Cargando…

Comprehensive evaluation of the clinical utility of plasma EGFR test in non-small cell lung cancer patients with acquired resistance to first-line EGFR inhibitors

BACKGROUND: Plasma epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation tests are widely used when non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients acquire resistance to EGFR inhibitors. We comprehensively evaluated the clinical utility of plasma EGFR test. METHODS: We screened NSCLC patients who had a plasm...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Hongsik, Jung, Hyun Ae, Lee, Se-Hoon, Ahn, Jin Seok, Ahn, Myung-Ju, Park, Keunchil, Sun, Jong-Mu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7947405/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33718029
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tlcr-20-1128
_version_ 1783663219294863360
author Kim, Hongsik
Jung, Hyun Ae
Lee, Se-Hoon
Ahn, Jin Seok
Ahn, Myung-Ju
Park, Keunchil
Sun, Jong-Mu
author_facet Kim, Hongsik
Jung, Hyun Ae
Lee, Se-Hoon
Ahn, Jin Seok
Ahn, Myung-Ju
Park, Keunchil
Sun, Jong-Mu
author_sort Kim, Hongsik
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Plasma epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation tests are widely used when non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients acquire resistance to EGFR inhibitors. We comprehensively evaluated the clinical utility of plasma EGFR test. METHODS: We screened NSCLC patients who had a plasma EGFR test upon acquiring resistance to first- or second-generation EGFR inhibitors. Plasma EGFR tests were performed with the EGFR mutation test. RESULTS: A total of 355 patients were tested for plasma EGFR mutations, and T790M was detected in 83 patients (23%). Of 79 patients who were tested multiple times, T790M was newly detected in 13 subsequent plasma tests. When initial plasma tests did not detect any EGFR mutation types, the detection rate of T790M in subsequent tests was very low (9%, 5/56), while detection rates of T790M in subsequent tests increased (35%, 8/23) in those individuals in whom sensitizing mutations had been detected in the initial plasma test (P=0.005). Paired plasma and tissue EGFR test results were available for 235 patients. Sensitivity and specificity of the plasma tests for T790M were 14% and 87%, respectively. Among 235 patients, 140 patients had tissue EGFR tests performed after T790M-negative plasma results were reported. The subsequent tissue test detected T790M in 61% (44/72) of these patients when any EGFR mutations were not detected in prior plasma tests, while the detection rate of T790M in subsequent tissue tests was 37% (25/68) when sensitizing mutations were detected in prior plasma tests (P=0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Because the sensitivity of plasma EGFR test for T790M is low, follow-up tissue or plasma tests are necessary. Presence or absence of a sensitizing mutation in the initial plasma tests can be used to determine which samples (tissue or plasma) should be submitted for further testing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7947405
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79474052021-03-12 Comprehensive evaluation of the clinical utility of plasma EGFR test in non-small cell lung cancer patients with acquired resistance to first-line EGFR inhibitors Kim, Hongsik Jung, Hyun Ae Lee, Se-Hoon Ahn, Jin Seok Ahn, Myung-Ju Park, Keunchil Sun, Jong-Mu Transl Lung Cancer Res Original Article BACKGROUND: Plasma epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation tests are widely used when non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients acquire resistance to EGFR inhibitors. We comprehensively evaluated the clinical utility of plasma EGFR test. METHODS: We screened NSCLC patients who had a plasma EGFR test upon acquiring resistance to first- or second-generation EGFR inhibitors. Plasma EGFR tests were performed with the EGFR mutation test. RESULTS: A total of 355 patients were tested for plasma EGFR mutations, and T790M was detected in 83 patients (23%). Of 79 patients who were tested multiple times, T790M was newly detected in 13 subsequent plasma tests. When initial plasma tests did not detect any EGFR mutation types, the detection rate of T790M in subsequent tests was very low (9%, 5/56), while detection rates of T790M in subsequent tests increased (35%, 8/23) in those individuals in whom sensitizing mutations had been detected in the initial plasma test (P=0.005). Paired plasma and tissue EGFR test results were available for 235 patients. Sensitivity and specificity of the plasma tests for T790M were 14% and 87%, respectively. Among 235 patients, 140 patients had tissue EGFR tests performed after T790M-negative plasma results were reported. The subsequent tissue test detected T790M in 61% (44/72) of these patients when any EGFR mutations were not detected in prior plasma tests, while the detection rate of T790M in subsequent tissue tests was 37% (25/68) when sensitizing mutations were detected in prior plasma tests (P=0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Because the sensitivity of plasma EGFR test for T790M is low, follow-up tissue or plasma tests are necessary. Presence or absence of a sensitizing mutation in the initial plasma tests can be used to determine which samples (tissue or plasma) should be submitted for further testing. AME Publishing Company 2021-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7947405/ /pubmed/33718029 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tlcr-20-1128 Text en 2021 Translational Lung Cancer Research. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Kim, Hongsik
Jung, Hyun Ae
Lee, Se-Hoon
Ahn, Jin Seok
Ahn, Myung-Ju
Park, Keunchil
Sun, Jong-Mu
Comprehensive evaluation of the clinical utility of plasma EGFR test in non-small cell lung cancer patients with acquired resistance to first-line EGFR inhibitors
title Comprehensive evaluation of the clinical utility of plasma EGFR test in non-small cell lung cancer patients with acquired resistance to first-line EGFR inhibitors
title_full Comprehensive evaluation of the clinical utility of plasma EGFR test in non-small cell lung cancer patients with acquired resistance to first-line EGFR inhibitors
title_fullStr Comprehensive evaluation of the clinical utility of plasma EGFR test in non-small cell lung cancer patients with acquired resistance to first-line EGFR inhibitors
title_full_unstemmed Comprehensive evaluation of the clinical utility of plasma EGFR test in non-small cell lung cancer patients with acquired resistance to first-line EGFR inhibitors
title_short Comprehensive evaluation of the clinical utility of plasma EGFR test in non-small cell lung cancer patients with acquired resistance to first-line EGFR inhibitors
title_sort comprehensive evaluation of the clinical utility of plasma egfr test in non-small cell lung cancer patients with acquired resistance to first-line egfr inhibitors
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7947405/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33718029
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tlcr-20-1128
work_keys_str_mv AT kimhongsik comprehensiveevaluationoftheclinicalutilityofplasmaegfrtestinnonsmallcelllungcancerpatientswithacquiredresistancetofirstlineegfrinhibitors
AT junghyunae comprehensiveevaluationoftheclinicalutilityofplasmaegfrtestinnonsmallcelllungcancerpatientswithacquiredresistancetofirstlineegfrinhibitors
AT leesehoon comprehensiveevaluationoftheclinicalutilityofplasmaegfrtestinnonsmallcelllungcancerpatientswithacquiredresistancetofirstlineegfrinhibitors
AT ahnjinseok comprehensiveevaluationoftheclinicalutilityofplasmaegfrtestinnonsmallcelllungcancerpatientswithacquiredresistancetofirstlineegfrinhibitors
AT ahnmyungju comprehensiveevaluationoftheclinicalutilityofplasmaegfrtestinnonsmallcelllungcancerpatientswithacquiredresistancetofirstlineegfrinhibitors
AT parkkeunchil comprehensiveevaluationoftheclinicalutilityofplasmaegfrtestinnonsmallcelllungcancerpatientswithacquiredresistancetofirstlineegfrinhibitors
AT sunjongmu comprehensiveevaluationoftheclinicalutilityofplasmaegfrtestinnonsmallcelllungcancerpatientswithacquiredresistancetofirstlineegfrinhibitors