Cargando…

A single institutional experience with central lung stereotactic body radiation therapy demonstrating encouraging results with increased inter-fraction time

BACKGROUND: Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is an effective treatment modality for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, there are concerns regarding potential toxicity for centrally located tumors. METHODS: This retrospective study considered patients with SBRT for central lung NS...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kowalchuk, Roman O., Waters, Michael R., Richardson, K. Martin, Spencer, Kelly M., Larner, James M., Kersh, Charles R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7947542/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33717537
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-20-2659
_version_ 1783663251967442944
author Kowalchuk, Roman O.
Waters, Michael R.
Richardson, K. Martin
Spencer, Kelly M.
Larner, James M.
Kersh, Charles R.
author_facet Kowalchuk, Roman O.
Waters, Michael R.
Richardson, K. Martin
Spencer, Kelly M.
Larner, James M.
Kersh, Charles R.
author_sort Kowalchuk, Roman O.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is an effective treatment modality for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, there are concerns regarding potential toxicity for centrally located tumors. METHODS: This retrospective study considered patients with SBRT for central lung NSCLC (defined as a tumor within 2 cm of any mediastinal critical structure). The institutional protocol was that patients with central tumors received SBRT less frequently than daily—generally once or twice weekly. RESULTS: A total of 115 patients with 148 lesions were treated with SBRT to a median 45 [5–60] Gy in 4 [1–5] fractions over a median 5.3 [0–18] days. Many patients treated with this method presented with advanced disease: 58 treatments involved nodal targets, and 42 had stage 3 disease. 52% of patients had chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and only 49% had a biopsy, often due to concerns regarding other medical comorbidities. Rates of prior chemotherapy, thoracic surgery, and thoracic radiotherapy were 32%, 21%, and 49%, respectively. Via the Kaplan-Meier method, 2-year overall survival was 65%, and 2-year local control was 77%. Two-year local-progression free survival was 53%, and 2-year progression-survival was 48%. Treatments for stage 3 disease had an impressive 82% 2-year local control that was comparable to early stage treatments. Patients with stage 3 disease had a 2-year overall survival of 59%, which trended towards decreased overall survival compared to early stage patients. There were 13 grade 1 (9%) and 14 grade 2 (9%) toxicities. There were no reported grade ≥3 acute or late toxicities and only 3 cases of pneumonitis. CONCLUSIONS: Our series demonstrates encouraging local control with low rates of toxicity for central lung SBRT, including many stage 3 patients. This may be the result of the relatively large inter-fraction interval. This interval may allow for greater tumor effects (such as reoxygenation) and improved tolerance from normal tissues.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7947542
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79475422021-03-12 A single institutional experience with central lung stereotactic body radiation therapy demonstrating encouraging results with increased inter-fraction time Kowalchuk, Roman O. Waters, Michael R. Richardson, K. Martin Spencer, Kelly M. Larner, James M. Kersh, Charles R. J Thorac Dis Original Article BACKGROUND: Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is an effective treatment modality for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, there are concerns regarding potential toxicity for centrally located tumors. METHODS: This retrospective study considered patients with SBRT for central lung NSCLC (defined as a tumor within 2 cm of any mediastinal critical structure). The institutional protocol was that patients with central tumors received SBRT less frequently than daily—generally once or twice weekly. RESULTS: A total of 115 patients with 148 lesions were treated with SBRT to a median 45 [5–60] Gy in 4 [1–5] fractions over a median 5.3 [0–18] days. Many patients treated with this method presented with advanced disease: 58 treatments involved nodal targets, and 42 had stage 3 disease. 52% of patients had chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and only 49% had a biopsy, often due to concerns regarding other medical comorbidities. Rates of prior chemotherapy, thoracic surgery, and thoracic radiotherapy were 32%, 21%, and 49%, respectively. Via the Kaplan-Meier method, 2-year overall survival was 65%, and 2-year local control was 77%. Two-year local-progression free survival was 53%, and 2-year progression-survival was 48%. Treatments for stage 3 disease had an impressive 82% 2-year local control that was comparable to early stage treatments. Patients with stage 3 disease had a 2-year overall survival of 59%, which trended towards decreased overall survival compared to early stage patients. There were 13 grade 1 (9%) and 14 grade 2 (9%) toxicities. There were no reported grade ≥3 acute or late toxicities and only 3 cases of pneumonitis. CONCLUSIONS: Our series demonstrates encouraging local control with low rates of toxicity for central lung SBRT, including many stage 3 patients. This may be the result of the relatively large inter-fraction interval. This interval may allow for greater tumor effects (such as reoxygenation) and improved tolerance from normal tissues. AME Publishing Company 2021-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7947542/ /pubmed/33717537 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-20-2659 Text en 2021 Journal of Thoracic Disease. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Kowalchuk, Roman O.
