Cargando…
Implementation of the acutely presenting older patient (APOP) screening program in routine emergency department care: A before-after study
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of implementation of the acutely presenting older patient (APOP) screening program for older patients in routine emergency department (ED) care shortly after implementation. METHODS: We conducted an implementation study with before-after d...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Medizin
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7946672/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33471176 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00391-020-01837-9 |
_version_ | 1783663099524415488 |
---|---|
author | Blomaard, Laura C. de Groot, Bas Lucke, Jacinta A. de Gelder, Jelle Booijen, Anja M. Gussekloo, Jacobijn Mooijaart, Simon P. |
author_facet | Blomaard, Laura C. de Groot, Bas Lucke, Jacinta A. de Gelder, Jelle Booijen, Anja M. Gussekloo, Jacobijn Mooijaart, Simon P. |
author_sort | Blomaard, Laura C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of implementation of the acutely presenting older patient (APOP) screening program for older patients in routine emergency department (ED) care shortly after implementation. METHODS: We conducted an implementation study with before-after design, using the plan-do-study-act (PDSA) model for quality improvement, in the ED of a Dutch academic hospital. All consecutive patients ≥ 70 years during 2 months before and after implementation were included. The APOP program comprises screening for risk of functional decline, mortality and cognitive impairment, targeted interventions for high-risk patients and education of professionals. Outcome measures were compliance with interventions and impact on ED process, length of stay (LOS) and hospital admission rate. RESULTS: Two comparable groups of patients (median age 77 years) were included before (n = 920) and after (n = 953) implementation. After implementation 560 (59%) patients were screened of which 190 (34%) were high-risk patients. Some of the program interventions for high-risk patients in the ED were adhered to, some were not. More hospitalized patients received comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) after implementation (21% before vs. 31% after; p = 0.002). In 89% of high-risk patients who were discharged to home, telephone follow-up was initiated. Implementation did not influence median ED LOS (202 min before vs. 196 min after; p = 0.152) or hospital admission rate (40% before vs. 39% after; p = 0.410). CONCLUSION: Implementation of the APOP screening program in routine ED care did not negatively impact the ED process and resulted in an increase of CGA and telephone follow-up in older patients. Future studies should investigate whether sustainable changes in management and patient outcomes occur after more PDSA cycles. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00391-020-01837-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7946672 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Medizin |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79466722021-03-28 Implementation of the acutely presenting older patient (APOP) screening program in routine emergency department care: A before-after study Blomaard, Laura C. de Groot, Bas Lucke, Jacinta A. de Gelder, Jelle Booijen, Anja M. Gussekloo, Jacobijn Mooijaart, Simon P. Z Gerontol Geriatr Themenschwerpunkt OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of implementation of the acutely presenting older patient (APOP) screening program for older patients in routine emergency department (ED) care shortly after implementation. METHODS: We conducted an implementation study with before-after design, using the plan-do-study-act (PDSA) model for quality improvement, in the ED of a Dutch academic hospital. All consecutive patients ≥ 70 years during 2 months before and after implementation were included. The APOP program comprises screening for risk of functional decline, mortality and cognitive impairment, targeted interventions for high-risk patients and education of professionals. Outcome measures were compliance with interventions and impact on ED process, length of stay (LOS) and hospital admission rate. RESULTS: Two comparable groups of patients (median age 77 years) were included before (n = 920) and after (n = 953) implementation. After implementation 560 (59%) patients were screened of which 190 (34%) were high-risk patients. Some of the program interventions for high-risk patients in the ED were adhered to, some were not. More hospitalized patients received comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) after implementation (21% before vs. 31% after; p = 0.002). In 89% of high-risk patients who were discharged to home, telephone follow-up was initiated. Implementation did not influence median ED LOS (202 min before vs. 196 min after; p = 0.152) or hospital admission rate (40% before vs. 39% after; p = 0.410). CONCLUSION: Implementation of the APOP screening program in routine ED care did not negatively impact the ED process and resulted in an increase of CGA and telephone follow-up in older patients. Future studies should investigate whether sustainable changes in management and patient outcomes occur after more PDSA cycles. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00391-020-01837-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Medizin 2021-01-20 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7946672/ /pubmed/33471176 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00391-020-01837-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Themenschwerpunkt Blomaard, Laura C. de Groot, Bas Lucke, Jacinta A. de Gelder, Jelle Booijen, Anja M. Gussekloo, Jacobijn Mooijaart, Simon P. Implementation of the acutely presenting older patient (APOP) screening program in routine emergency department care: A before-after study |
title | Implementation of the acutely presenting older patient (APOP) screening program in routine emergency department care: A before-after study |
title_full | Implementation of the acutely presenting older patient (APOP) screening program in routine emergency department care: A before-after study |
title_fullStr | Implementation of the acutely presenting older patient (APOP) screening program in routine emergency department care: A before-after study |
title_full_unstemmed | Implementation of the acutely presenting older patient (APOP) screening program in routine emergency department care: A before-after study |
title_short | Implementation of the acutely presenting older patient (APOP) screening program in routine emergency department care: A before-after study |
title_sort | implementation of the acutely presenting older patient (apop) screening program in routine emergency department care: a before-after study |
topic | Themenschwerpunkt |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7946672/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33471176 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00391-020-01837-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT blomaardlaurac implementationoftheacutelypresentingolderpatientapopscreeningprograminroutineemergencydepartmentcareabeforeafterstudy AT degrootbas implementationoftheacutelypresentingolderpatientapopscreeningprograminroutineemergencydepartmentcareabeforeafterstudy AT luckejacintaa implementationoftheacutelypresentingolderpatientapopscreeningprograminroutineemergencydepartmentcareabeforeafterstudy AT degelderjelle implementationoftheacutelypresentingolderpatientapopscreeningprograminroutineemergencydepartmentcareabeforeafterstudy AT booijenanjam implementationoftheacutelypresentingolderpatientapopscreeningprograminroutineemergencydepartmentcareabeforeafterstudy AT gussekloojacobijn implementationoftheacutelypresentingolderpatientapopscreeningprograminroutineemergencydepartmentcareabeforeafterstudy AT mooijaartsimonp implementationoftheacutelypresentingolderpatientapopscreeningprograminroutineemergencydepartmentcareabeforeafterstudy |