2) social and workplace influences, and (3) extrinsic motivators. Within these, several prominent sub-themes emerged of importance to the participants including workplace and social networks role in modelling behaviours, identifying mentors, and access to supervised training opportunities. Stage of life and career often influenced engagement. Additionally, a lack of financial incentive, cost and time involved in training, and lack of knowledge of training requirements were influential barriers. Rural podiatrists encountered a considerable number of barriers in most of the identified areas. CONCLUSION: A multitude of barriers and facilitators exist for podiatrists as part of the endorsement for scheduled medicines. The findings suggest that a lack of engagement with endorsement for scheduled medicines training may be assisted by a more structured training process and increasing the number of podiatrists who are endorsed to increase the numbers of role models, mentors, and supervision opportunities. Recommendations are provided for approaches as means of achieving, and sustaining, these outcomes. BioMed Central 2021-03-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7944244/ /pubmed/33691758 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13047-021-00457-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Graham, Kristin Banwell, Helen A. Causby, Ryan S. Kumar, Saravana Tian, Esther Jie Nissen, Lisa Barriers to and facilitators of endorsement for scheduled medicines in podiatry: a qualitative descriptive study |
title | Barriers to and facilitators of endorsement for scheduled medicines in podiatry: a qualitative descriptive study |
title_full | Barriers to and facilitators of endorsement for scheduled medicines in podiatry: a qualitative descriptive study |
title_fullStr | Barriers to and facilitators of endorsement for scheduled medicines in podiatry: a qualitative descriptive study |
title_full_unstemmed | Barriers to and facilitators of endorsement for scheduled medicines in podiatry: a qualitative descriptive study |
title_short | Barriers to and facilitators of endorsement for scheduled medicines in podiatry: a qualitative descriptive study |
title_sort | barriers to and facilitators of endorsement for scheduled medicines in podiatry: a qualitative descriptive study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7944244/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33691758 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13047-021-00457-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT grahamkristin barrierstoandfacilitatorsofendorsementforscheduledmedicinesinpodiatryaqualitativedescriptivestudy AT banwellhelena barrierstoandfacilitatorsofendorsementforscheduledmedicinesinpodiatryaqualitativedescriptivestudy AT causbyryans barrierstoandfacilitatorsofendorsementforscheduledmedicinesinpodiatryaqualitativedescriptivestudy AT kumarsaravana barrierstoandfacilitatorsofendorsementforscheduledmedicinesinpodiatryaqualitativedescriptivestudy AT tianestherjie barrierstoandfacilitatorsofendorsementforscheduledmedicinesinpodiatryaqualitativedescriptivestudy AT nissenlisa barrierstoandfacilitatorsofendorsementforscheduledmedicinesinpodiatryaqualitativedescriptivestudy |