Cargando…

Impact of surgical resection rate on survival in gastric cancer: nationwide study

BACKGROUND: There are marked geographical variations in the proportion of patients undergoing resection for gastric cancer. This study investigated the impact of resection rate on survival. METHODS: All patients with potentially curable gastric cancer between 2006 and 2017 were identified from the S...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kung, C -H, Jestin Hannan, C, Linder, G, Johansson, J, Nilsson, M, Hedberg, J, Lindblad, M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7944854/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33688944
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zraa017
_version_ 1783662757835440128
author Kung, C -H
Jestin Hannan, C
Linder, G
Johansson, J
Nilsson, M
Hedberg, J
Lindblad, M
author_facet Kung, C -H
Jestin Hannan, C
Linder, G
Johansson, J
Nilsson, M
Hedberg, J
Lindblad, M
author_sort Kung, C -H
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There are marked geographical variations in the proportion of patients undergoing resection for gastric cancer. This study investigated the impact of resection rate on survival. METHODS: All patients with potentially curable gastric cancer between 2006 and 2017 were identified from the Swedish National Register of Oesophageal and Gastric Cancer. The annual resection rate was calculated for each county per year. Resection rates in all counties for all years were grouped into tertiles and classified as low, intermediate or high. Survival was analysed using the Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: A total of 3465 patients were diagnosed with potentially curable gastric cancer, and 1934 (55.8 per cent) were resected. Resection rates in the low (1261 patients), intermediate (1141) and high (1063) tertiles were 0–50.0, 50.1–62.5 and 62.6–100 per cent respectively. The multivariable Cox analysis revealed better survival for patients diagnosed in counties during years with an intermediate versus low resection rate (hazard ratio (HR) 0.81, 95 per cent c.i. 0.74 to 0.90; P < 0.001) and high versus low resection rate (HR 0.80, 0.73 to 0.88; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: This national register study showed large regional variation in resection rates for gastric cancer. A higher resection rate appeared to be beneficial with regard to overall survival for the entire population.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7944854
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79448542021-03-16 Impact of surgical resection rate on survival in gastric cancer: nationwide study Kung, C -H Jestin Hannan, C Linder, G Johansson, J Nilsson, M Hedberg, J Lindblad, M BJS Open Original Article BACKGROUND: There are marked geographical variations in the proportion of patients undergoing resection for gastric cancer. This study investigated the impact of resection rate on survival. METHODS: All patients with potentially curable gastric cancer between 2006 and 2017 were identified from the Swedish National Register of Oesophageal and Gastric Cancer. The annual resection rate was calculated for each county per year. Resection rates in all counties for all years were grouped into tertiles and classified as low, intermediate or high. Survival was analysed using the Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: A total of 3465 patients were diagnosed with potentially curable gastric cancer, and 1934 (55.8 per cent) were resected. Resection rates in the low (1261 patients), intermediate (1141) and high (1063) tertiles were 0–50.0, 50.1–62.5 and 62.6–100 per cent respectively. The multivariable Cox analysis revealed better survival for patients diagnosed in counties during years with an intermediate versus low resection rate (hazard ratio (HR) 0.81, 95 per cent c.i. 0.74 to 0.90; P < 0.001) and high versus low resection rate (HR 0.80, 0.73 to 0.88; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: This national register study showed large regional variation in resection rates for gastric cancer. A higher resection rate appeared to be beneficial with regard to overall survival for the entire population. Oxford University Press 2020-12-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7944854/ /pubmed/33688944 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zraa017 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of BJS Society Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Original Article
Kung, C -H
Jestin Hannan, C
Linder, G
Johansson, J
Nilsson, M
Hedberg, J
Lindblad, M
Impact of surgical resection rate on survival in gastric cancer: nationwide study
title Impact of surgical resection rate on survival in gastric cancer: nationwide study
title_full Impact of surgical resection rate on survival in gastric cancer: nationwide study
title_fullStr Impact of surgical resection rate on survival in gastric cancer: nationwide study
title_full_unstemmed Impact of surgical resection rate on survival in gastric cancer: nationwide study
title_short Impact of surgical resection rate on survival in gastric cancer: nationwide study
title_sort impact of surgical resection rate on survival in gastric cancer: nationwide study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7944854/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33688944
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zraa017
work_keys_str_mv AT kungch impactofsurgicalresectionrateonsurvivalingastriccancernationwidestudy
AT jestinhannanc impactofsurgicalresectionrateonsurvivalingastriccancernationwidestudy
AT linderg impactofsurgicalresectionrateonsurvivalingastriccancernationwidestudy
AT johanssonj impactofsurgicalresectionrateonsurvivalingastriccancernationwidestudy
AT nilssonm impactofsurgicalresectionrateonsurvivalingastriccancernationwidestudy
AT hedbergj impactofsurgicalresectionrateonsurvivalingastriccancernationwidestudy
AT lindbladm impactofsurgicalresectionrateonsurvivalingastriccancernationwidestudy