Cargando…
Assessing the quality of mobile applications in chronic disease management: a scoping review
While there has been a rapid growth of digital health apps to support chronic diseases, clear standards on how to best evaluate the quality of these evolving tools are absent. This scoping review aims to synthesize the emerging field of mobile health app quality assessment by reviewing criteria used...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7946941/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33692488 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41746-021-00410-x |
_version_ | 1783663138243084288 |
---|---|
author | Agarwal, Payal Gordon, Dara Griffith, Janessa Kithulegoda, Natasha Witteman, Holly O. Sacha Bhatia, R. Kushniruk, Andre W. Borycki, Elizabeth M. Lamothe, Lise Springall, Elena Shaw, James |
author_facet | Agarwal, Payal Gordon, Dara Griffith, Janessa Kithulegoda, Natasha Witteman, Holly O. Sacha Bhatia, R. Kushniruk, Andre W. Borycki, Elizabeth M. Lamothe, Lise Springall, Elena Shaw, James |
author_sort | Agarwal, Payal |
collection | PubMed |
description | While there has been a rapid growth of digital health apps to support chronic diseases, clear standards on how to best evaluate the quality of these evolving tools are absent. This scoping review aims to synthesize the emerging field of mobile health app quality assessment by reviewing criteria used by previous studies to assess the quality of mobile apps for chronic disease management. A literature review was conducted in September 2017 for published studies that use a set of quality criteria to directly evaluate two or more patient-facing apps supporting promote chronic disease management. This resulted in 8182 citations which were reviewed by research team members, resulting in 65 articles for inclusion. An inductive coding schema to synthesize the quality criteria utilized by included articles was developed, with 40 unique quality criteria identified. Of the 43 (66%) articles that reported resources used to support criteria selection, 19 (29%) used clinical guidelines, and 10 (15%) used behavior change theory. The most commonly used criteria included the presence of user engagement or behavior change functions (97%, n = 63) and technical features of the app such as customizability (20%, n = 13, while Usability was assessed by 24 studies (36.9%). This study highlights the significant variation in quality criteria employed for the assessment of mobile health apps. Future methods for app evaluation will benefit from approaches that leverage the best evidence regarding the clinical impact and behavior change mechanisms while more directly reflecting patient needs when evaluating the quality of apps. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7946941 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79469412021-03-28 Assessing the quality of mobile applications in chronic disease management: a scoping review Agarwal, Payal Gordon, Dara Griffith, Janessa Kithulegoda, Natasha Witteman, Holly O. Sacha Bhatia, R. Kushniruk, Andre W. Borycki, Elizabeth M. Lamothe, Lise Springall, Elena Shaw, James NPJ Digit Med Review Article While there has been a rapid growth of digital health apps to support chronic diseases, clear standards on how to best evaluate the quality of these evolving tools are absent. This scoping review aims to synthesize the emerging field of mobile health app quality assessment by reviewing criteria used by previous studies to assess the quality of mobile apps for chronic disease management. A literature review was conducted in September 2017 for published studies that use a set of quality criteria to directly evaluate two or more patient-facing apps supporting promote chronic disease management. This resulted in 8182 citations which were reviewed by research team members, resulting in 65 articles for inclusion. An inductive coding schema to synthesize the quality criteria utilized by included articles was developed, with 40 unique quality criteria identified. Of the 43 (66%) articles that reported resources used to support criteria selection, 19 (29%) used clinical guidelines, and 10 (15%) used behavior change theory. The most commonly used criteria included the presence of user engagement or behavior change functions (97%, n = 63) and technical features of the app such as customizability (20%, n = 13, while Usability was assessed by 24 studies (36.9%). This study highlights the significant variation in quality criteria employed for the assessment of mobile health apps. Future methods for app evaluation will benefit from approaches that leverage the best evidence regarding the clinical impact and behavior change mechanisms while more directly reflecting patient needs when evaluating the quality of apps. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-03-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7946941/ /pubmed/33692488 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41746-021-00410-x Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Agarwal, Payal Gordon, Dara Griffith, Janessa Kithulegoda, Natasha Witteman, Holly O. Sacha Bhatia, R. Kushniruk, Andre W. Borycki, Elizabeth M. Lamothe, Lise Springall, Elena Shaw, James Assessing the quality of mobile applications in chronic disease management: a scoping review |
title | Assessing the quality of mobile applications in chronic disease management: a scoping review |
title_full | Assessing the quality of mobile applications in chronic disease management: a scoping review |
title_fullStr | Assessing the quality of mobile applications in chronic disease management: a scoping review |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessing the quality of mobile applications in chronic disease management: a scoping review |
title_short | Assessing the quality of mobile applications in chronic disease management: a scoping review |
title_sort | assessing the quality of mobile applications in chronic disease management: a scoping review |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7946941/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33692488 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41746-021-00410-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT agarwalpayal assessingthequalityofmobileapplicationsinchronicdiseasemanagementascopingreview AT gordondara assessingthequalityofmobileapplicationsinchronicdiseasemanagementascopingreview AT griffithjanessa assessingthequalityofmobileapplicationsinchronicdiseasemanagementascopingreview AT kithulegodanatasha assessingthequalityofmobileapplicationsinchronicdiseasemanagementascopingreview AT wittemanhollyo assessingthequalityofmobileapplicationsinchronicdiseasemanagementascopingreview AT sachabhatiar assessingthequalityofmobileapplicationsinchronicdiseasemanagementascopingreview AT kushnirukandrew assessingthequalityofmobileapplicationsinchronicdiseasemanagementascopingreview AT boryckielizabethm assessingthequalityofmobileapplicationsinchronicdiseasemanagementascopingreview AT lamothelise assessingthequalityofmobileapplicationsinchronicdiseasemanagementascopingreview AT springallelena assessingthequalityofmobileapplicationsinchronicdiseasemanagementascopingreview AT shawjames assessingthequalityofmobileapplicationsinchronicdiseasemanagementascopingreview |