Cargando…

A preliminary experience with a new intramedullary nail for trochanteric fractures

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE WORK: The worldwide incidence of fractures of the proximal end of the femur is increasing as the average age of the population rises. The current surgical gold treatment standard is intramedullary nail fixation. The Authors present their experience with the D-Nail system fo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Maniscalco, Pietro, Quattrini, Fabrizio, Ciatti, Corrado, Burgio, Valeria, Rivera, Fabrizio, Di Stefano, Giovanni, Pavone, Vito
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Mattioli 1885 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7944840/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32555087
http://dx.doi.org/10.23750/abm.v91i4-S.9726
_version_ 1783662754807152640
author Maniscalco, Pietro
Quattrini, Fabrizio
Ciatti, Corrado
Burgio, Valeria
Rivera, Fabrizio
Di Stefano, Giovanni
Pavone, Vito
author_facet Maniscalco, Pietro
Quattrini, Fabrizio
Ciatti, Corrado
Burgio, Valeria
Rivera, Fabrizio
Di Stefano, Giovanni
Pavone, Vito
author_sort Maniscalco, Pietro
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE WORK: The worldwide incidence of fractures of the proximal end of the femur is increasing as the average age of the population rises. The current surgical gold treatment standard is intramedullary nail fixation. The Authors present their experience with the D-Nail system for intertrochanteric femur fractures. METHODS: From January 1st to February 21st 2020 (breakout of COVID-19 pandemic) 34 patients were treated with the D-Nail system: 11 with basicervical fractures, 16 with intertrochanteric stable fractures and 7 with intertrochanteric unstable fractures. In 11 cases, a single cephalic screw was used; in 23 cases, two of them were used. Distal locking was executed in 7 patients. Follow-up time ranged from 2 to 3 months. RESULTS: None of the reported intra- or post-operative complication was linked to the fixation device or the surgical technique. Patients were monitored with clinical and radiological checkups using modified Harris Hip Score to accurately evaluate the fluctuations in the rehabilitation period. CONCLUSION: The main advantages of this synthesis device are the proximal hole’s peculiar shape, which allows the possibility to position one or two cephalic screws on the same nail, and the silicon coating, which provides numerous biological advantages. Distal locking was executed in selected cases only, based on fracture type. Optimum treatment involves rapid execution of surgery, minimal trauma during surgery, maximum mechanical stability, and rapid weight-bearing. Although our case number is small and follow-up time brief, our results are encouraging. (www.actabiomedica.it)
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7944840
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Mattioli 1885
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79448402021-03-11 A preliminary experience with a new intramedullary nail for trochanteric fractures Maniscalco, Pietro Quattrini, Fabrizio Ciatti, Corrado Burgio, Valeria Rivera, Fabrizio Di Stefano, Giovanni Pavone, Vito Acta Biomed Original Article BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE WORK: The worldwide incidence of fractures of the proximal end of the femur is increasing as the average age of the population rises. The current surgical gold treatment standard is intramedullary nail fixation. The Authors present their experience with the D-Nail system for intertrochanteric femur fractures. METHODS: From January 1st to February 21st 2020 (breakout of COVID-19 pandemic) 34 patients were treated with the D-Nail system: 11 with basicervical fractures, 16 with intertrochanteric stable fractures and 7 with intertrochanteric unstable fractures. In 11 cases, a single cephalic screw was used; in 23 cases, two of them were used. Distal locking was executed in 7 patients. Follow-up time ranged from 2 to 3 months. RESULTS: None of the reported intra- or post-operative complication was linked to the fixation device or the surgical technique. Patients were monitored with clinical and radiological checkups using modified Harris Hip Score to accurately evaluate the fluctuations in the rehabilitation period. CONCLUSION: The main advantages of this synthesis device are the proximal hole’s peculiar shape, which allows the possibility to position one or two cephalic screws on the same nail, and the silicon coating, which provides numerous biological advantages. Distal locking was executed in selected cases only, based on fracture type. Optimum treatment involves rapid execution of surgery, minimal trauma during surgery, maximum mechanical stability, and rapid weight-bearing. Although our case number is small and follow-up time brief, our results are encouraging. (www.actabiomedica.it) Mattioli 1885 2020 2020-05-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7944840/ /pubmed/32555087 http://dx.doi.org/10.23750/abm.v91i4-S.9726 Text en Copyright: © 2020 ACTA BIO MEDICA SOCIETY OF MEDICINE AND NATURAL SCIENCES OF PARMA http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
spellingShingle Original Article
Maniscalco, Pietro
Quattrini, Fabrizio
Ciatti, Corrado
Burgio, Valeria
Rivera, Fabrizio
Di Stefano, Giovanni
Pavone, Vito
A preliminary experience with a new intramedullary nail for trochanteric fractures
title A preliminary experience with a new intramedullary nail for trochanteric fractures
title_full A preliminary experience with a new intramedullary nail for trochanteric fractures
title_fullStr A preliminary experience with a new intramedullary nail for trochanteric fractures
title_full_unstemmed A preliminary experience with a new intramedullary nail for trochanteric fractures
title_short A preliminary experience with a new intramedullary nail for trochanteric fractures
title_sort preliminary experience with a new intramedullary nail for trochanteric fractures
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7944840/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32555087
http://dx.doi.org/10.23750/abm.v91i4-S.9726
work_keys_str_mv AT maniscalcopietro apreliminaryexperiencewithanewintramedullarynailfortrochantericfractures
AT quattrinifabrizio apreliminaryexperiencewithanewintramedullarynailfortrochantericfractures
AT ciatticorrado apreliminaryexperiencewithanewintramedullarynailfortrochantericfractures
AT burgiovaleria apreliminaryexperiencewithanewintramedullarynailfortrochantericfractures
AT riverafabrizio apreliminaryexperiencewithanewintramedullarynailfortrochantericfractures
AT distefanogiovanni apreliminaryexperiencewithanewintramedullarynailfortrochantericfractures
AT pavonevito apreliminaryexperiencewithanewintramedullarynailfortrochantericfractures
AT maniscalcopietro preliminaryexperiencewithanewintramedullarynailfortrochantericfractures
AT quattrinifabrizio preliminaryexperiencewithanewintramedullarynailfortrochantericfractures
AT ciatticorrado preliminaryexperiencewithanewintramedullarynailfortrochantericfractures
AT burgiovaleria preliminaryexperiencewithanewintramedullarynailfortrochantericfractures
AT riverafabrizio preliminaryexperiencewithanewintramedullarynailfortrochantericfractures
AT distefanogiovanni preliminaryexperiencewithanewintramedullarynailfortrochantericfractures
AT pavonevito preliminaryexperiencewithanewintramedullarynailfortrochantericfractures