Cargando…

Total ankle replacement in young patients

High physical demand and younger age are currently considered contraindications for total ankle replacement. The number of Total Ankle Replacements (TAR) is widespread increasing and indications are expanding thanks to a steady improvement in prosthetic designs and better outcome. COMMENTARY OF THE...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Samaila, Elena Manuela, Bissoli, Andrea, Argentini, Emanuele, Negri, Stefano, Colò, Gabriele, Magnan, Bruno
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Mattioli 1885 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7944830/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32555074
http://dx.doi.org/10.23750/abm.v91i4-S.9725
_version_ 1783662752436322304
author Samaila, Elena Manuela
Bissoli, Andrea
Argentini, Emanuele
Negri, Stefano
Colò, Gabriele
Magnan, Bruno
author_facet Samaila, Elena Manuela
Bissoli, Andrea
Argentini, Emanuele
Negri, Stefano
Colò, Gabriele
Magnan, Bruno
author_sort Samaila, Elena Manuela
collection PubMed
description High physical demand and younger age are currently considered contraindications for total ankle replacement. The number of Total Ankle Replacements (TAR) is widespread increasing and indications are expanding thanks to a steady improvement in prosthetic designs and better outcome. COMMENTARY OF THE LITERATURE: in 1999 a study of 100 uncemented STAR™ (Waldemar-Link, Hamburg, Germany) prostheses showed a survival rate of 75% at 6.8 years in patients under 50 years old. Other studies (es, Barg et Al.) shows the risk of failure age-related in young patients compared to older group. A report of 780 TAR from the Swedish Ankle Register showed patients with primary or post-traumatic osteoarthritis under 60 years of age to have a 1.8 higher chance of revision compared to older patients. DISCUSSION: ankle replacement has been traditionally reserved for patients older 50 years old and with low physical demand. Contrariwise this belief, TAR have already been used with a wide range of ages, sometimes even patients younger than 30 years old. Most of the “negative” score and results showed before are related to “second-generation” prosthetic designs, while recent studies used a “third-generation” prosthetic design. CONCLUSIONS: recent evidences showed better clinical results and higher satisfaction in people under the age of 50 compared to ankle arthrodesis with comparable rate of complications and survivorship. Younger people will have however a higher rate of reoperation but in the meantime, they will prevent progressive degeneration of adjacent joints. (www.actabiomedica.it)
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7944830
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Mattioli 1885
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79448302021-03-11 Total ankle replacement in young patients Samaila, Elena Manuela Bissoli, Andrea Argentini, Emanuele Negri, Stefano Colò, Gabriele Magnan, Bruno Acta Biomed Review High physical demand and younger age are currently considered contraindications for total ankle replacement. The number of Total Ankle Replacements (TAR) is widespread increasing and indications are expanding thanks to a steady improvement in prosthetic designs and better outcome. COMMENTARY OF THE LITERATURE: in 1999 a study of 100 uncemented STAR™ (Waldemar-Link, Hamburg, Germany) prostheses showed a survival rate of 75% at 6.8 years in patients under 50 years old. Other studies (es, Barg et Al.) shows the risk of failure age-related in young patients compared to older group. A report of 780 TAR from the Swedish Ankle Register showed patients with primary or post-traumatic osteoarthritis under 60 years of age to have a 1.8 higher chance of revision compared to older patients. DISCUSSION: ankle replacement has been traditionally reserved for patients older 50 years old and with low physical demand. Contrariwise this belief, TAR have already been used with a wide range of ages, sometimes even patients younger than 30 years old. Most of the “negative” score and results showed before are related to “second-generation” prosthetic designs, while recent studies used a “third-generation” prosthetic design. CONCLUSIONS: recent evidences showed better clinical results and higher satisfaction in people under the age of 50 compared to ankle arthrodesis with comparable rate of complications and survivorship. Younger people will have however a higher rate of reoperation but in the meantime, they will prevent progressive degeneration of adjacent joints. (www.actabiomedica.it) Mattioli 1885 2020 2020-05-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7944830/ /pubmed/32555074 http://dx.doi.org/10.23750/abm.v91i4-S.9725 Text en Copyright: © 2020 ACTA BIO MEDICA SOCIETY OF MEDICINE AND NATURAL SCIENCES OF PARMA http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
spellingShingle Review
Samaila, Elena Manuela
Bissoli, Andrea
Argentini, Emanuele
Negri, Stefano
Colò, Gabriele
Magnan, Bruno
Total ankle replacement in young patients
title Total ankle replacement in young patients
title_full Total ankle replacement in young patients
title_fullStr Total ankle replacement in young patients
title_full_unstemmed Total ankle replacement in young patients
title_short Total ankle replacement in young patients
title_sort total ankle replacement in young patients
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7944830/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32555074
http://dx.doi.org/10.23750/abm.v91i4-S.9725
work_keys_str_mv AT samailaelenamanuela totalanklereplacementinyoungpatients
AT bissoliandrea totalanklereplacementinyoungpatients
AT argentiniemanuele totalanklereplacementinyoungpatients
AT negristefano totalanklereplacementinyoungpatients
AT cologabriele totalanklereplacementinyoungpatients
AT magnanbruno totalanklereplacementinyoungpatients