Cargando…

Factors to consider when interrogating 3D culture models with plate readers or automated microscopes

Along with the increased use of more physiologically relevant three-dimensional cell culture models comes the responsibility of researchers to validate new assay methods that measure events in structures that are physically larger and more complex compared to monolayers of cells. It should not be as...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Riss, Terry, Trask, O. Joseph
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7946695/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33564998
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11626-020-00537-3
_version_ 1783663104397148160
author Riss, Terry
Trask, O. Joseph
author_facet Riss, Terry
Trask, O. Joseph
author_sort Riss, Terry
collection PubMed
description Along with the increased use of more physiologically relevant three-dimensional cell culture models comes the responsibility of researchers to validate new assay methods that measure events in structures that are physically larger and more complex compared to monolayers of cells. It should not be assumed that assays designed using monolayers of cells will work for cells cultured as larger three-dimensional masses. The size and barriers for penetration of molecules through the layers of cells result in a different microenvironment for the cells in the outer layer compared to the center of three-dimensional structures. Diffusion rates for nutrients and oxygen may limit metabolic activity which is often measured as a marker for cell viability. For assays that lyse cells, the penetration of reagents to achieve uniform cell lysis must be considered. For live cell fluorescent imaging assays, the diffusion of fluorescent probes and penetration of photons of light for probe excitation and fluorescent emission must be considered. This review will provide an overview of factors to consider when implementing assays to interrogate three dimensional cell culture models.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7946695
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79466952021-03-28 Factors to consider when interrogating 3D culture models with plate readers or automated microscopes Riss, Terry Trask, O. Joseph In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim Invited Review Along with the increased use of more physiologically relevant three-dimensional cell culture models comes the responsibility of researchers to validate new assay methods that measure events in structures that are physically larger and more complex compared to monolayers of cells. It should not be assumed that assays designed using monolayers of cells will work for cells cultured as larger three-dimensional masses. The size and barriers for penetration of molecules through the layers of cells result in a different microenvironment for the cells in the outer layer compared to the center of three-dimensional structures. Diffusion rates for nutrients and oxygen may limit metabolic activity which is often measured as a marker for cell viability. For assays that lyse cells, the penetration of reagents to achieve uniform cell lysis must be considered. For live cell fluorescent imaging assays, the diffusion of fluorescent probes and penetration of photons of light for probe excitation and fluorescent emission must be considered. This review will provide an overview of factors to consider when implementing assays to interrogate three dimensional cell culture models. Springer US 2021-02-09 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7946695/ /pubmed/33564998 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11626-020-00537-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Invited Review
Riss, Terry
Trask, O. Joseph
Factors to consider when interrogating 3D culture models with plate readers or automated microscopes
title Factors to consider when interrogating 3D culture models with plate readers or automated microscopes
title_full Factors to consider when interrogating 3D culture models with plate readers or automated microscopes
title_fullStr Factors to consider when interrogating 3D culture models with plate readers or automated microscopes
title_full_unstemmed Factors to consider when interrogating 3D culture models with plate readers or automated microscopes
title_short Factors to consider when interrogating 3D culture models with plate readers or automated microscopes
title_sort factors to consider when interrogating 3d culture models with plate readers or automated microscopes
topic Invited Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7946695/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33564998
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11626-020-00537-3
work_keys_str_mv AT rissterry factorstoconsiderwheninterrogating3dculturemodelswithplatereadersorautomatedmicroscopes
AT traskojoseph factorstoconsiderwheninterrogating3dculturemodelswithplatereadersorautomatedmicroscopes