Waters, Michael R.
Richardson, K. Martin
Spencer, Kelly M.
Larner, James M.
Kersh, Charles R.
A single institutional experience with central lung stereotactic body radiation therapy demonstrating encouraging results with increased inter-fraction time
title A single institutional experience with central lung stereotactic body radiation therapy demonstrating encouraging results with increased inter-fraction time
title_full A single institutional experience with central lung stereotactic body radiation therapy demonstrating encouraging results with increased inter-fraction time
title_fullStr A single institutional experience with central lung stereotactic body radiation therapy demonstrating encouraging results with increased inter-fraction time
title_full_unstemmed A single institutional experience with central lung stereotactic body radiation therapy demonstrating encouraging results with increased inter-fraction time
title_short A single institutional experience with central lung stereotactic body radiation therapy demonstrating encouraging results with increased inter-fraction time
title_sort single institutional experience with central lung stereotactic body radiation therapy demonstrating encouraging results with increased inter-fraction time
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7947542/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33717537
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-20-2659
work_keys_str_mv AT kowalchukromano asingleinstitutionalexperiencewithcentrallungstereotacticbodyradiationtherapydemonstratingencouragingresultswithincreasedinterfractiontime
AT watersmichaelr asingleinstitutionalexperiencewithcentrallungstereotacticbodyradiationtherapydemonstratingencouragingresultswithincreasedinterfractiontime
AT richardsonkmartin asingleinstitutionalexperiencewithcentrallungstereotacticbodyradiationtherapydemonstratingencouragingresultswithincreasedinterfractiontime
AT spencerkellym asingleinstitutionalexperiencewithcentrallungstereotacticbodyradiationtherapydemonstratingencouragingresultswithincreasedinterfractiontime
AT larnerjamesm asingleinstitutionalexperiencewithcentrallungstereotacticbodyradiationtherapydemonstratingencouragingresultswithincreasedinterfractiontime
AT kershcharlesr asingleinstitutionalexperiencewithcentrallungstereotacticbodyradiationtherapydemonstratingencouragingresultswithincreasedinterfractiontime
AT kowalchukromano singleinstitutionalexperiencewithcentrallungstereotacticbodyradiationtherapydemonstratingencouragingresultswithincreasedinterfractiontime
AT watersmichaelr singleinstitutionalexperiencewithcentrallungstereotacticbodyradiationtherapydemonstratingencouragingresultswithincreasedinterfractiontime
AT richardsonkmartin singleinstitutionalexperiencewithcentrallungstereotacticbodyradiationtherapydemonstratingencouragingresultswithincreasedinterfractiontime
AT spencerkellym singleinstitutionalexperiencewithcentrallungstereotacticbodyradiationtherapydemonstratingencouragingresultswithincreasedinterfractiontime
AT larnerjamesm singleinstitutionalexperiencewithcentrallungstereotacticbodyradiationtherapydemonstratingencouragingresultswithincreasedinterfractiontime
AT kershcharlesr singleinstitutionalexperiencewithcentrallungstereotacticbodyradiationtherapydemonstratingencouragingresultswithincreasedinterfractiontime