Cargando…
No-waiting segmentectomy: an optimized approach for segmentectomy
BACKGROUND: Currently, modified inflation–deflation is considered the easiest way to identify the intersegmental plane during pulmonary segmentectomy. However, this approach requires a wait of about 10–20 min during the operative procedure. Therefore, we optimized the procedure, which we call no-wai...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AME Publishing Company
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7947514/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33717551 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-20-2661 |
_version_ | 1783663245396017152 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Changchun Cai, Lei Chen, Qian Xu, Xiaofang Liang, Jinxiao Mao, Weimin Chen, Qixun |
author_facet | Wang, Changchun Cai, Lei Chen, Qian Xu, Xiaofang Liang, Jinxiao Mao, Weimin Chen, Qixun |
author_sort | Wang, Changchun |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Currently, modified inflation–deflation is considered the easiest way to identify the intersegmental plane during pulmonary segmentectomy. However, this approach requires a wait of about 10–20 min during the operative procedure. Therefore, we optimized the procedure, which we call no-waiting segmentectomy. In this study, we compared no-waiting segmentectomy with the modified inflation–deflation method. METHODS: We studied 123 consecutive patients with pulmonary ground-glass nodules who underwent segmentectomy by uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in a single medical group from January 2019 to April 2020. Forty-five patients underwent the modified inflation–deflation method and 78 patients underwent the no-waiting method. The no-waiting procedure involved severing of the target segmental pulmonary artery, inflating the lung with atmospheric air, dissecting the hilum, and dividing the target segmental bronchus. The entire procedure could be performed at a stretch and no pause was needed. We compared the two methods for surgery time, bleeding volume, drainage time, and postoperative hospital stay. Propensity-score matching was used to adjust the baseline characteristics. RESULTS: Thirty-three pairs of 123 patients were successfully matched. Before propensity-score matching, there was no difference between the two methods in terms of surgery time, bleeding volume, drainage time, and postoperative hospital stay. After propensity-score matching, the surgery time in the no-waiting group was significantly shorter than that in the modified inflation–deflation method group (80.12±35.53 vs. 102.97±48.07 min, P=0.03). There was no difference between the two methods in terms of bleeding volume, drainage time, and postoperative hospital stay. CONCLUSIONS: No-waiting segmentectomy was associated with a reduced surgery time, compared to that associated with modified inflation–deflation segmentectomy. Furthermore, no-waiting segmentectomy did not increase bleeding volume, drainage time, and postoperative hospital stay. Thus, no-waiting segmentectomy is an optional optimized approach for segmentectomy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7947514 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | AME Publishing Company |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79475142021-03-12 No-waiting segmentectomy: an optimized approach for segmentectomy Wang, Changchun Cai, Lei Chen, Qian Xu, Xiaofang Liang, Jinxiao Mao, Weimin Chen, Qixun J Thorac Dis Original Article BACKGROUND: Currently, modified inflation–deflation is considered the easiest way to identify the intersegmental plane during pulmonary segmentectomy. However, this approach requires a wait of about 10–20 min during the operative procedure. Therefore, we optimized the procedure, which we call no-waiting segmentectomy. In this study, we compared no-waiting segmentectomy with the modified inflation–deflation method. METHODS: We studied 123 consecutive patients with pulmonary ground-glass nodules who underwent segmentectomy by uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in a single medical group from January 2019 to April 2020. Forty-five patients underwent the modified inflation–deflation method and 78 patients underwent the no-waiting method. The no-waiting procedure involved severing of the target segmental pulmonary artery, inflating the lung with atmospheric air, dissecting the hilum, and dividing the target segmental bronchus. The entire procedure could be performed at a stretch and no pause was needed. We compared the two methods for surgery time, bleeding volume, drainage time, and postoperative hospital stay. Propensity-score matching was used to adjust the baseline characteristics. RESULTS: Thirty-three pairs of 123 patients were successfully matched. Before propensity-score matching, there was no difference between the two methods in terms of surgery time, bleeding volume, drainage time, and postoperative hospital stay. After propensity-score matching, the surgery time in the no-waiting group was significantly shorter than that in the modified inflation–deflation method group (80.12±35.53 vs. 102.97±48.07 min, P=0.03). There was no difference between the two methods in terms of bleeding volume, drainage time, and postoperative hospital stay. CONCLUSIONS: No-waiting segmentectomy was associated with a reduced surgery time, compared to that associated with modified inflation–deflation segmentectomy. Furthermore, no-waiting segmentectomy did not increase bleeding volume, drainage time, and postoperative hospital stay. Thus, no-waiting segmentectomy is an optional optimized approach for segmentectomy. AME Publishing Company 2021-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7947514/ /pubmed/33717551 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-20-2661 Text en 2021 Journal of Thoracic Disease. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Wang, Changchun Cai, Lei Chen, Qian Xu, Xiaofang Liang, Jinxiao Mao, Weimin Chen, Qixun No-waiting segmentectomy: an optimized approach for segmentectomy |
title | No-waiting segmentectomy: an optimized approach for segmentectomy |
title_full | No-waiting segmentectomy: an optimized approach for segmentectomy |
title_fullStr | No-waiting segmentectomy: an optimized approach for segmentectomy |
title_full_unstemmed | No-waiting segmentectomy: an optimized approach for segmentectomy |
title_short | No-waiting segmentectomy: an optimized approach for segmentectomy |
title_sort | no-waiting segmentectomy: an optimized approach for segmentectomy |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7947514/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33717551 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-20-2661 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wangchangchun nowaitingsegmentectomyanoptimizedapproachforsegmentectomy AT cailei nowaitingsegmentectomyanoptimizedapproachforsegmentectomy AT chenqian nowaitingsegmentectomyanoptimizedapproachforsegmentectomy AT xuxiaofang nowaitingsegmentectomyanoptimizedapproachforsegmentectomy AT liangjinxiao nowaitingsegmentectomyanoptimizedapproachforsegmentectomy AT maoweimin nowaitingsegmentectomyanoptimizedapproachforsegmentectomy AT chenqixun nowaitingsegmentectomyanoptimizedapproachforsegmentectomy |