Cargando…
Implementation of low-dose CT screening in two different health care systems: Mount Sinai Healthcare System and Phoenix VA Health Care System
Implementation of lung screening (LS) programs is challenging even among health care organizations that have the motivation, the resources, and more importantly, the goal of providing for life-saving early detection, diagnosis, and treatment of lung cancer. We provide a case study of LS implementati...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AME Publishing Company
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7947390/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33718045 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tlcr-20-761 |
_version_ | 1783663215763259392 |
---|---|
author | Henschke, Claudia I. Yankelevitz, David F. Jirapatnakul, Artit Yip, Rowena Reccoppa, Vivian Benjamin, Charlene Llamo, Tserling Williams, Angel Liu, Simon Max, Daniel Aguayo, Samuel M. Morales, Providencia Igel, Brian J. Abbaszadegan, Hamed Fredricks, Peter A. Garcia, Daniel P. Permana, Paska A. Fawcett, Janet Sultan, Samir Murphy, Lorenza A. |
author_facet | Henschke, Claudia I. Yankelevitz, David F. Jirapatnakul, Artit Yip, Rowena Reccoppa, Vivian Benjamin, Charlene Llamo, Tserling Williams, Angel Liu, Simon Max, Daniel Aguayo, Samuel M. Morales, Providencia Igel, Brian J. Abbaszadegan, Hamed Fredricks, Peter A. Garcia, Daniel P. Permana, Paska A. Fawcett, Janet Sultan, Samir Murphy, Lorenza A. |
author_sort | Henschke, Claudia I. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Implementation of lung screening (LS) programs is challenging even among health care organizations that have the motivation, the resources, and more importantly, the goal of providing for life-saving early detection, diagnosis, and treatment of lung cancer. We provide a case study of LS implementation in different healthcare systems, at the Mount Sinai Healthcare System (MSHS) in New York City, and at the Phoenix Veterans Affairs Health Care System (PVAHCS) in Phoenix, Arizona. This will illustrate the commonalities and differences of the LS implementation process in two very different health care systems in very different parts of the United States. Underlying the successful implementation of these LS programs was the use of a comprehensive management system, the Early Lung Cancer Action Program (ELCAP) Management System(TM). The collaboration between MSHS and PVAHCS over the past decade led to the ELCAP Management System(TM) being gifted by the Early Diagnosis and Treatment Research Foundation to the PVAHCS, to develop a “VA-ELCAP” version. While there remain challenges and opportunities to continue improving LS and its implementation, there is an increasing realization that most patients who are diagnosed with lung cancer as a result of annual LS can be cured, and that of all the possible risks associated with LS, the greater risk of all is for heavy cigarette smokers not to be screened. We identified 10 critical components in implementing a LS program. We provided the details of each of these components for the two healthcare systems. Most importantly, is that continual re-evaluation of the screening program is needed based on the ongoing quality assurance program and database of the actual screenings. At minimum, there should be an annual review and updating. As early diagnosis of lung cancer must be followed by optimal treatment to be effective, treatment advances for small, early lung cancers diagnosed as a result of screening also need to be assessed and incorporated into the entire screening and treatment program. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7947390 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | AME Publishing Company |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79473902021-03-12 Implementation of low-dose CT screening in two different health care systems: Mount Sinai Healthcare System and Phoenix VA Health Care System Henschke, Claudia I. Yankelevitz, David F. Jirapatnakul, Artit Yip, Rowena Reccoppa, Vivian Benjamin, Charlene Llamo, Tserling Williams, Angel Liu, Simon Max, Daniel Aguayo, Samuel M. Morales, Providencia Igel, Brian J. Abbaszadegan, Hamed Fredricks, Peter A. Garcia, Daniel P. Permana, Paska A. Fawcett, Janet Sultan, Samir Murphy, Lorenza A. Transl Lung Cancer Res Review Article on Implementation of CT-based Screening of Lung Cancer Implementation of lung screening (LS) programs is challenging even among health care organizations that have the motivation, the resources, and more importantly, the goal of providing for life-saving early detection, diagnosis, and treatment of lung cancer. We provide a case study of LS implementation in different healthcare systems, at the Mount Sinai Healthcare System (MSHS) in New York City, and at the Phoenix Veterans Affairs Health Care System (PVAHCS) in Phoenix, Arizona. This will illustrate the commonalities and differences of the LS implementation process in two very different health care systems in very different parts of the United States. Underlying the successful implementation of these LS programs was the use of a comprehensive management system, the Early Lung Cancer Action Program (ELCAP) Management System(TM). The collaboration between MSHS and PVAHCS over the past decade led to the ELCAP Management System(TM) being gifted by the Early Diagnosis and Treatment Research Foundation to the PVAHCS, to develop a “VA-ELCAP” version. While there remain challenges and opportunities to continue improving LS and its implementation, there is an increasing realization that most patients who are diagnosed with lung cancer as