Cargando…

Urethral plate in tubularized incised plate urethroplasty: how wide is enough?

BACKGROUND: Previous reports found that a preincision urethral plate (UP) width <8 mm increased the occurrence of urethroplasty complications (UCs) in tubularized incised plate (TIP) hypospadias repair. However, is the classification of the UP width based on an 8 mm cut-off value to predict the o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Bin, Ruan, Shuangsui, Bi, Yunli
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7947469/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33718072
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau-20-1243
_version_ 1783663234780233728
author Zhang, Bin
Ruan, Shuangsui
Bi, Yunli
author_facet Zhang, Bin
Ruan, Shuangsui
Bi, Yunli
author_sort Zhang, Bin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Previous reports found that a preincision urethral plate (UP) width <8 mm increased the occurrence of urethroplasty complications (UCs) in tubularized incised plate (TIP) hypospadias repair. However, is the classification of the UP width based on an 8 mm cut-off value to predict the outcome of TIP urethroplasty objective enough or universally applicable? The purpose of our study was to assess the effect of the UP width on the outcomes of TIP hypospadias repair in the Eastern population we served. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of patients who underwent TIP hypospadias repair by the same surgeon between August 2013 and December 2019 in our hospital. Data were collected, including demographics, intrinsic parameters of the penis, surgical parameters and subsequent surgical outcomes. The data were analyzed and the cut-off value of the UP width was calculated using a receiving-operator curve. RESULTS: Primary TIP urethroplasty was carried out in 116 patients with a mean age of 35.89±29.40 months. The meatal location was distal in 49 patients, midshaft in 56 patients and proximal in 11 patients. The mean glans width was 12.28±1.36 mm, the mean UP width was 5.74±1.37 mm, the mean neourethral length was 1.96±1.32 cm, and the mean operation duration was 87.52±11.47 min. During a median follow-up of 42 (range: 6 to 80) months, UCs developed in 12 patients, and the UP width was significantly related to the occurrence of UCs (P=0.014). According to the 6 mm cut-off value of the UP width by the receiver operating characteristic curve, patients were divided into two groups. Group A (UP width ≥6 mm) included 69 patients, and Group B (UP width <6 mm), 47 patients. UCs occurred in 3 patients in Group A vs. 9 patients in Group B, P=0.010. CONCLUSIONS: UP width is a potential risk factor for UCs after TIP hypospadias repair. Using this technique with an UP width ≥6 mm is sufficient to result in a good outcome of hypospadias repair.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7947469
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79474692021-03-12 Urethral plate in tubularized incised plate urethroplasty: how wide is enough? Zhang, Bin Ruan, Shuangsui Bi, Yunli Transl Androl Urol Original Article BACKGROUND: Previous reports found that a preincision urethral plate (UP) width <8 mm increased the occurrence of urethroplasty complications (UCs) in tubularized incised plate (TIP) hypospadias repair. However, is the classification of the UP width based on an 8 mm cut-off value to predict the outcome of TIP urethroplasty objective enough or universally applicable? The purpose of our study was to assess the effect of the UP width on the outcomes of TIP hypospadias repair in the Eastern population we served. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of patients who underwent TIP hypospadias repair by the same surgeon between August 2013 and December 2019 in our hospital. Data were collected, including demographics, intrinsic parameters of the penis, surgical parameters and subsequent surgical outcomes. The data were analyzed and the cut-off value of the UP width was calculated using a receiving-operator curve. RESULTS: Primary TIP urethroplasty was carried out in 116 patients with a mean age of 35.89±29.40 months. The meatal location was distal in 49 patients, midshaft in 56 patients and proximal in 11 patients. The mean glans width was 12.28±1.36 mm, the mean UP width was 5.74±1.37 mm, the mean neourethral length was 1.96±1.32 cm, and the mean operation duration was 87.52±11.47 min. During a median follow-up of 42 (range: 6 to 80) months, UCs developed in 12 patients, and the UP width was significantly related to the occurrence of UCs (P=0.014). According to the 6 mm cut-off value of the UP width by the receiver operating characteristic curve, patients were divided into two groups. Group A (UP width ≥6 mm) included 69 patients, and Group B (UP width <6 mm), 47 patients. UCs occurred in 3 patients in Group A vs. 9 patients in Group B, P=0.010. CONCLUSIONS: UP width is a potential risk factor for UCs after TIP hypospadias repair. Using this technique with an UP width ≥6 mm is sufficient to result in a good outcome of hypospadias repair. AME Publishing Company 2021-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7947469/ /pubmed/33718072 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau-20-1243 Text en 2021 Translational Andrology and Urology. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Zhang, Bin
Ruan, Shuangsui
Bi, Yunli
Urethral plate in tubularized incised plate urethroplasty: how wide is enough?
title Urethral plate in tubularized incised plate urethroplasty: how wide is enough?
title_full Urethral plate in tubularized incised plate urethroplasty: how wide is enough?
title_fullStr Urethral plate in tubularized incised plate urethroplasty: how wide is enough?
title_full_unstemmed Urethral plate in tubularized incised plate urethroplasty: how wide is enough?
title_short Urethral plate in tubularized incised plate urethroplasty: how wide is enough?
title_sort urethral plate in tubularized incised plate urethroplasty: how wide is enough?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7947469/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33718072
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau-20-1243
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangbin urethralplateintubularizedincisedplateurethroplastyhowwideisenough
AT ruanshuangsui urethralplateintubularizedincisedplateurethroplastyhowwideisenough
AT biyunli urethralplateintubularizedincisedplateurethroplastyhowwideisenough