Cargando…

Implementation of the acutely presenting older patient (APOP) screening program in routine emergency department care: A before-after study

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of implementation of the acutely presenting older patient (APOP) screening program for older patients in routine emergency department (ED) care shortly after implementation. METHODS: We conducted an implementation study with before-after d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Blomaard, Laura C., de Groot, Bas, Lucke, Jacinta A., de Gelder, Jelle, Booijen, Anja M., Gussekloo, Jacobijn, Mooijaart, Simon P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Medizin 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7946672/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33471176
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00391-020-01837-9
_version_ 1783663099524415488
author Blomaard, Laura C.
de Groot, Bas
Lucke, Jacinta A.
de Gelder, Jelle
Booijen, Anja M.
Gussekloo, Jacobijn
Mooijaart, Simon P.
author_facet Blomaard, Laura C.
de Groot, Bas
Lucke, Jacinta A.
de Gelder, Jelle
Booijen, Anja M.
Gussekloo, Jacobijn
Mooijaart, Simon P.
author_sort Blomaard, Laura C.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of implementation of the acutely presenting older patient (APOP) screening program for older patients in routine emergency department (ED) care shortly after implementation. METHODS: We conducted an implementation study with before-after design, using the plan-do-study-act (PDSA) model for quality improvement, in the ED of a Dutch academic hospital. All consecutive patients ≥ 70 years during 2 months before and after implementation were included. The APOP program comprises screening for risk of functional decline, mortality and cognitive impairment, targeted interventions for high-risk patients and education of professionals. Outcome measures were compliance with interventions and impact on ED process, length of stay (LOS) and hospital admission rate. RESULTS: Two comparable groups of patients (median age 77 years) were included before (n = 920) and after (n = 953) implementation. After implementation 560 (59%) patients were screened of which 190 (34%) were high-risk patients. Some of the program interventions for high-risk patients in the ED were adhered to, some were not. More hospitalized patients received comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) after implementation (21% before vs. 31% after; p = 0.002). In 89% of high-risk patients who were discharged to home, telephone follow-up was initiated. Implementation did not influence median ED LOS (202 min before vs. 196 min after; p = 0.152) or hospital admission rate (40% before vs. 39% after; p = 0.410). CONCLUSION: Implementation of the APOP screening program in routine ED care did not negatively impact the ED process and resulted in an increase of CGA and telephone follow-up in older patients. Future studies should investigate whether sustainable changes in management and patient outcomes occur after more PDSA cycles. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00391-020-01837-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7946672
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Medizin
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79466722021-03-28 Implementation of the acutely presenting older patient (APOP) screening program in routine emergency department care: A before-after study Blomaard, Laura C. de Groot, Bas Lucke, Jacinta A. de Gelder, Jelle Booijen, Anja M. Gussekloo, Jacobijn Mooijaart, Simon P. Z Gerontol Geriatr Themenschwerpunkt OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of implementation of the acutely presenting older patient (APOP) screening program for older patients in routine emergency department (ED) care shortly after implementation. METHODS: We conducted an implementation study with before-after design, using the plan-do-study-act (PDSA) model for quality improvement, in the ED of a Dutch academic hospital. All consecutive patients ≥ 70 years during 2 months before and after implementation were included. The APOP program comprises screening for risk of functional decline, mortality and cognitive impairment, targeted interventions for high-risk patients and education of professionals. Outcome measures were compliance with interventions and impact on ED process, length of stay (LOS) and hospital admission rate. RESULTS: Two comparable groups of patients (median age 77 years) were included before (n = 920) and after (n = 953) implementation. After implementation 560 (59%) patients were screened of which 190 (34%) were high-risk patients. Some of the program interventions for high-risk patients in the ED were adhered to, some were not. More hospitalized patients received comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) after implementation (21% before vs. 31% after; p = 0.002). In 89% of high-risk patients who were discharged to home, telephone follow-up was initiated. Implementation did not influence median ED LOS (202 min before vs. 196 min after; p = 0.152) or hospital admission rate (40% before vs. 39% after; p = 0.410). CONCLUSION: Implementation of the APOP screening program in routine ED care did not negatively impact the ED process and resulted in an increase of CGA and telephone follow-up in older patients. Future studies should investigate whether sustainable changes in management and patient outcomes occur after more PDSA cycles. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00391-020-01837-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Medizin 2021-01-20 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7946672/ /pubmed/33471176 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00391-020-01837-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Themenschwerpunkt
Blomaard, Laura C.
de Groot, Bas
Lucke, Jacinta A.
de Gelder, Jelle
Booijen, Anja M.
Gussekloo, Jacobijn
Mooijaart, Simon P.
Implementation of the acutely presenting older patient (APOP) screening program in routine emergency department care: A before-after study
title Implementation of the acutely presenting older patient (APOP) screening program in routine emergency department care: A before-after study
title_full Implementation of the acutely presenting older patient (APOP) screening program in routine emergency department care: A before-after study
title_fullStr Implementation of the acutely presenting older patient (APOP) screening program in routine emergency department care: A before-after study
title_full_unstemmed Implementation of the acutely presenting older patient (APOP) screening program in routine emergency department care: A before-after study
title_short Implementation of the acutely presenting older patient (APOP) screening program in routine emergency department care: A before-after study
title_sort implementation of the acutely presenting older patient (apop) screening program in routine emergency department care: a before-after study
topic Themenschwerpunkt
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7946672/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33471176
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00391-020-01837-9
work_keys_str_mv AT blomaardlaurac implementationoftheacutelypresentingolderpatientapopscreeningprograminroutineemergencydepartmentcareabeforeafterstudy
AT degrootbas implementationoftheacutelypresentingolderpatientapopscreeningprograminroutineemergencydepartmentcareabeforeafterstudy
AT luckejacintaa implementationoftheacutelypresentingolderpatientapopscreeningprograminroutineemergencydepartmentcareabeforeafterstudy
AT degelderjelle implementationoftheacutelypresentingolderpatientapopscreeningprograminroutineemergencydepartmentcareabeforeafterstudy
AT booijenanjam implementationoftheacutelypresentingolderpatientapopscreeningprograminroutineemergencydepartmentcareabeforeafterstudy
AT gussekloojacobijn implementationoftheacutelypresentingolderpatientapopscreeningprograminroutineemergencydepartmentcareabeforeafterstudy
AT mooijaartsimonp implementationoftheacutelypresentingolderpatientapopscreeningprograminroutineemergencydepartmentcareabeforeafterstudy