Cargando…

Italian Validation of the Chiba Interprofessional Competency Scale (CICS29)

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE WORK: The Chiba Inter-professional Competency Scale (CICS29) validated in several languages, it is a self-report instrument that investigates the degree of interprofessional collaboration in six areas: attitudes and beliefs of the professional; ability to manage a work grou...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tonarelli, Annalisa, Yamamoto, Takeshi, Foà, Chiara, Miraglia Raineri, Alessandra, Artioli, Giovanna, Baccarini, Elena, Giampellegrini, Paola, Masciangelo, Itria, Moggi, Elisa, Toni, Doriana, Valcavi, Luca, Sarli, Leopoldo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Mattioli 1885 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7944661/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32168314
http://dx.doi.org/10.23750/abm.v91i2-S.9172
_version_ 1783662716324413440
author Tonarelli, Annalisa
Yamamoto, Takeshi
Foà, Chiara
Miraglia Raineri, Alessandra
Artioli, Giovanna
Baccarini, Elena
Giampellegrini, Paola
Masciangelo, Itria
Moggi, Elisa
Toni, Doriana
Valcavi, Luca
Sarli, Leopoldo
author_facet Tonarelli, Annalisa
Yamamoto, Takeshi
Foà, Chiara
Miraglia Raineri, Alessandra
Artioli, Giovanna
Baccarini, Elena
Giampellegrini, Paola
Masciangelo, Itria
Moggi, Elisa
Toni, Doriana
Valcavi, Luca
Sarli, Leopoldo
author_sort Tonarelli, Annalisa
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE WORK: The Chiba Inter-professional Competency Scale (CICS29) validated in several languages, it is a self-report instrument that investigates the degree of interprofessional collaboration in six areas: attitudes and beliefs of the professional; ability to manage a work group; actions to achieve goals; providing assistance that respects the patient; attitudes and behaviours that improve the cohesion of the working group; fulfilling or performing the own professional role. In addition to being recent, the scale investigates collaboration among all health professionals, and is not limited to specific professionals. The aim of the study was to validate the Italian version of CICS29. METHOD: A questionnaire-based study was conducted with an Italian sample consisting of 530 health professionals (419 women, mean age = 40 years, SD = 10.7; range 23- 58 years). The internal validity was measured using factor analysis. To verify the convergent validity, the Italian Version of Interprofessional Collaborative Competency Attainment Survey (ICCAS) was correlated with the CICS29; RESULTS: The reliability and the internal validity of the CICS29 revealed 6 factors corresponding to the original subscales. The analysis presents an excellent sample adequacy measure (KMO = .933) with the scores ranging from 0.62 to 0.78 for the interclass correlation coefficients of the 6 domains. A significant level of correlation was found between the subscales of the CICS29 and the ICCAS. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, the Italian version of CICS29 has a satisfactory level of reliability and validity and it is recommended for measuring interprofessional collaboration of the health professionals. (www.actabiomedica.it)
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7944661
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Mattioli 1885
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79446612021-03-10 Italian Validation of the Chiba Interprofessional Competency Scale (CICS29) Tonarelli, Annalisa Yamamoto, Takeshi Foà, Chiara Miraglia Raineri, Alessandra Artioli, Giovanna Baccarini, Elena Giampellegrini, Paola Masciangelo, Itria Moggi, Elisa Toni, Doriana Valcavi, Luca Sarli, Leopoldo Acta Biomed Original Article: Interprofessional Competency BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE WORK: The Chiba Inter-professional Competency Scale (CICS29) validated in several languages, it is a self-report instrument that investigates the degree of interprofessional collaboration in six areas: attitudes and beliefs of the professional; ability to manage a work group; actions to achieve goals; providing assistance that respects the patient; attitudes and behaviours that improve the cohesion of the working group; fulfilling or performing the own professional role. In addition to being recent, the scale investigates collaboration among all health professionals, and is not limited to specific professionals. The aim of the study was to validate the Italian version of CICS29. METHOD: A questionnaire-based study was conducted with an Italian sample consisting of 530 health professionals (419 women, mean age = 40 years, SD = 10.7; range 23- 58 years). The internal validity was measured using factor analysis. To verify the convergent validity, the Italian Version of Interprofessional Collaborative Competency Attainment Survey (ICCAS) was correlated with the CICS29; RESULTS: The reliability and the internal validity of the CICS29 revealed 6 factors corresponding to the original subscales. The analysis presents an excellent sample adequacy measure (KMO = .933) with the scores ranging from 0.62 to 0.78 for the interclass correlation coefficients of the 6 domains. A significant level of correlation was found between the subscales of the CICS29 and the ICCAS. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, the Italian version of CICS29 has a satisfactory level of reliability and validity and it is recommended for measuring interprofessional collaboration of the health professionals. (www.actabiomedica.it) Mattioli 1885 2020 2020-03-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7944661/ /pubmed/32168314 http://dx.doi.org/10.23750/abm.v91i2-S.9172 Text en Copyright: © 2020 ACTA BIO MEDICA SOCIETY OF MEDICINE AND NATURAL SCIENCES OF PARMA http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
spellingShingle Original Article: Interprofessional Competency
Tonarelli, Annalisa
Yamamoto, Takeshi
Foà, Chiara
Miraglia Raineri, Alessandra
Artioli, Giovanna
Baccarini, Elena
Giampellegrini, Paola
Masciangelo, Itria
Moggi, Elisa
Toni, Doriana
Valcavi, Luca
Sarli, Leopoldo
Italian Validation of the Chiba Interprofessional Competency Scale (CICS29)
title Italian Validation of the Chiba Interprofessional Competency Scale (CICS29)
title_full Italian Validation of the Chiba Interprofessional Competency Scale (CICS29)
title_fullStr Italian Validation of the Chiba Interprofessional Competency Scale (CICS29)
title_full_unstemmed Italian Validation of the Chiba Interprofessional Competency Scale (CICS29)
title_short Italian Validation of the Chiba Interprofessional Competency Scale (CICS29)
title_sort italian validation of the chiba interprofessional competency scale (cics29)
topic Original Article: Interprofessional Competency
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7944661/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32168314
http://dx.doi.org/10.23750/abm.v91i2-S.9172
work_keys_str_mv AT tonarelliannalisa italianvalidationofthechibainterprofessionalcompetencyscalecics29
AT yamamototakeshi italianvalidationofthechibainterprofessionalcompetencyscalecics29
AT foachiara italianvalidationofthechibainterprofessionalcompetencyscalecics29
AT miragliarainerialessandra italianvalidationofthechibainterprofessionalcompetencyscalecics29
AT artioligiovanna italianvalidationofthechibainterprofessionalcompetencyscalecics29
AT baccarinielena italianvalidationofthechibainterprofessionalcompetencyscalecics29
AT giampellegrinipaola italianvalidationofthechibainterprofessionalcompetencyscalecics29
AT masciangeloitria italianvalidationofthechibainterprofessionalcompetencyscalecics29
AT moggielisa italianvalidationofthechibainterprofessionalcompetencyscalecics29
AT tonidoriana italianvalidationofthechibainterprofessionalcompetencyscalecics29
AT valcaviluca italianvalidationofthechibainterprofessionalcompetencyscalecics29
AT sarlileopoldo italianvalidationofthechibainterprofessionalcompetencyscalecics29