Cargando…

Implementation of low-dose CT screening in two different health care systems: Mount Sinai Healthcare System and Phoenix VA Health Care System

Implementation of lung screening (LS) programs is challenging even among health care organizations that have the motivation, the resources, and more importantly, the goal of providing for life-saving early detection, diagnosis, and treatment of lung cancer. We provide a case study of LS implementati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Henschke, Claudia I., Yankelevitz, David F., Jirapatnakul, Artit, Yip, Rowena, Reccoppa, Vivian, Benjamin, Charlene, Llamo, Tserling, Williams, Angel, Liu, Simon, Max, Daniel, Aguayo, Samuel M., Morales, Providencia, Igel, Brian J., Abbaszadegan, Hamed, Fredricks, Peter A., Garcia, Daniel P., Permana, Paska A., Fawcett, Janet, Sultan, Samir, Murphy, Lorenza A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7947390/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33718045
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tlcr-20-761
_version_ 1783663215763259392
author Henschke, Claudia I.
Yankelevitz, David F.
Jirapatnakul, Artit
Yip, Rowena
Reccoppa, Vivian
Benjamin, Charlene
Llamo, Tserling
Williams, Angel
Liu, Simon
Max, Daniel
Aguayo, Samuel M.
Morales, Providencia
Igel, Brian J.
Abbaszadegan, Hamed
Fredricks, Peter A.
Garcia, Daniel P.
Permana, Paska A.
Fawcett, Janet
Sultan, Samir
Murphy, Lorenza A.
author_facet Henschke, Claudia I.
Yankelevitz, David F.
Jirapatnakul, Artit
Yip, Rowena
Reccoppa, Vivian
Benjamin, Charlene
Llamo, Tserling
Williams, Angel
Liu, Simon
Max, Daniel
Aguayo, Samuel M.
Morales, Providencia
Igel, Brian J.
Abbaszadegan, Hamed
Fredricks, Peter A.
Garcia, Daniel P.
Permana, Paska A.
Fawcett, Janet
Sultan, Samir
Murphy, Lorenza A.
author_sort Henschke, Claudia I.
collection PubMed
description Implementation of lung screening (LS) programs is challenging even among health care organizations that have the motivation, the resources, and more importantly, the goal of providing for life-saving early detection, diagnosis, and treatment of lung cancer. We provide a case study of LS implementation in different healthcare systems, at the Mount Sinai Healthcare System (MSHS) in New York City, and at the Phoenix Veterans Affairs Health Care System (PVAHCS) in Phoenix, Arizona. This will illustrate the commonalities and differences of the LS implementation process in two very different health care systems in very different parts of the United States. Underlying the successful implementation of these LS programs was the use of a comprehensive management system, the Early Lung Cancer Action Program (ELCAP) Management System(TM). The collaboration between MSHS and PVAHCS over the past decade led to the ELCAP Management System(TM) being gifted by the Early Diagnosis and Treatment Research Foundation to the PVAHCS, to develop a “VA-ELCAP” version. While there remain challenges and opportunities to continue improving LS and its implementation, there is an increasing realization that most patients who are diagnosed with lung cancer as a result of annual LS can be cured, and that of all the possible risks associated with LS, the greater risk of all is for heavy cigarette smokers not to be screened. We identified 10 critical components in implementing a LS program. We provided the details of each of these components for the two healthcare systems. Most importantly, is that continual re-evaluation of the screening program is needed based on the ongoing quality assurance program and database of the actual screenings. At minimum, there should be an annual review and updating. As early diagnosis of lung cancer must be followed by optimal treatment to be effective, treatment advances for small, early lung cancers diagnosed as a result of screening also need to be assessed and incorporated into the entire screening and treatment program.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7947390
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79473902021-03-12 Implementation of low-dose CT screening in two different health care systems: Mount Sinai Healthcare System and Phoenix VA Health Care System Henschke, Claudia I. Yankelevitz, David F. Jirapatnakul, Artit Yip, Rowena Reccoppa, Vivian Benjamin, Charlene Llamo, Tserling Williams, Angel Liu, Simon Max, Daniel Aguayo, Samuel M. Morales, Providencia Igel, Brian J. Abbaszadegan, Hamed Fredricks, Peter A. Garcia, Daniel P. Permana, Paska A. Fawcett, Janet Sultan, Samir Murphy, Lorenza A. Transl Lung Cancer Res Review Article on Implementation of CT-based Screening of Lung Cancer Implementation of lung screening (LS) programs is challenging even among health care organizations that have the motivation, the resources, and more importantly, the goal of providing for life-saving early detection, diagnosis, and treatment of lung cancer. We provide a case study of LS implementation in different healthcare systems, at the Mount Sinai Healthcare System (MSHS) in New York City, and at the Phoenix Veterans Affairs Health Care System (PVAHCS) in Phoenix, Arizona. This will illustrate the commonalities and differences of the LS implementation process in two very different health care systems in very different parts of the United States. Underlying the successful implementation of these LS programs was the use of a comprehensive management system, the Early Lung Cancer Action Program (ELCAP) Management System(TM). The collaboration between MSHS and PVAHCS over the past decade led to the ELCAP Management System(TM) being gifted by the Early Diagnosis and Treatment Research Foundation to the PVAHCS, to develop a “VA-ELCAP” version. While there remain challenges and opportunities to continue improving LS and its implementation, there is an increasing realization that most patients who are diagnosed with lung cancer as a result of annual LS can be cured, and that of all the possible risks associated with LS, the greater risk of all is for heavy cigarette smokers not to be screened. We identified 10 critical components in implementing a LS program. We provided the details of each of these components for the two healthcare systems. Most importantly, is that continual re-evaluation of the screening program is needed based on the ongoing quality assurance program and database of the actual screenings. At minimum, there should be an annual review and updating. As early diagnosis of lung cancer must be followed by optimal treatment to be effective, treatment advances for small, early lung cancers diagnosed as a result of screening also need to be assessed and incorporated into the entire screening and treatment program. AME Publishing Company 2021-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7947390/ /pubmed/33718045 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tlcr-20-761 Text en 2021 Translational Lung Cancer Research. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Review Article on Implementation of CT-based Screening of Lung Cancer
Henschke, Claudia I.
