Cargando…

Comparison of three lymph node staging methods for predicting outcome in breast cancer patients with mastectomy

BACKGROUND: Axillary lymph node (ALN) staging is essential in predicting the clinical outcome of breast cancer (BC) patients. Traditionally, it follows the tumor–node-metastasis (TNM) staging, but its accuracy needs further improvement. METHODS: A total of 9,616 BC patients from the Surveillance, Ep...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Meng-Shen, Wang, Mo-Zhi, Wang, Zhenning, Song, Yongxi, Gao, Peng, Wang, Pengliang, Wang, Chong, Yu, Xueting, Wei, Fengheng, Guo, Jingyi, Xu, Yingying
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7944312/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33708927
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-4856
_version_ 1783662663491911680
author Wang, Meng-Shen
Wang, Mo-Zhi
Wang, Zhenning
Song, Yongxi
Gao, Peng
Wang, Pengliang
Wang, Chong
Yu, Xueting
Wei, Fengheng
Guo, Jingyi
Xu, Yingying
author_facet Wang, Meng-Shen
Wang, Mo-Zhi
Wang, Zhenning
Song, Yongxi
Gao, Peng
Wang, Pengliang
Wang, Chong
Yu, Xueting
Wei, Fengheng
Guo, Jingyi
Xu, Yingying
author_sort Wang, Meng-Shen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Axillary lymph node (ALN) staging is essential in predicting the clinical outcome of breast cancer (BC) patients. Traditionally, it follows the tumor–node-metastasis (TNM) staging, but its accuracy needs further improvement. METHODS: A total of 9,616 BC patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database and 675 patients from the First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University underwent mastectomy together with ALN dissection were reviewed. Univariate and multivariate logistic analyses were conducted to find the most meaningful factors relevant to prognosis. RESULTS: After univariate and multivariate analyses, age, race, primary site, radiation, chemotherapy, grade, T-stage, estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), total number of positive lymph nodes (pN), positive lymph node ratio (LNR) and log odds of positive LNs (LODDS) were found to be significantly associated with overall survival (OS). Using these non-LN risk factors, we further compared the efficacy of three different ALN staging methods in prognosis via nomograms. Harrell’s concordance index (C-index) and Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) were used to measure nomogram performance of the ALN staging methods: pN: C-index=0.687 (95% CI: 0.678–0.696), AIC =61,398.24; LNR: C-index =0.691 (95% CI: 0.683–0.701), AIC =61,313.56; and LODDS: C-index =0.691 (95% CI: 0.682–0.700), AIC =61,315.60. We found that the nomogram incorporating LODDS had better predictive ability compared with other two methods. Furthermore, an external validation revealed a C-index of 0.753 (95% CI: 0.690–0.816) for the Asian population, which indicates the nomogram based on LODDS may have universality for both Western and Asian populations. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with pN and LNR, LODDS showed higher homeostasis in LN evaluation, and showed marked efficacy in evaluating survival differences among patients with negative LN staging. We constructed a BC prognosis model by incorporating highly relevant clinical pathological factors and a new method of LN staging, which may greatly aid in guiding postoperative treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7944312
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79443122021-03-10 Comparison of three lymph node staging methods for predicting outcome in breast cancer patients with mastectomy Wang, Meng-Shen Wang, Mo-Zhi Wang, Zhenning Song, Yongxi Gao, Peng Wang, Pengliang Wang, Chong Yu, Xueting Wei, Fengheng Guo, Jingyi Xu, Yingying Ann Transl Med Original Article BACKGROUND: Axillary lymph node (ALN) staging is essential in predicting the clinical outcome of breast cancer (BC) patients. Traditionally, it follows the tumor–node-metastasis (TNM) staging, but its accuracy needs further improvement. METHODS: A total of 9,616 BC patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database and 675 patients from the First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University underwent mastectomy together with ALN dissection were reviewed. Univariate and multivariate