Cargando…

Femoral arterial cannulation remains a safe and reliable option for aortic dissection repair

BACKGROUND: The optimal cannulation site for repair of type A aortic dissection remains controversial. The concern for Malperfusion syndrome has initiated a national trend away from femoral cannulation to axillary artery and direct ascending aortic cannulation. The purpose of this study was to repor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lemaire, Anthony, Chao, Joshua, Salgueiro, Lauren, Ikegami, Hirohisa, Lee, Leonard Y.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7947496/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33717573
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-20-2549
_version_ 1783663241178644480
author Lemaire, Anthony
Chao, Joshua
Salgueiro, Lauren
Ikegami, Hirohisa
Lee, Leonard Y.
author_facet Lemaire, Anthony
Chao, Joshua
Salgueiro, Lauren
Ikegami, Hirohisa
Lee, Leonard Y.
author_sort Lemaire, Anthony
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The optimal cannulation site for repair of type A aortic dissection remains controversial. The concern for Malperfusion syndrome has initiated a national trend away from femoral cannulation to axillary artery and direct ascending aortic cannulation. The purpose of this study was to report a single center experience with femoral artery cannulation for the repair of a type A dissection. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed on 52 patients who underwent surgical repair for a type A dissection between January 1(st), 2012 and June 30(th), 2019 at a single institution. Of the 52 patients analyzed, 35 (67.3%) underwent femoral artery, 11 (21.2%) direct ascending aortic, and 6 (11%) axillary artery cannulation for arterial access. Deep hypothermic circulatory arrest was used in all the patients. Rates of postoperative complication and mortality were reported. RESULTS: The mortality and bleeding rates for all the patients undergoing repair of the type A dissection repairs were 27% (14/52) and 19% (10/52), respectively. Cardiopulmonary bypass was established in 100% of the patients that had femoral arterial cannulation. There were no complications specifically related to femoral arterial cannulation nor the axillary or direct aortic approach. Specifically, there was no episodes of malperfusion syndrome, bleeding, or injury with femoral artery cannulation. Bleeding rates were higher in cases that proceeded with a femoral (13%) versus alternate (6%) approach however; neither of the bleeding was related to the cannulation site. None of the mortalities identified were directly attributable to the cannulation approach in each case. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the recent shift away from femoral cannulation, the results of the study show that femoral artery cannulation is safe and produces excellent results for establishing cardiopulmonary bypass. The concerns for malperfusion syndrome related to femoral cannulation were not seen.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7947496
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79474962021-03-12 Femoral arterial cannulation remains a safe and reliable option for aortic dissection repair Lemaire, Anthony Chao, Joshua Salgueiro, Lauren Ikegami, Hirohisa Lee, Leonard Y. J Thorac Dis Original Article BACKGROUND: The optimal cannulation site for repair of type A aortic dissection remains controversial. The concern for Malperfusion syndrome has initiated a national trend away from femoral cannulation to axillary artery and direct ascending aortic cannulation. The purpose of this study was to report a single center experience with femoral artery cannulation for the repair of a type A dissection. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed on 52 patients who underwent surgical repair for a type A dissection between January 1(st), 2012 and June 30(th), 2019 at a single institution. Of the 52 patients analyzed, 35 (67.3%) underwent femoral artery, 11 (21.2%) direct ascending aortic, and 6 (11%) axillary artery cannulation for arterial access. Deep hypothermic circulatory arrest was used in all the patients. Rates of postoperative complication and mortality were reported. RESULTS: The mortality and bleeding rates for all the patients undergoing repair of the type A dissection repairs were 27% (14/52) and 19% (10/52), respectively. Cardiopulmonary bypass was established in 100% of the patients that had femoral arterial cannulation. There were no complications specifically related to femoral arterial cannulation nor the axillary or direct aortic approach. Specifically, there was no episodes of malperfusion syndrome, bleeding, or injury with femoral artery cannulation. Bleeding rates were higher in cases that proceeded with a femoral (13%) versus alternate (6%) approach however; neither of the bleeding was related to the cannulation site. None of the mortalities identified were directly attributable to the cannulation approach in each case. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the recent shift away from femoral cannulation, the results of the study show that femoral artery cannulation is safe and produces excellent results for establishing cardiopulmonary bypass. The concerns for malperfusion syndrome related to femoral cannulation were not seen. AME Publishing Company 2021-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7947496/ /pubmed/33717573 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-20-2549 Text en 2021 Journal of Thoracic Disease. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Lemaire, Anthony
Chao, Joshua
Salgueiro, Lauren
Ikegami, Hirohisa
Lee, Leonard Y.
Femoral arterial cannulation remains a safe and reliable option for aortic dissection repair
title Femoral arterial cannulation remains a safe and reliable option for aortic dissection repair
title_full Femoral arterial cannulation remains a safe and reliable option for aortic dissection repair
title_fullStr Femoral arterial cannulation remains a safe and reliable option for aortic dissection repair
title_full_unstemmed Femoral arterial cannulation remains a safe and reliable option for aortic dissection repair
title_short Femoral arterial cannulation remains a safe and reliable option for aortic dissection repair
title_sort femoral arterial cannulation remains a safe and reliable option for aortic dissection repair
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7947496/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33717573
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-20-2549
work_keys_str_mv AT lemaireanthony femoralarterialcannulationremainsasafeandreliableoptionforaorticdissectionrepair
AT chaojoshua femoralarterialcannulationremainsasafeandreliableoptionforaorticdissectionrepair
AT salgueirolauren femoralarterialcannulationremainsasafeandreliableoptionforaorticdissectionrepair
AT ikegamihirohisa femoralarterialcannulationremainsasafeandreliableoptionforaorticdissectionrepair
AT leeleonardy femoralarterialcannulationremainsasafeandreliableoptionforaorticdissectionrepair