Cargando…

Assessing the quality of mobile applications in chronic disease management: a scoping review

While there has been a rapid growth of digital health apps to support chronic diseases, clear standards on how to best evaluate the quality of these evolving tools are absent. This scoping review aims to synthesize the emerging field of mobile health app quality assessment by reviewing criteria used...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Agarwal, Payal, Gordon, Dara, Griffith, Janessa, Kithulegoda, Natasha, Witteman, Holly O., Sacha Bhatia, R., Kushniruk, Andre W., Borycki, Elizabeth M., Lamothe, Lise, Springall, Elena, Shaw, James
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7946941/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33692488
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41746-021-00410-x
_version_ 1783663138243084288
author Agarwal, Payal
Gordon, Dara
Griffith, Janessa
Kithulegoda, Natasha
Witteman, Holly O.
Sacha Bhatia, R.
Kushniruk, Andre W.
Borycki, Elizabeth M.
Lamothe, Lise
Springall, Elena
Shaw, James
author_facet Agarwal, Payal
Gordon, Dara
Griffith, Janessa
Kithulegoda, Natasha
Witteman, Holly O.
Sacha Bhatia, R.
Kushniruk, Andre W.
Borycki, Elizabeth M.
Lamothe, Lise
Springall, Elena
Shaw, James
author_sort Agarwal, Payal
collection PubMed
description While there has been a rapid growth of digital health apps to support chronic diseases, clear standards on how to best evaluate the quality of these evolving tools are absent. This scoping review aims to synthesize the emerging field of mobile health app quality assessment by reviewing criteria used by previous studies to assess the quality of mobile apps for chronic disease management. A literature review was conducted in September 2017 for published studies that use a set of quality criteria to directly evaluate two or more patient-facing apps supporting promote chronic disease management. This resulted in 8182 citations which were reviewed by research team members, resulting in 65 articles for inclusion. An inductive coding schema to synthesize the quality criteria utilized by included articles was developed, with 40 unique quality criteria identified. Of the 43 (66%) articles that reported resources used to support criteria selection, 19 (29%) used clinical guidelines, and 10 (15%) used behavior change theory. The most commonly used criteria included the presence of user engagement or behavior change functions (97%, n = 63) and technical features of the app such as customizability (20%, n = 13, while Usability was assessed by 24 studies (36.9%). This study highlights the significant variation in quality criteria employed for the assessment of mobile health apps. Future methods for app evaluation will benefit from approaches that leverage the best evidence regarding the clinical impact and behavior change mechanisms while more directly reflecting patient needs when evaluating the quality of apps.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7946941
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79469412021-03-28 Assessing the quality of mobile applications in chronic disease management: a scoping review Agarwal, Payal Gordon, Dara Griffith, Janessa Kithulegoda, Natasha Witteman, Holly O. Sacha Bhatia, R. Kushniruk, Andre W. Borycki, Elizabeth M. Lamothe, Lise Springall, Elena Shaw, James NPJ Digit Med Review Article While there has been a rapid growth of digital health apps to support chronic diseases, clear standards on how to best evaluate the quality of these evolving tools are absent. This scoping review aims to synthesize the emerging field of mobile health app quality assessment by reviewing criteria used by previous studies to assess the quality of mobile apps for chronic disease management. A literature review was conducted in September 2017 for published studies that use a set of quality criteria to directly evaluate two or more patient-facing apps supporting promote chronic disease management. This resulted in 8182 citations which were reviewed by research team members, resulting in 65 articles for inclusion. An inductive coding schema to synthesize the quality criteria utilized by included articles was developed, with 40 unique quality criteria identified. Of the 43 (66%) articles that reported resources used to support criteria selection, 19 (29%) used clinical guidelines, and 10 (15%) used behavior change theory. The most commonly used criteria included the presence of user engagement or behavior change functions (97%, n = 63) and technical features of the app such as customizability (20%, n = 13, while Usability was assessed by 24 studies (36.9%). This study highlights the significant variation in quality criteria employed for the assessment of mobile health apps. Future methods for app evaluation will benefit from approaches that leverage the best evidence regarding the clinical impact and behavior change mechanisms while more directly reflecting patient needs when evaluating the quality of apps. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-03-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7946941/ /pubmed/33692488 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41746-021-00410-x Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Review Article
Agarwal, Payal
Gordon, Dara
Griffith, Janessa
Kithulegoda, Natasha
Witteman, Holly O.
Sacha Bhatia, R.
Kushniruk, Andre W.
Borycki, Elizabeth M.
Lamothe, Lise
Springall, Elena
Shaw, James
Assessing the quality of mobile applications in chronic disease management: a scoping review
title Assessing the quality of mobile applications in chronic disease management: a scoping review
title_full Assessing the quality of mobile applications in chronic disease management: a scoping review
title_fullStr Assessing the quality of mobile applications in chronic disease management: a scoping review
title_full_unstemmed Assessing the quality of mobile applications in chronic disease management: a scoping review
title_short Assessing the quality of mobile applications in chronic disease management: a scoping review
title_sort assessing the quality of mobile applications in chronic disease management: a scoping review
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7946941/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33692488
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41746-021-00410-x
work_keys_str_mv AT agarwalpayal assessingthequalityofmobileapplicationsinchronicdiseasemanagementascopingreview
AT gordondara assessingthequalityofmobileapplicationsinchronicdiseasemanagementascopingreview
AT griffithjanessa assessingthequalityofmobileapplicationsinchronicdiseasemanagementascopingreview
AT kithulegodanatasha assessingthequalityofmobileapplicationsinchronicdiseasemanagementascopingreview
AT wittemanhollyo assessingthequalityofmobileapplicationsinchronicdiseasemanagementascopingreview
AT sachabhatiar assessingthequalityofmobileapplicationsinchronicdiseasemanagementascopingreview
AT kushnirukandrew assessingthequalityofmobileapplicationsinchronicdiseasemanagementascopingreview
AT boryckielizabethm assessingthequalityofmobileapplicationsinchronicdiseasemanagementascopingreview
AT lamothelise assessingthequalityofmobileapplicationsinchronicdiseasemanagementascopingreview
AT springallelena assessingthequalityofmobileapplicationsinchronicdiseasemanagementascopingreview
AT shawjames assessingthequalityofmobileapplicationsinchronicdiseasemanagementascopingreview