Yankelevitz, David F.
Jirapatnakul, Artit
Yip, Rowena
Reccoppa, Vivian
Benjamin, Charlene
Llamo, Tserling
Williams, Angel
Liu, Simon
Max, Daniel
Aguayo, Samuel M.
Morales, Providencia
Igel, Brian J.
Abbaszadegan, Hamed
Fredricks, Peter A.
Garcia, Daniel P.
Permana, Paska A.
Fawcett, Janet
Sultan, Samir
Murphy, Lorenza A.
Implementation of low-dose CT screening in two different health care systems: Mount Sinai Healthcare System and Phoenix VA Health Care System
title Implementation of low-dose CT screening in two different health care systems: Mount Sinai Healthcare System and Phoenix VA Health Care System
title_full Implementation of low-dose CT screening in two different health care systems: Mount Sinai Healthcare System and Phoenix VA Health Care System
title_fullStr Implementation of low-dose CT screening in two different health care systems: Mount Sinai Healthcare System and Phoenix VA Health Care System
title_full_unstemmed Implementation of low-dose CT screening in two different health care systems: Mount Sinai Healthcare System and Phoenix VA Health Care System
title_short Implementation of low-dose CT screening in two different health care systems: Mount Sinai Healthcare System and Phoenix VA Health Care System
title_sort implementation of low-dose ct screening in two different health care systems: mount sinai healthcare system and phoenix va health care system
topic Review Article on Implementation of CT-based Screening of Lung Cancer
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7947390/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33718045
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tlcr-20-761
work_keys_str_mv AT henschkeclaudiai implementationoflowdosectscreeningintwodifferenthealthcaresystemsmountsinaihealthcaresystemandphoenixvahealthcaresystem
AT yankelevitzdavidf implementationoflowdosectscreeningintwodifferenthealthcaresystemsmountsinaihealthcaresystemandphoenixvahealthcaresystem
AT jirapatnakulartit implementationoflowdosectscreeningintwodifferenthealthcaresystemsmountsinaihealthcaresystemandphoenixvahealthcaresystem
AT yiprowena implementationoflowdosectscreeningintwodifferenthealthcaresystemsmountsinaihealthcaresystemandphoenixvahealthcaresystem
AT reccoppavivian implementationoflowdosectscreeningintwodifferenthealthcaresystemsmountsinaihealthcaresystemandphoenixvahealthcaresystem
AT benjamincharlene implementationoflowdosectscreeningintwodifferenthealthcaresystemsmountsinaihealthcaresystemandphoenixvahealthcaresystem
AT llamotserling implementationoflowdosectscreeningintwodifferenthealthcaresystemsmountsinaihealthcaresystemandphoenixvahealthcaresystem
AT williamsangel implementationoflowdosectscreeningintwodifferenthealthcaresystemsmountsinaihealthcaresystemandphoenixvahealthcaresystem
AT liusimon implementationoflowdosectscreeningintwodifferenthealthcaresystemsmountsinaihealthcaresystemandphoenixvahealthcaresystem
AT maxdaniel implementationoflowdosectscreeningintwodifferenthealthcaresystemsmountsinaihealthcaresystemandphoenixvahealthcaresystem
AT aguayosamuelm implementationoflowdosectscreeningintwodifferenthealthcaresystemsmountsinaihealthcaresystemandphoenixvahealthcaresystem
AT moralesprovidencia implementationoflowdosectscreeningintwodifferenthealthcaresystemsmountsinaihealthcaresystemandphoenixvahealthcaresystem
AT igelbrianj implementationoflowdosectscreeningintwodifferenthealthcaresystemsmountsinaihealthcaresystemandphoenixvahealthcaresystem
AT abbaszadeganhamed implementationoflowdosectscreeningintwodifferenthealthcaresystemsmountsinaihealthcaresystemandphoenixvahealthcaresystem
AT fredrickspetera implementationoflowdosectscreeningintwodifferenthealthcaresystemsmountsinaihealthcaresystemandphoenixvahealthcaresystem
AT garciadanielp implementationoflowdosectscreeningintwodifferenthealthcaresystemsmountsinaihealthcaresystemandphoenixvahealthcaresystem
AT permanapaskaa implementationoflowdosectscreeningintwodifferenthealthcaresystemsmountsinaihealthcaresystemandphoenixvahealthcaresystem
AT fawcettjanet implementationoflowdosectscreeningintwodifferenthealthcaresystemsmountsinaihealthcaresystemandphoenixvahealthcaresystem
AT sultansamir implementationoflowdosectscreeningintwodifferenthealthcaresystemsmountsinaihealthcaresystemandphoenixvahealthcaresystem
AT murphylorenzaa implementationoflowdosectscreeningintwodifferenthealthcaresystemsmountsinaihealthcaresystemandphoenixvahealthcaresystem