Cargando…

Application of deep learning to predict underestimation in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast with ultrasound

BACKGROUND: To develop an ultrasound-based deep learning model to predict postoperative upgrading of pure ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) diagnosed by core needle biopsy (CNB) before surgery. METHODS: Of the 360 patients with DCIS diagnosed by CNB and identified retrospectively, 180 had lesions upst...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Qian, Lang, Lv, Zhikun, Zhang, Kai, Wang, Kun, Zhu, Qian, Zhou, Shichong, Chang, Cai, Tian, Jie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7944276/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33708922
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-3981
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: To develop an ultrasound-based deep learning model to predict postoperative upgrading of pure ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) diagnosed by core needle biopsy (CNB) before surgery. METHODS: Of the 360 patients with DCIS diagnosed by CNB and identified retrospectively, 180 had lesions upstaged to ductal carcinoma in situ with microinvasion (DCISM) or invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) postoperatively. Ultrasound images obtained from the hospital database were divided into a training set (n=240) and validation set (n=120), with a ratio of 2:1 in chronological order. Four deep learning models, based on the ResNet and VggNet structures, were established to classify the ultrasound images into postoperative upgrade and pure DCIS. We obtained the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), specificity, sensitivity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) to estimate the performance of the predictive models. The robustness of the models was evaluated by a 3-fold cross-validation. RESULTS: Clinical features were not significantly different between the training set and the test set (P value >0.05). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of our models ranged from 0.724 to 0.804. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the optimal model were 0.733, 0.750, and 0.742, respectively. The three-fold cross-validation results showed that the model was very robust. CONCLUSIONS: The ultrasound-based deep learning prediction model is effective in predicting DCIS that will be upgraded postoperatively.