Cargando…

Imaging guided percutaneous renal biopsy: do it or not?

Since its first reported application, renal biopsy became an important part of the diagnostic algorithm, considered advantages and risks, to better manage therapeutic options. The biopsy can be performed with different techniques (open, laparoscopic, transjugular, transurethral and percutaneous). Cu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pagnini, Francesco, Cervi, Eleonora, Maestroni, Umberto, Agostini, Andrea, Borgheresi, Alessandra, Piacentino, Filippo, Angileri, Salvatore Alessio, Ierardi, Anna Maria, Floridi, Chiara, Carbone, Mattia, Ziglioli, Francesco, De Filippo, Massimo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Mattioli 1885 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7944675/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32945282
http://dx.doi.org/10.23750/abm.v91i8-S.9990
Descripción
Sumario:Since its first reported application, renal biopsy became an important part of the diagnostic algorithm, considered advantages and risks, to better manage therapeutic options. The biopsy can be performed with different techniques (open, laparoscopic, transjugular, transurethral and percutaneous). Currently, the percutaneous approach is the modality of choice. Percutaneous biopsy can be performed under CT or US guidance, but critical benefits and disadvantages have to be considered. Core needle biopsy is usually preferred to fine-needle aspiration because of the sample quality, usually obtaining multiple cores, especially in heterogeneous tumors. Principal complications are hematuria (1-10%), perinephric hematoma (10-90%), pneumothorax (0,6%), clinically significant pain (1,2%). (www.actabiomedica.it)