Cargando…

MPFL reconstruction: indications and results

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) is the most important structure commonly injured during lateral patellar dislocation and its rupture accounts for 3% of total knee injuries. MPFL reconstruction (MPFLR) is a reliable procedure with good results but variable rates of recur...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dall’Oca, Carlo, Elena, Nicholas, Lunardelli, Enrico, Ulgelmo, Maurizio, Magnan, Bruno
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Mattioli 1885 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7944812/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32555079
http://dx.doi.org/10.23750/abm.v91i4-S.9669
_version_ 1783662748236775424
author Dall’Oca, Carlo
Elena, Nicholas
Lunardelli, Enrico
Ulgelmo, Maurizio
Magnan, Bruno
author_facet Dall’Oca, Carlo
Elena, Nicholas
Lunardelli, Enrico
Ulgelmo, Maurizio
Magnan, Bruno
author_sort Dall’Oca, Carlo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIM: The medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) is the most important structure commonly injured during lateral patellar dislocation and its rupture accounts for 3% of total knee injuries. MPFL reconstruction (MPFLR) is a reliable procedure with good results but variable rates of recurrent instability. The aim of this study is to underline the proper indications for the MPFLR reconstruction and to explain all the pearls and pitfalls regarding the MPFLR both in our experience and found in the latest literature. METHODS: A comprehensive search in the latest literature using various combinations of the keywords MPFL, MPFLR, dislocation, treatment was performed. The following data were extracted: diagnosis methods, indications and contraindications for isolated MPFLR, type of management, recurrence of instability, outcomes and complications. RESULTS: History of multiple patellar dislocations is the most relevant indication for ligament reconstruction especially after a failed course of conservative treatment in presence of persistent patello-femoral instability. Gold standard technique for MPFLR has not been clearly defined yet. CONCLUSIONS: There is still poor literature about outcome comparisons, therefore it is challenging to decide which technique is the most appropriate as surgical procedures are continuously developing. The ideal candidates for MPFLR have to be decided after a throughout evaluation and careful planning and, with nowadays knowledge, it is possible to put indication for a reconstruction exposing the patient to minimal risks. (www.actabiomedica.it)
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7944812
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Mattioli 1885
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79448122021-03-11 MPFL reconstruction: indications and results Dall’Oca, Carlo Elena, Nicholas Lunardelli, Enrico Ulgelmo, Maurizio Magnan, Bruno Acta Biomed Review BACKGROUND AND AIM: The medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) is the most important structure commonly injured during lateral patellar dislocation and its rupture accounts for 3% of total knee injuries. MPFL reconstruction (MPFLR) is a reliable procedure with good results but variable rates of recurrent instability. The aim of this study is to underline the proper indications for the MPFLR reconstruction and to explain all the pearls and pitfalls regarding the MPFLR both in our experience and found in the latest literature. METHODS: A comprehensive search in the latest literature using various combinations of the keywords MPFL, MPFLR, dislocation, treatment was performed. The following data were extracted: diagnosis methods, indications and contraindications for isolated MPFLR, type of management, recurrence of instability, outcomes and complications. RESULTS: History of multiple patellar dislocations is the most relevant indication for ligament reconstruction especially after a failed course of conservative treatment in presence of persistent patello-femoral instability. Gold standard technique for MPFLR has not been clearly defined yet. CONCLUSIONS: There is still poor literature about outcome comparisons, therefore it is challenging to decide which technique is the most appropriate as surgical procedures are continuously developing. The ideal candidates for MPFLR have to be decided after a throughout evaluation and careful planning and, with nowadays knowledge, it is possible to put indication for a reconstruction exposing the patient to minimal risks. (www.actabiomedica.it) Mattioli 1885 2020 2020-05-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7944812/ /pubmed/32555079 http://dx.doi.org/10.23750/abm.v91i4-S.9669 Text en Copyright: © 2020 ACTA BIO MEDICA SOCIETY OF MEDICINE AND NATURAL SCIENCES OF PARMA http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
spellingShingle Review
Dall’Oca, Carlo
Elena, Nicholas
Lunardelli, Enrico
Ulgelmo, Maurizio
Magnan, Bruno
MPFL reconstruction: indications and results
title MPFL reconstruction: indications and results
title_full MPFL reconstruction: indications and results
title_fullStr MPFL reconstruction: indications and results
title_full_unstemmed MPFL reconstruction: indications and results
title_short MPFL reconstruction: indications and results
title_sort mpfl reconstruction: indications and results
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7944812/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32555079
http://dx.doi.org/10.23750/abm.v91i4-S.9669
work_keys_str_mv AT dallocacarlo mpflreconstructionindicationsandresults
AT elenanicholas mpflreconstructionindicationsandresults
AT lunardellienrico mpflreconstructionindicationsandresults
AT ulgelmomaurizio mpflreconstructionindicationsandresults
AT magnanbruno mpflreconstructionindicationsandresults