Cargando…

External fixation for proximal humerus fractures neer type 3 and 4: results of 17 cases

BACKGROUND: Proximal humeral fractures (PHF) account for 4-6% of all fractures and 25% of humeral fractures. While conservative treatment is the gold standard for simple fractures, there is no consensus about the best treatment choice for complex PHF in the elderly. Recently a new external fixator w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Maluta, Tommaso, Amarossi, Andrea, Dorigotti, Andrea, Bagnis, Francesco, Samaila, Elena Manuela, De Luca, Lapo, Pezzè, Lorenzo, Magnan, Bruno
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Mattioli 1885 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7944700/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33559622
http://dx.doi.org/10.23750/abm.v91i14-S.10979
_version_ 1783662725415567360
author Maluta, Tommaso
Amarossi, Andrea
Dorigotti, Andrea
Bagnis, Francesco
Samaila, Elena Manuela
De Luca, Lapo
Pezzè, Lorenzo
Magnan, Bruno
author_facet Maluta, Tommaso
Amarossi, Andrea
Dorigotti, Andrea
Bagnis, Francesco
Samaila, Elena Manuela
De Luca, Lapo
Pezzè, Lorenzo
Magnan, Bruno
author_sort Maluta, Tommaso
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Proximal humeral fractures (PHF) account for 4-6% of all fractures and 25% of humeral fractures. While conservative treatment is the gold standard for simple fractures, there is no consensus about the best treatment choice for complex PHF in the elderly. Recently a new external fixator was introduced in clinical practice for treatment of complex PHF. Aim of the study was to evaluate the functional results of this therapeutic approach. METHODS: Data were retrospectively analyzed. Inclusion criteria were: three- and four-part PHF according to Neer, treatment with closed reduction and external fixation, normal Abbreviated Mini Mental Test score, independence in the daily living, non-pathological fracture, glenohumeral joint with moderate osteoarthritic changes and availability of clinical and radiological follow-up. For each patient demographic data, comorbidities, surgery time and estimated blood loss were recorded. Clinical and radiological evaluation were performed at 1, 2, 6, 12 months. RESULTS: 17 patients were enrolled. Mean age was 69.7 years. Fractures were classified according to Neer as type III in 10 cases and type IV in 7 cases. The mean operating time was 22 minutes. Mean Constant score value at follow up was 74 ± 11,52 at 2 months, 82 ± 11,16 at 6 months and 85 ± 9,86 at 12 months. CONCLUSION: These preliminary results show that the studied system is easy to use, minimally invasive, effective in reducing surgical and hospitalization time. The results in terms of functional recovery are encouraging, showing a reduced number of complications. (www.actabiomedica.it)
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7944700
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Mattioli 1885
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79447002021-03-10 External fixation for proximal humerus fractures neer type 3 and 4: results of 17 cases Maluta, Tommaso Amarossi, Andrea Dorigotti, Andrea Bagnis, Francesco Samaila, Elena Manuela De Luca, Lapo Pezzè, Lorenzo Magnan, Bruno Acta Biomed Original Article BACKGROUND: Proximal humeral fractures (PHF) account for 4-6% of all fractures and 25% of humeral fractures. While conservative treatment is the gold standard for simple fractures, there is no consensus about the best treatment choice for complex PHF in the elderly. Recently a new external fixator was introduced in clinical practice for treatment of complex PHF. Aim of the study was to evaluate the functional results of this therapeutic approach. METHODS: Data were retrospectively analyzed. Inclusion criteria were: three- and four-part PHF according to Neer, treatment with closed reduction and external fixation, normal Abbreviated Mini Mental Test score, independence in the daily living, non-pathological fracture, glenohumeral joint with moderate osteoarthritic changes and availability of clinical and radiological follow-up. For each patient demographic data, comorbidities, surgery time and estimated blood loss were recorded. Clinical and radiological evaluation were performed at 1, 2, 6, 12 months. RESULTS: 17 patients were enrolled. Mean age was 69.7 years. Fractures were classified according to Neer as type III in 10 cases and type IV in 7 cases. The mean operating time was 22 minutes. Mean Constant score value at follow up was 74 ± 11,52 at 2 months, 82 ± 11,16 at 6 months and 85 ± 9,86 at 12 months. CONCLUSION: These preliminary results show that the studied system is easy to use, minimally invasive, effective in reducing surgical and hospitalization time. The results in terms of functional recovery are encouraging, showing a reduced number of complications. (www.actabiomedica.it) Mattioli 1885 2020 2020-12-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7944700/ /pubmed/33559622 http://dx.doi.org/10.23750/abm.v91i14-S.10979 Text en Copyright: © 2020 ACTA BIO MEDICA SOCIETY OF MEDICINE AND NATURAL SCIENCES OF PARMA http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
spellingShingle Original Article
Maluta, Tommaso
Amarossi, Andrea
Dorigotti, Andrea
Bagnis, Francesco
Samaila, Elena Manuela
De Luca, Lapo
Pezzè, Lorenzo
Magnan, Bruno
External fixation for proximal humerus fractures neer type 3 and 4: results of 17 cases
title External fixation for proximal humerus fractures neer type 3 and 4: results of 17 cases
title_full External fixation for proximal humerus fractures neer type 3 and 4: results of 17 cases
title_fullStr External fixation for proximal humerus fractures neer type 3 and 4: results of 17 cases
title_full_unstemmed External fixation for proximal humerus fractures neer type 3 and 4: results of 17 cases
title_short External fixation for proximal humerus fractures neer type 3 and 4: results of 17 cases
title_sort external fixation for proximal humerus fractures neer type 3 and 4: results of 17 cases
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7944700/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33559622
http://dx.doi.org/10.23750/abm.v91i14-S.10979
work_keys_str_mv AT malutatommaso externalfixationforproximalhumerusfracturesneertype3and4resultsof17cases
AT amarossiandrea externalfixationforproximalhumerusfracturesneertype3and4resultsof17cases
AT dorigottiandrea externalfixationforproximalhumerusfracturesneertype3and4resultsof17cases
AT bagnisfrancesco externalfixationforproximalhumerusfracturesneertype3and4resultsof17cases
AT samailaelenamanuela externalfixationforproximalhumerusfracturesneertype3and4resultsof17cases
AT delucalapo externalfixationforproximalhumerusfracturesneertype3and4resultsof17cases
AT pezzelorenzo externalfixationforproximalhumerusfracturesneertype3and4resultsof17cases
AT magnanbruno externalfixationforproximalhumerusfracturesneertype3and4resultsof17cases