a result of annual LS can be cured, and that of all the possible risks associated with LS, the greater risk of all is for heavy cigarette smokers not to be screened. We identified 10 critical components in implementing a LS program. We provided the details of each of these components for the two healthcare systems. Most importantly, is that continual re-evaluation of the screening program is needed based on the ongoing quality assurance program and database of the actual screenings. At minimum, there should be an annual review and updating. As early diagnosis of lung cancer must be followed by optimal treatment to be effective, treatment advances for small, early lung cancers diagnosed as a result of screening also need to be assessed and incorporated into the entire screening and treatment program. AME Publishing Company 2021-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7947390/ /pubmed/33718045 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tlcr-20-761 Text en 2021 Translational Lung Cancer Research. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Review Article on Implementation of CT-based Screening of Lung Cancer Henschke, Claudia I. Yankelevitz, David F. Jirapatnakul, Artit Yip, Rowena Reccoppa, Vivian Benjamin, Charlene Llamo, Tserling Williams, Angel Liu, Simon Max, Daniel Aguayo, Samuel M. Morales, Providencia Igel, Brian J. Abbaszadegan, Hamed Fredricks, Peter A. Garcia, Daniel P. Permana, Paska A. Fawcett, Janet Sultan, Samir Murphy, Lorenza A. Implementation of low-dose CT screening in two different health care systems: Mount Sinai Healthcare System and Phoenix VA Health Care System |
title | Implementation of low-dose CT screening in two different health care systems: Mount Sinai Healthcare System and Phoenix VA Health Care System |
title_full | Implementation of low-dose CT screening in two different health care systems: Mount Sinai Healthcare System and Phoenix VA Health Care System |
title_fullStr | Implementation of low-dose CT screening in two different health care systems: Mount Sinai Healthcare System and Phoenix VA Health Care System |
title_full_unstemmed | Implementation of low-dose CT screening in two different health care systems: Mount Sinai Healthcare System and Phoenix VA Health Care System |
title_short | Implementation of low-dose CT screening in two different health care systems: Mount Sinai Healthcare System and Phoenix VA Health Care System |
title_sort | implementation of low-dose ct screening in two different health care systems: mount sinai healthcare system and phoenix va health care system |
topic | Review Article on Implementation of CT-based Screening of Lung Cancer |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7947390/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33718045 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tlcr-20-761 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT henschkeclaudiai implementationoflowdosectscreeningintwodifferenthealthcaresystemsmountsinaihealthcaresystemandphoenixvahealthcaresystem AT yankelevitzdavidf implementationoflowdosectscreeningintwodifferenthealthcaresystemsmountsinaihealthcaresystemandphoenixvahealthcaresystem AT jirapatnakulartit implementationoflowdosectscreeningintwodifferenthealthcaresystemsmountsinaihealthcaresystemandphoenixvahealthcaresystem AT yiprowena implementationoflowdosectscreeningintwodifferenthealthcaresystemsmountsinaihealthcaresystemandphoenixvahealthcaresystem AT reccoppavivian implementationoflowdosectscreeningintwodifferenthealthcaresystemsmountsinaihealthcaresystemandphoenixvahealthcaresystem AT benjamincharlene implementationoflowdosectscreeningintwodifferenthealthcaresystemsmountsinaihealthcaresystemandphoenixvahealthcaresystem AT llamotserling implementationoflowdosectscreeningintwodifferenthealthcaresystemsmountsinaihealthcaresystemandphoenixvahealthcaresystem AT williamsangel implementationoflowdosectscreeningintwodifferenthealthcaresystemsmountsinaihealthcaresystemandphoenixvahealthcaresystem AT liusimon implementationoflowdosectscreeningintwodifferenthealthcaresystemsmountsinaihealthcaresystemandphoenixvahealthcaresystem AT maxdaniel implementationoflowdosectscreeningintwodifferenthealthcaresystemsmountsinaihealthcaresystemandphoenixvahealthcaresystem AT aguayosamuelm implementationoflowdosectscreeningintwodifferenthealthcaresystemsmountsinaihealthcaresystemandphoenixvahealthcaresystem AT moralesprovidencia implementationoflowdosectscreeningintwodifferenthealthcaresystemsmountsinaihealthcaresystemandphoenixvahealthcaresystem AT igelbrianj implementationoflowdosectscreeningintwodifferenthealthcaresystemsmountsinaihealthcaresystemandphoenixvahealthcaresystem AT abbaszadeganhamed implementationoflowdosectscreeningintwodifferenthealthcaresystemsmountsinaihealthcaresystemandphoenixvahealthcaresystem AT fredrickspetera implementationoflowdosectscreeningintwodifferenthealthcaresystemsmountsinaihealthcaresystemandphoenixvahealthcaresystem AT garciadanielp implementationoflowdosectscreeningintwodifferenthealthcaresystemsmountsinaihealthcaresystemandphoenixvahealthcaresystem AT permanapaskaa implementationoflowdosectscreeningintwodifferenthealthcaresystemsmountsinaihealthcaresystemandphoenixvahealthcaresystem AT fawcettjanet implementationoflowdosectscreeningintwodifferenthealthcaresystemsmountsinaihealthcaresystemandphoenixvahealthcaresystem AT sultansamir implementationoflowdosectscreeningintwodifferenthealthcaresystemsmountsinaihealthcaresystemandphoenixvahealthcaresystem AT murphylorenzaa implementationoflowdosectscreeningintwodifferenthealthcaresystemsmountsinaihealthcaresystemandphoenixvahealthcaresystem |