Cargando…

Using machine learning to improve risk prediction in durable left ventricular assist devices

Risk models have historically displayed only moderate predictive performance in estimating mortality risk in left ventricular assist device therapy. This study evaluated whether machine learning can improve risk prediction for left ventricular assist devices. Primary durable left ventricular assist...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kilic, Arman, Dochtermann, Daniel, Padman, Rema, Miller, James K., Dubrawski, Artur
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7946192/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33690687
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0247866
_version_ 1783663000676204544
author Kilic, Arman
Dochtermann, Daniel
Padman, Rema
Miller, James K.
Dubrawski, Artur
author_facet Kilic, Arman
Dochtermann, Daniel
Padman, Rema
Miller, James K.
Dubrawski, Artur
author_sort Kilic, Arman
collection PubMed
description Risk models have historically displayed only moderate predictive performance in estimating mortality risk in left ventricular assist device therapy. This study evaluated whether machine learning can improve risk prediction for left ventricular assist devices. Primary durable left ventricular assist devices reported in the Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support between March 1, 2006 and December 31, 2016 were included. The study cohort was randomly divided 3:1 into training and testing sets. Logistic regression and machine learning models (extreme gradient boosting) were created in the training set for 90-day and 1-year mortality and their performance was evaluated after bootstrapping with 1000 replications in the testing set. Differences in model performance were also evaluated in cases of concordance versus discordance in predicted risk between logistic regression and extreme gradient boosting as defined by equal size patient tertiles. A total of 16,120 patients were included. Calibration metrics were comparable between logistic regression and extreme gradient boosting. C-index was improved with extreme gradient boosting (90-day: 0.707 [0.683–0.730] versus 0.740 [0.717–0.762] and 1-year: 0.691 [0.673–0.710] versus 0.714 [0.695–0.734]; each p<0.001). Net reclassification index analysis similarly demonstrated an improvement of 48.8% and 36.9% for 90-day and 1-year mortality, respectively, with extreme gradient boosting (each p<0.001). Concordance in predicted risk between logistic regression and extreme gradient boosting resulted in substantially improved c-index for both logistic regression and extreme gradient boosting (90-day logistic regression 0.536 versus 0.752, 1-year logistic regression 0.555 versus 0.726, 90-day extreme gradient boosting 0.623 versus 0.772, 1-year extreme gradient boosting 0.613 versus 0.742, each p<0.001). These results demonstrate that machine learning can improve risk model performance for durable left ventricular assist devices, both independently and as an adjunct to logistic regression.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7946192
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79461922021-03-19 Using machine learning to improve risk prediction in durable left ventricular assist devices Kilic, Arman Dochtermann, Daniel Padman, Rema Miller, James K. Dubrawski, Artur PLoS One Research Article Risk models have historically displayed only moderate predictive performance in estimating mortality risk in left ventricular assist device therapy. This study evaluated whether machine learning can improve risk prediction for left ventricular assist devices. Primary durable left ventricular assist devices reported in the Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support between March 1, 2006 and December 31, 2016 were included. The study cohort was randomly divided 3:1 into training and testing sets. Logistic regression and machine learning models (extreme gradient boosting) were created in the training set for 90-day and 1-year mortality and their performance was evaluated after bootstrapping with 1000 replications in the testing set. Differences in model performance were also evaluated in cases of concordance versus discordance in predicted risk between logistic regression and extreme gradient boosting as defined by equal size patient tertiles. A total of 16,120 patients were included. Calibration metrics were comparable between logistic regression and extreme gradient boosting. C-index was improved with extreme gradient boosting (90-day: 0.707 [0.683–0.730] versus 0.740 [0.717–0.762] and 1-year: 0.691 [0.673–0.710] versus 0.714 [0.695–0.734]; each p<0.001). Net reclassification index analysis similarly demonstrated an improvement of 48.8% and 36.9% for 90-day and 1-year mortality, respectively, with extreme gradient boosting (each p<0.001). Concordance in predicted risk between logistic regression and extreme gradient boosting resulted in substantially improved c-index for both logistic regression and extreme gradient boosting (90-day logistic regression 0.536 versus 0.752, 1-year logistic regression 0.555 versus 0.726, 90-day extreme gradient boosting 0.623 versus 0.772, 1-year extreme gradient boosting 0.613 versus 0.742, each p<0.001). These results demonstrate that machine learning can improve risk model performance for durable left ventricular assist devices, both independently and as an adjunct to logistic regression. Public Library of Science 2021-03-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7946192/ /pubmed/33690687 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0247866 Text en © 2021 Kilic et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kilic, Arman
Dochtermann, Daniel
Padman, Rema
Miller, James K.
Dubrawski, Artur
Using machine learning to improve risk prediction in durable left ventricular assist devices
title Using machine learning to improve risk prediction in durable left ventricular assist devices
title_full Using machine learning to improve risk prediction in durable left ventricular assist devices
title_fullStr Using machine learning to improve risk prediction in durable left ventricular assist devices
title_full_unstemmed Using machine learning to improve risk prediction in durable left ventricular assist devices
title_short Using machine learning to improve risk prediction in durable left ventricular assist devices
title_sort using machine learning to improve risk prediction in durable left ventricular assist devices
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7946192/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33690687
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0247866
work_keys_str_mv AT kilicarman usingmachinelearningtoimproveriskpredictionindurableleftventricularassistdevices
AT dochtermanndaniel usingmachinelearningtoimproveriskpredictionindurableleftventricularassistdevices
AT padmanrema usingmachinelearningtoimproveriskpredictionindurableleftventricularassistdevices
AT millerjamesk usingmachinelearningtoimproveriskpredictionindurableleftventricularassistdevices
AT dubrawskiartur usingmachinelearningtoimproveriskpredictionindurableleftventricularassistdevices