Cargando…
Impact of surgical resection rate on survival in gastric cancer: nationwide study
BACKGROUND: There are marked geographical variations in the proportion of patients undergoing resection for gastric cancer. This study investigated the impact of resection rate on survival. METHODS: All patients with potentially curable gastric cancer between 2006 and 2017 were identified from the S...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7944854/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33688944 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zraa017 |
_version_ | 1783662757835440128 |
---|---|
author | Kung, C -H Jestin Hannan, C Linder, G Johansson, J Nilsson, M Hedberg, J Lindblad, M |
author_facet | Kung, C -H Jestin Hannan, C Linder, G Johansson, J Nilsson, M Hedberg, J Lindblad, M |
author_sort | Kung, C -H |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: There are marked geographical variations in the proportion of patients undergoing resection for gastric cancer. This study investigated the impact of resection rate on survival. METHODS: All patients with potentially curable gastric cancer between 2006 and 2017 were identified from the Swedish National Register of Oesophageal and Gastric Cancer. The annual resection rate was calculated for each county per year. Resection rates in all counties for all years were grouped into tertiles and classified as low, intermediate or high. Survival was analysed using the Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: A total of 3465 patients were diagnosed with potentially curable gastric cancer, and 1934 (55.8 per cent) were resected. Resection rates in the low (1261 patients), intermediate (1141) and high (1063) tertiles were 0–50.0, 50.1–62.5 and 62.6–100 per cent respectively. The multivariable Cox analysis revealed better survival for patients diagnosed in counties during years with an intermediate versus low resection rate (hazard ratio (HR) 0.81, 95 per cent c.i. 0.74 to 0.90; P < 0.001) and high versus low resection rate (HR 0.80, 0.73 to 0.88; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: This national register study showed large regional variation in resection rates for gastric cancer. A higher resection rate appeared to be beneficial with regard to overall survival for the entire population. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7944854 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79448542021-03-16 Impact of surgical resection rate on survival in gastric cancer: nationwide study Kung, C -H Jestin Hannan, C Linder, G Johansson, J Nilsson, M Hedberg, J Lindblad, M BJS Open Original Article BACKGROUND: There are marked geographical variations in the proportion of patients undergoing resection for gastric cancer. This study investigated the impact of resection rate on survival. METHODS: All patients with potentially curable gastric cancer between 2006 and 2017 were identified from the Swedish National Register of Oesophageal and Gastric Cancer. The annual resection rate was calculated for each county per year. Resection rates in all counties for all years were grouped into tertiles and classified as low, intermediate or high. Survival was analysed using the Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: A total of 3465 patients were diagnosed with potentially curable gastric cancer, and 1934 (55.8 per cent) were resected. Resection rates in the low (1261 patients), intermediate (1141) and high (1063) tertiles were 0–50.0, 50.1–62.5 and 62.6–100 per cent respectively. The multivariable Cox analysis revealed better survival for patients diagnosed in counties during years with an intermediate versus low resection rate (hazard ratio (HR) 0.81, 95 per cent c.i. 0.74 to 0.90; P < 0.001) and high versus low resection rate (HR 0.80, 0.73 to 0.88; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: This national register study showed large regional variation in resection rates for gastric cancer. A higher resection rate appeared to be beneficial with regard to overall survival for the entire population. Oxford University Press 2020-12-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7944854/ /pubmed/33688944 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zraa017 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of BJS Society Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Original Article Kung, C -H Jestin Hannan, C Linder, G Johansson, J Nilsson, M Hedberg, J Lindblad, M Impact of surgical resection rate on survival in gastric cancer: nationwide study |
title | Impact of surgical resection rate on survival in gastric cancer: nationwide study |
title_full | Impact of surgical resection rate on survival in gastric cancer: nationwide study |
title_fullStr | Impact of surgical resection rate on survival in gastric cancer: nationwide study |
title_full_unstemmed | Impact of surgical resection rate on survival in gastric cancer: nationwide study |
title_short | Impact of surgical resection rate on survival in gastric cancer: nationwide study |
title_sort | impact of surgical resection rate on survival in gastric cancer: nationwide study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7944854/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33688944 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zraa017 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kungch impactofsurgicalresectionrateonsurvivalingastriccancernationwidestudy AT jestinhannanc impactofsurgicalresectionrateonsurvivalingastriccancernationwidestudy AT linderg impactofsurgicalresectionrateonsurvivalingastriccancernationwidestudy AT johanssonj impactofsurgicalresectionrateonsurvivalingastriccancernationwidestudy AT nilssonm impactofsurgicalresectionrateonsurvivalingastriccancernationwidestudy AT hedbergj impactofsurgicalresectionrateonsurvivalingastriccancernationwidestudy AT lindbladm impactofsurgicalresectionrateonsurvivalingastriccancernationwidestudy |