logistic analyses were conducted to find the most meaningful factors relevant to prognosis. RESULTS: After univariate and multivariate analyses, age, race, primary site, radiation, chemotherapy, grade, T-stage, estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), total number of positive lymph nodes (pN), positive lymph node ratio (LNR) and log odds of positive LNs (LODDS) were found to be significantly associated with overall survival (OS). Using these non-LN risk factors, we further compared the efficacy of three different ALN staging methods in prognosis via nomograms. Harrell’s concordance index (C-index) and Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) were used to measure nomogram performance of the ALN staging methods: pN: C-index=0.687 (95% CI: 0.678–0.696), AIC =61,398.24; LNR: C-index =0.691 (95% CI: 0.683–0.701), AIC =61,313.56; and LODDS: C-index =0.691 (95% CI: 0.682–0.700), AIC =61,315.60. We found that the nomogram incorporating LODDS had better predictive ability compared with other two methods. Furthermore, an external validation revealed a C-index of 0.753 (95% CI: 0.690–0.816) for the Asian population, which indicates the nomogram based on LODDS may have universality for both Western and Asian populations. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with pN and LNR, LODDS showed higher homeostasis in LN evaluation, and showed marked efficacy in evaluating survival differences among patients with negative LN staging. We constructed a BC prognosis model by incorporating highly relevant clinical pathological factors and a new method of LN staging, which may greatly aid in guiding postoperative treatment. AME Publishing Company 2021-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7944312/ /pubmed/33708927 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-4856 Text en 2021 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Wang, Meng-Shen
Wang, Mo-Zhi
Wang, Zhenning
Song, Yongxi
Gao, Peng
Wang, Pengliang
Wang, Chong
Yu, Xueting
Wei, Fengheng
Guo, Jingyi
Xu, Yingying
Comparison of three lymph node staging methods for predicting outcome in breast cancer patients with mastectomy
title Comparison of three lymph node staging methods for predicting outcome in breast cancer patients with mastectomy
title_full Comparison of three lymph node staging methods for predicting outcome in breast cancer patients with mastectomy
title_fullStr Comparison of three lymph node staging methods for predicting outcome in breast cancer patients with mastectomy
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of three lymph node staging methods for predicting outcome in breast cancer patients with mastectomy
title_short Comparison of three lymph node staging methods for predicting outcome in breast cancer patients with mastectomy
title_sort comparison of three lymph node staging methods for predicting outcome in breast cancer patients with mastectomy
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7944312/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33708927
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-4856
work_keys_str_mv AT wangmengshen comparisonofthreelymphnodestagingmethodsforpredictingoutcomeinbreastcancerpatientswithmastectomy
AT wangmozhi comparisonofthreelymphnodestagingmethodsforpredictingoutcomeinbreastcancerpatientswithmastectomy
AT wangzhenning comparisonofthreelymphnodestagingmethodsforpredictingoutcomeinbreastcancerpatientswithmastectomy
AT songyongxi comparisonofthreelymphnodestagingmethodsforpredictingoutcomeinbreastcancerpatientswithmastectomy
AT gaopeng comparisonofthreelymphnodestagingmethodsforpredictingoutcomeinbreastcancerpatientswithmastectomy
AT wangpengliang comparisonofthreelymphnodestagingmethodsforpredictingoutcomeinbreastcancerpatientswithmastectomy
AT wangchong comparisonofthreelymphnodestagingmethodsforpredictingoutcomeinbreastcancerpatientswithmastectomy
AT yuxueting comparisonofthreelymphnodestagingmethodsforpredictingoutcomeinbreastcancerpatientswithmastectomy
AT weifengheng comparisonofthreelymphnodestagingmethodsforpredictingoutcomeinbreastcancerpatientswithmastectomy
AT guojingyi comparisonofthreelymphnodestagingmethodsforpredictingoutcomeinbreastcancerpatientswithmastectomy
AT xuyingying comparisonofthreelymphnodestagingmethodsforpredictingoutcomeinbreastcancerpatientswithmastectomy