Cargando…
Physical therapy for the treatment of respiratory issues using Systemic Manual Therapy protocols
BACKGROUND: The emergence of the Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic increased the need for an effective treatment for respiratory conditions exponentially. To meet this challenge, we reevaluated the effectiveness of our physical therapy protocols for respiratory conditions. Protocols of interest were c...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7946828/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34391222 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbmt.2021.02.009 |
_version_ | 1783663112400928768 |
---|---|
author | Halili, Adi |
author_facet | Halili, Adi |
author_sort | Halili, Adi |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The emergence of the Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic increased the need for an effective treatment for respiratory conditions exponentially. To meet this challenge, we reevaluated the effectiveness of our physical therapy protocols for respiratory conditions. Protocols of interest were categorized as decongestive, neurogenic, mechanical, and immune modulating. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to evaluate which of our existing treatment protocols or protocol combinations produce the best outcome. To do so, we analyzed which ones can meet the following criteria when compared to all other treatments: test statistic (>2.0) in parametric and non-parametric tests, [statistical significance (p < 0.05)], effect size larger than 0.2, difference in the Patient Identified Problem Scale (PIP) score above Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID), and sample size minimum 15 treatments. DESIGN: Retrospective multivariate analysis using a modified adaptive platform design. METHODS: A computerized sampling using respiratory related key words from a blinded dataset yielded 178 patients with respiratory complaints or pain in the chest area. Additional statistical analysis using parametric and non-parametric tests evaluated the difference between each treatment protocol and the rest of the treatments provided. RESULTS: Several protocol combinations and one individual protocol passed the study criteria. Cardiac vascular venous thoracic (CVVT) protocol was used most frequently within these combinations (7), followed by Urinary Drainage (UD) (4). Other protocols in this group were Cardiac Cervical Cranial Vascular (CCCV), Venous Thoracic Cardiopulmonary (VTCP), and Diaphragm Cranial Sinus (DCS). Among the respiratory specific protocols, CVVT was significantly better than VTCP (0.40, p < 0.001). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: For the patient population studied, CVVT appears to be the primary protocol to consider, followed by UD, CCCV, VTCP, and DCS. Combining CVVT with Barral Abdominal Motility protocol (Barral) or VTCP with Lower Abdominal Urogenital (LAUG) on the same day might be required with acute patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7946828 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79468282021-03-11 Physical therapy for the treatment of respiratory issues using Systemic Manual Therapy protocols Halili, Adi J Bodyw Mov Ther Fascia Science and Clinical Applications BACKGROUND: The emergence of the Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic increased the need for an effective treatment for respiratory conditions exponentially. To meet this challenge, we reevaluated the effectiveness of our physical therapy protocols for respiratory conditions. Protocols of interest were categorized as decongestive, neurogenic, mechanical, and immune modulating. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to evaluate which of our existing treatment protocols or protocol combinations produce the best outcome. To do so, we analyzed which ones can meet the following criteria when compared to all other treatments: test statistic (>2.0) in parametric and non-parametric tests, [statistical significance (p < 0.05)], effect size larger than 0.2, difference in the Patient Identified Problem Scale (PIP) score above Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID), and sample size minimum 15 treatments. DESIGN: Retrospective multivariate analysis using a modified adaptive platform design. METHODS: A computerized sampling using respiratory related key words from a blinded dataset yielded 178 patients with respiratory complaints or pain in the chest area. Additional statistical analysis using parametric and non-parametric tests evaluated the difference between each treatment protocol and the rest of the treatments provided. RESULTS: Several protocol combinations and one individual protocol passed the study criteria. Cardiac vascular venous thoracic (CVVT) protocol was used most frequently within these combinations (7), followed by Urinary Drainage (UD) (4). Other protocols in this group were Cardiac Cervical Cranial Vascular (CCCV), Venous Thoracic Cardiopulmonary (VTCP), and Diaphragm Cranial Sinus (DCS). Among the respiratory specific protocols, CVVT was significantly better than VTCP (0.40, p < 0.001). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: For the patient population studied, CVVT appears to be the primary protocol to consider, followed by UD, CCCV, VTCP, and DCS. Combining CVVT with Barral Abdominal Motility protocol (Barral) or VTCP with Lower Abdominal Urogenital (LAUG) on the same day might be required with acute patients. The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2021-07 2021-03-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7946828/ /pubmed/34391222 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbmt.2021.02.009 Text en © 2021 The Author(s) Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Fascia Science and Clinical Applications Halili, Adi Physical therapy for the treatment of respiratory issues using Systemic Manual Therapy protocols |
title | Physical therapy for the treatment of respiratory issues using Systemic Manual Therapy protocols |
title_full | Physical therapy for the treatment of respiratory issues using Systemic Manual Therapy protocols |
title_fullStr | Physical therapy for the treatment of respiratory issues using Systemic Manual Therapy protocols |
title_full_unstemmed | Physical therapy for the treatment of respiratory issues using Systemic Manual Therapy protocols |
title_short | Physical therapy for the treatment of respiratory issues using Systemic Manual Therapy protocols |
title_sort | physical therapy for the treatment of respiratory issues using systemic manual therapy protocols |
topic | Fascia Science and Clinical Applications |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7946828/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34391222 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbmt.2021.02.009 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT haliliadi physicaltherapyforthetreatmentofrespiratoryissuesusingsystemicmanualtherapyprotocols |