Cargando…

Effectiveness and Safety of Insulin Glulisine When Initiating Supplementary Prandial Insulin Treatment (SIT) in Insulin-Naïve Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: The Observational IGLU-SIT Study

INTRODUCTION: The IGLU-SIT study documented the effectiveness of initiating supplementary prandial insulin treatment (SIT) with insulin glulisine after failure of oral antidiabetic drugs alone in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) in a real-world setting in Germany. METHODS: The IGLU-SIT study was...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pfohl, Martin, Seufert, Jochen, Borck, Anja, Bramlage, Peter, Siegmund, Thorsten
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7947113/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33544355
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-021-00998-z
_version_ 1783663161915736064
author Pfohl, Martin
Seufert, Jochen
Borck, Anja
Bramlage, Peter
Siegmund, Thorsten
author_facet Pfohl, Martin
Seufert, Jochen
Borck, Anja
Bramlage, Peter
Siegmund, Thorsten
author_sort Pfohl, Martin
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The IGLU-SIT study documented the effectiveness of initiating supplementary prandial insulin treatment (SIT) with insulin glulisine after failure of oral antidiabetic drugs alone in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) in a real-world setting in Germany. METHODS: The IGLU-SIT study was an open-label, prospective, multicentre, non-interventional study with an observation period of 12 ± 1 months. The primary objective was to determine the proportion of patients reaching their pre-defined glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) goal at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months. Selected secondary objectives were absolute change in HbA1c, a 7-point blood glucose profile, and rate of hypoglycaemia. Data were evaluated overall and by age group (< 65, 65–74 and ≥ 75 years). RESULTS: Overall, 215 patients with T2DM were observed in 64 centres. Baseline HbA1c was 8.3%, and mean HbA1c target was 6.8% (baseline 8.1% and target 6.9% in patients ≥ 75 years). Individual HbA1c target attainment in patients peaked at 38.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] 32.1–46.1%) after 12 months; this was 45.9% in patients aged ≥ 75 years. The mean HbA1c reduction was 1.12 ± 1.05% (p < 0.0001) with only minor differences by age group. A 7-point blood glucose profile revealed significant reductions (p < 0.0001) at all time-points. The rate of confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemia was 2.2% (95% CI 0.7–5.1) during the 12-month follow-up; rates were increased in patients aged ≥ 75 years (7.0%; 95% CI 1.5–19.1) as were the rates of adverse events (17.8 vs. 6.1%). CONCLUSION: Initiating SIT with insulin glulisine is an appropriate treatment option in patients whose T2DM is insufficiently controlled. Particular attention should be paid to elderly patients in whom higher attainment rates of treatment target were associated with adverse events. TRIAL REGISTRATION: https://awbdb.bfarm.de; Identifier: 6819; Date of registration: 23.06.2016
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7947113
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79471132021-03-28 Effectiveness and Safety of Insulin Glulisine When Initiating Supplementary Prandial Insulin Treatment (SIT) in Insulin-Naïve Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: The Observational IGLU-SIT Study Pfohl, Martin Seufert, Jochen Borck, Anja Bramlage, Peter Siegmund, Thorsten Diabetes Ther Original Research INTRODUCTION: The IGLU-SIT study documented the effectiveness of initiating supplementary prandial insulin treatment (SIT) with insulin glulisine after failure of oral antidiabetic drugs alone in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) in a real-world setting in Germany. METHODS: The IGLU-SIT study was an open-label, prospective, multicentre, non-interventional study with an observation period of 12 ± 1 months. The primary objective was to determine the proportion of patients reaching their pre-defined glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) goal at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months. Selected secondary objectives were absolute change in HbA1c, a 7-point blood glucose profile, and rate of hypoglycaemia. Data were evaluated overall and by age group (< 65, 65–74 and ≥ 75 years). RESULTS: Overall, 215 patients with T2DM were observed in 64 centres. Baseline HbA1c was 8.3%, and mean HbA1c target was 6.8% (baseline 8.1% and target 6.9% in patients ≥ 75 years). Individual HbA1c target attainment in patients peaked at 38.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] 32.1–46.1%) after 12 months; this was 45.9% in patients aged ≥ 75 years. The mean HbA1c reduction was 1.12 ± 1.05% (p < 0.0001) with only minor differences by age group. A 7-point blood glucose profile revealed significant reductions (p < 0.0001) at all time-points. The rate of confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemia was 2.2% (95% CI 0.7–5.1) during the 12-month follow-up; rates were increased in patients aged ≥ 75 years (7.0%; 95% CI 1.5–19.1) as were the rates of adverse events (17.8 vs. 6.1%). CONCLUSION: Initiating SIT with insulin glulisine is an appropriate treatment option in patients whose T2DM is insufficiently controlled. Particular attention should be paid to elderly patients in whom higher attainment rates of treatment target were associated with adverse events. TRIAL REGISTRATION: https://awbdb.bfarm.de; Identifier: 6819; Date of registration: 23.06.2016 Springer Healthcare 2021-02-05 2021-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7947113/ /pubmed/33544355 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-021-00998-z Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Research
Pfohl, Martin
Seufert, Jochen
Borck, Anja
Bramlage, Peter
Siegmund, Thorsten
Effectiveness and Safety of Insulin Glulisine When Initiating Supplementary Prandial Insulin Treatment (SIT) in Insulin-Naïve Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: The Observational IGLU-SIT Study
title Effectiveness and Safety of Insulin Glulisine When Initiating Supplementary Prandial Insulin Treatment (SIT) in Insulin-Naïve Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: The Observational IGLU-SIT Study
title_full Effectiveness and Safety of Insulin Glulisine When Initiating Supplementary Prandial Insulin Treatment (SIT) in Insulin-Naïve Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: The Observational IGLU-SIT Study
title_fullStr Effectiveness and Safety of Insulin Glulisine When Initiating Supplementary Prandial Insulin Treatment (SIT) in Insulin-Naïve Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: The Observational IGLU-SIT Study
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness and Safety of Insulin Glulisine When Initiating Supplementary Prandial Insulin Treatment (SIT) in Insulin-Naïve Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: The Observational IGLU-SIT Study
title_short Effectiveness and Safety of Insulin Glulisine When Initiating Supplementary Prandial Insulin Treatment (SIT) in Insulin-Naïve Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: The Observational IGLU-SIT Study
title_sort effectiveness and safety of insulin glulisine when initiating supplementary prandial insulin treatment (sit) in insulin-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes: the observational iglu-sit study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7947113/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33544355
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-021-00998-z
work_keys_str_mv AT pfohlmartin effectivenessandsafetyofinsulinglulisinewheninitiatingsupplementaryprandialinsulintreatmentsitininsulinnaivepatientswithtype2diabetestheobservationaliglusitstudy
AT seufertjochen effectivenessandsafetyofinsulinglulisinewheninitiatingsupplementaryprandialinsulintreatmentsitininsulinnaivepatientswithtype2diabetestheobservationaliglusitstudy
AT borckanja effectivenessandsafetyofinsulinglulisinewheninitiatingsupplementaryprandialinsulintreatmentsitininsulinnaivepatientswithtype2diabetestheobservationaliglusitstudy
AT bramlagepeter effectivenessandsafetyofinsulinglulisinewheninitiatingsupplementaryprandialinsulintreatmentsitininsulinnaivepatientswithtype2diabetestheobservationaliglusitstudy
AT siegmundthorsten effectivenessandsafetyofinsulinglulisinewheninitiatingsupplementaryprandialinsulintreatmentsitininsulinnaivepatientswithtype2diabetestheobservationaliglusitstudy