Cargando…

After-hours esophagectomy may pose additional risk to patients with esophageal cancer

BACKGROUND: The increase in the incidence of esophageal cancers (ECs) combined with fewer surgeons working at large centers will increase the likelihood of surgery for ECs being performed during later hours. This study aimed to compare esophagectomies’ operative outcomes for EC performed at differen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tu, De-Hao, Qu, Rirong, Wang, Qi, Fu, Xiangning
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7947526/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33717585
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-20-3141
_version_ 1783663248216686592
author Tu, De-Hao
Qu, Rirong
Wang, Qi
Fu, Xiangning
author_facet Tu, De-Hao
Qu, Rirong
Wang, Qi
Fu, Xiangning
author_sort Tu, De-Hao
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The increase in the incidence of esophageal cancers (ECs) combined with fewer surgeons working at large centers will increase the likelihood of surgery for ECs being performed during later hours. This study aimed to compare esophagectomies’ operative outcomes for EC performed at different surgical starting times. METHODS: This was a single-center, retrospective study. Risk-adjusted cumulative sum curve analysis and Cox regression analysis were used to identify the potential change-point of surgical starting times. The participants were then divided into 2 groups according to the change-point time. Propensity score matching was used to control confounding factors between the 2 groups. We compared the short- and long-term outcomes in both groups. RESULTS: A total of 702 patients who underwent potentially radical esophagectomy from 7 May 2014 to 31 December 2017 in our institute were included. The 3-year all-cause mortality showed a significant change-point at 16:42, with an increment from 56.5% to 76.9% (P=0.043). Esophagectomy that commenced between 17:00–18:59 was associated with significantly lower overall survival (OS) [multivariate hazard ratio (HR): 2.47; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.25 to 4.90; P=0.010] and disease-free survival (DFS) (multivariate HR: 2.14; 95% CI: 1.08 to 4.21; P=0.028). The participants were allocated to the during-hours group and the after-hours group according to the change-point of 17:00. A total of 84 participants in the during-hours group were matched to 33 participants in the after-hours group. The median operative time was shorter in the after-hours group [309 (during-hours) vs. 239 (after-hours) minutes, P=0.014); the after-hours group had a greater incidence of respiratory complications (22.63% vs. 45.45%, P=0.023) and 90-day mortality (0 vs. 9.09%, P=0.021). The 5-year OS (P=0.042) and DFS (P=0.030) were significantly higher in the during-hours group. CONCLUSIONS: Esophagectomies started during after-hours are correlated with poorer surgical outcomes. It is recommended to cancel selective esophagectomies due to commence after 17:00.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7947526
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79475262021-03-12 After-hours esophagectomy may pose additional risk to patients with esophageal cancer Tu, De-Hao Qu, Rirong Wang, Qi Fu, Xiangning J Thorac Dis Original Article BACKGROUND: The increase in the incidence of esophageal cancers (ECs) combined with fewer surgeons working at large centers will increase the likelihood of surgery for ECs being performed during later hours. This study aimed to compare esophagectomies’ operative outcomes for EC performed at different surgical starting times. METHODS: This was a single-center, retrospective study. Risk-adjusted cumulative sum curve analysis and Cox regression analysis were used to identify the potential change-point of surgical starting times. The participants were then divided into 2 groups according to the change-point time. Propensity score matching was used to control confounding factors between the 2 groups. We compared the short- and long-term outcomes in both groups. RESULTS: A total of 702 patients who underwent potentially radical esophagectomy from 7 May 2014 to 31 December 2017 in our institute were included. The 3-year all-cause mortality showed a significant change-point at 16:42, with an increment from 56.5% to 76.9% (P=0.043). Esophagectomy that commenced between 17:00–18:59 was associated with significantly lower overall survival (OS) [multivariate hazard ratio (HR): 2.47; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.25 to 4.90; P=0.010] and disease-free survival (DFS) (multivariate HR: 2.14; 95% CI: 1.08 to 4.21; P=0.028). The participants were allocated to the during-hours group and the after-hours group according to the change-point of 17:00. A total of 84 participants in the during-hours group were matched to 33 participants in the after-hours group. The median operative time was shorter in the after-hours group [309 (during-hours) vs. 239 (after-hours) minutes, P=0.014); the after-hours group had a greater incidence of respiratory complications (22.63% vs. 45.45%, P=0.023) and 90-day mortality (0 vs. 9.09%, P=0.021). The 5-year OS (P=0.042) and DFS (P=0.030) were significantly higher in the during-hours group. CONCLUSIONS: Esophagectomies started during after-hours are correlated with poorer surgical outcomes. It is recommended to cancel selective esophagectomies due to commence after 17:00. AME Publishing Company 2021-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7947526/ /pubmed/33717585 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-20-3141 Text en 2021 Journal of Thoracic Disease. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Tu, De-Hao
Qu, Rirong
Wang, Qi
Fu, Xiangning
After-hours esophagectomy may pose additional risk to patients with esophageal cancer
title After-hours esophagectomy may pose additional risk to patients with esophageal cancer
title_full After-hours esophagectomy may pose additional risk to patients with esophageal cancer
title_fullStr After-hours esophagectomy may pose additional risk to patients with esophageal cancer
title_full_unstemmed After-hours esophagectomy may pose additional risk to patients with esophageal cancer
title_short After-hours esophagectomy may pose additional risk to patients with esophageal cancer
title_sort after-hours esophagectomy may pose additional risk to patients with esophageal cancer
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7947526/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33717585
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-20-3141
work_keys_str_mv AT tudehao afterhoursesophagectomymayposeadditionalrisktopatientswithesophagealcancer
AT qurirong afterhoursesophagectomymayposeadditionalrisktopatientswithesophagealcancer
AT wangqi afterhoursesophagectomymayposeadditionalrisktopatientswithesophagealcancer
AT fuxiangning afterhoursesophagectomymayposeadditionalrisktopatientswithesophagealcancer