Cargando…

Cost-Effectiveness of Direct Non-Vitamin K Oral Anticoagulants Versus Vitamin K Antagonists for the Management of Patients with Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation Based on Available “Real-World” Evidence: The Italian National Health System Perspective

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The increasing availability of real-world evidence (RWE) about safety and effectiveness of direct non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for the management of atrial fibrillation (AF) offers the opportunity to better understand the clinical and economic implications of D...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lorenzoni, Valentina, Pirri, Salvatore, Turchetti, Giuseppe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7946694/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33587284
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40261-021-01002-z
_version_ 1783663104154927104
author Lorenzoni, Valentina
Pirri, Salvatore
Turchetti, Giuseppe
author_facet Lorenzoni, Valentina
Pirri, Salvatore
Turchetti, Giuseppe
author_sort Lorenzoni, Valentina
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The increasing availability of real-world evidence (RWE) about safety and effectiveness of direct non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for the management of atrial fibrillation (AF) offers the opportunity to better understand the clinical and economic implications of DOACs versus vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). The objective of this study was to compare the economic implications of DOACs and VKAs using data from real-world evidence in patients with AF. METHODS: A Markov model simulating the lifetime course of patients diagnosed with non-valvular AF was used to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of DOACs (i.e., rivaroxaban, dabigatran and apixaban) versus VKAs from the Italian National Health System (INHS) perspective. The model was made up of data from the literature and a meta-analysis of RWE on the incidence of stroke/systemic embolism (SE), major bleeding (MB), intracranial haemorrhage (ICH) and all-cause mortality (ACM); direct costs included drug costs, costs for drug monitoring, and management of events from official national lists. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA) were used to assess the robustness of the results. RESULTS: Results from the meta-analysis showed that apixaban had a high probability of being the most effective for stroke/SE, MB and ACM. Despite their higher acquisition costs, the cost-effectiveness analysis showed all DOACs involved a saving when compared with VKAs, with per-patient savings ranging between €4647 (rivaroxaban) to €6086 (apixaban). Moreover, all DOACs indicated a gain both in quality-adjusted life-years and life-years. According to PSA, findings related to apixaban were consistent, while for dabigatran and rivaroxaban PSA revealed a higher degree of uncertainty. CONCLUSIONS: The beneficial effect of DOACs on containing events showed in RWE had the potential to offset drug-related costs, thus improving the sustainability of treatment for non-valvular AF in daily clinical practice. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40261-021-01002-z.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7946694
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79466942021-03-28 Cost-Effectiveness of Direct Non-Vitamin K Oral Anticoagulants Versus Vitamin K Antagonists for the Management of Patients with Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation Based on Available “Real-World” Evidence: The Italian National Health System Perspective Lorenzoni, Valentina Pirri, Salvatore Turchetti, Giuseppe Clin Drug Investig Original Research Article BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The increasing availability of real-world evidence (RWE) about safety and effectiveness of direct non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for the management of atrial fibrillation (AF) offers the opportunity to better understand the clinical and economic implications of DOACs versus vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). The objective of this study was to compare the economic implications of DOACs and VKAs using data from real-world evidence in patients with AF. METHODS: A Markov model simulating the lifetime course of patients diagnosed with non-valvular AF was used to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of DOACs (i.e., rivaroxaban, dabigatran and apixaban) versus VKAs from the Italian National Health System (INHS) perspective. The model was made up of data from the literature and a meta-analysis of RWE on the incidence of stroke/systemic embolism (SE), major bleeding (MB), intracranial haemorrhage (ICH) and all-cause mortality (ACM); direct costs included drug costs, costs for drug monitoring, and management of events from official national lists. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA) were used to assess the robustness of the results. RESULTS: Results from the meta-analysis showed that apixaban had a high probability of being the most effective for stroke/SE, MB and ACM. Despite their higher acquisition costs, the cost-effectiveness analysis showed all DOACs involved a saving when compared with VKAs, with per-patient savings ranging between €4647 (rivaroxaban) to €6086 (apixaban). Moreover, all DOACs indicated a gain both in quality-adjusted life-years and life-years. According to PSA, findings related to apixaban were consistent, while for dabigatran and rivaroxaban PSA revealed a higher degree of uncertainty. CONCLUSIONS: The beneficial effect of DOACs on containing events showed in RWE had the potential to offset drug-related costs, thus improving the sustainability of treatment for non-valvular AF in daily clinical practice. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40261-021-01002-z. Springer International Publishing 2021-02-15 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7946694/ /pubmed/33587284 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40261-021-01002-z Text en © The Author(s) 2021, corrected publication 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Lorenzoni, Valentina
Pirri, Salvatore
Turchetti, Giuseppe
Cost-Effectiveness of Direct Non-Vitamin K Oral Anticoagulants Versus Vitamin K Antagonists for the Management of Patients with Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation Based on Available “Real-World” Evidence: The Italian National Health System Perspective
title Cost-Effectiveness of Direct Non-Vitamin K Oral Anticoagulants Versus Vitamin K Antagonists for the Management of Patients with Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation Based on Available “Real-World” Evidence: The Italian National Health System Perspective
title_full Cost-Effectiveness of Direct Non-Vitamin K Oral Anticoagulants Versus Vitamin K Antagonists for the Management of Patients with Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation Based on Available “Real-World” Evidence: The Italian National Health System Perspective
title_fullStr Cost-Effectiveness of Direct Non-Vitamin K Oral Anticoagulants Versus Vitamin K Antagonists for the Management of Patients with Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation Based on Available “Real-World” Evidence: The Italian National Health System Perspective
title_full_unstemmed Cost-Effectiveness of Direct Non-Vitamin K Oral Anticoagulants Versus Vitamin K Antagonists for the Management of Patients with Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation Based on Available “Real-World” Evidence: The Italian National Health System Perspective
title_short Cost-Effectiveness of Direct Non-Vitamin K Oral Anticoagulants Versus Vitamin K Antagonists for the Management of Patients with Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation Based on Available “Real-World” Evidence: The Italian National Health System Perspective
title_sort cost-effectiveness of direct non-vitamin k oral anticoagulants versus vitamin k antagonists for the management of patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation based on available “real-world” evidence: the italian national health system perspective
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7946694/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33587284
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40261-021-01002-z
work_keys_str_mv AT lorenzonivalentina costeffectivenessofdirectnonvitaminkoralanticoagulantsversusvitaminkantagonistsforthemanagementofpatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillationbasedonavailablerealworldevidencetheitaliannationalhealthsystemperspective
AT pirrisalvatore costeffectivenessofdirectnonvitaminkoralanticoagulantsversusvitaminkantagonistsforthemanagementofpatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillationbasedonavailablerealworldevidencetheitaliannationalhealthsystemperspective
AT turchettigiuseppe costeffectivenessofdirectnonvitaminkoralanticoagulantsversusvitaminkantagonistsforthemanagementofpatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillationbasedonavailablerealworldevidencetheitaliannationalhealthsystemperspective