Cargando…
Comparative Analysis of Immunohistochemical Staining Intensity Determined by Light Microscopy, ImageJ and QuPath in Placental Hofbauer Cells
Software based analyses of immunohistochemical staining are designed for obtaining quantitative, reproducible, and objective data. However, often times only a certain type of positive cells or structures need to be quantified thus whole image analysis cannot be performed. Such an example is Hofbauer...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
JAPAN SOCIETY OF HISTOCHEMISTRY AND CYTOCHEMISTRY
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7947637/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33731967 http://dx.doi.org/10.1267/ahc.20-00032 |
_version_ | 1783663269055037440 |
---|---|
author | Cizkova, Katerina Foltynkova, Tereza Gachechiladze, Mariam Tauber, Zdenek |
author_facet | Cizkova, Katerina Foltynkova, Tereza Gachechiladze, Mariam Tauber, Zdenek |
author_sort | Cizkova, Katerina |
collection | PubMed |
description | Software based analyses of immunohistochemical staining are designed for obtaining quantitative, reproducible, and objective data. However, often times only a certain type of positive cells or structures need to be quantified thus whole image analysis cannot be performed. Such an example is Hofbauer placental cells, which show positivity of some antigens together with trophoblast, but only Hofbauer cells represent the regions of interest (ROIs). Two independent observers evaluated the immunohistochemical staining intensity of Hofbauer cells in placenta samples stained for cytoplasmic antigens by ImageJ, QuPath and light microscopy. Thus, the precise manual determination of ROIs, i.e. Hofbauer cells, was necessary. We detected low inter-observer variability in staining intensity. Almost perfect agreement between observers was reached for ImageJ and QuPath whilst substantial agreement was reached for light microscopy evaluation. As for the comparison of ImageJ, QuPath and light microscopy, the agreement of all three methods (identical immunohistochemical intensity) was achieved for 38.1% samples. The almost perfect agreement of staining intensities was reached between ImageJ and QuPath, and moderate agreement for comparison of the light microscopy to both software. Software analyses are much more time-consuming, thus their utilization is at least questionable to evaluate ROIs with selection. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7947637 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | JAPAN SOCIETY OF HISTOCHEMISTRY AND CYTOCHEMISTRY |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79476372021-03-16 Comparative Analysis of Immunohistochemical Staining Intensity Determined by Light Microscopy, ImageJ and QuPath in Placental Hofbauer Cells Cizkova, Katerina Foltynkova, Tereza Gachechiladze, Mariam Tauber, Zdenek Acta Histochem Cytochem Regular Article Software based analyses of immunohistochemical staining are designed for obtaining quantitative, reproducible, and objective data. However, often times only a certain type of positive cells or structures need to be quantified thus whole image analysis cannot be performed. Such an example is Hofbauer placental cells, which show positivity of some antigens together with trophoblast, but only Hofbauer cells represent the regions of interest (ROIs). Two independent observers evaluated the immunohistochemical staining intensity of Hofbauer cells in placenta samples stained for cytoplasmic antigens by ImageJ, QuPath and light microscopy. Thus, the precise manual determination of ROIs, i.e. Hofbauer cells, was necessary. We detected low inter-observer variability in staining intensity. Almost perfect agreement between observers was reached for ImageJ and QuPath whilst substantial agreement was reached for light microscopy evaluation. As for the comparison of ImageJ, QuPath and light microscopy, the agreement of all three methods (identical immunohistochemical intensity) was achieved for 38.1% samples. The almost perfect agreement of staining intensities was reached between ImageJ and QuPath, and moderate agreement for comparison of the light microscopy to both software. Software analyses are much more time-consuming, thus their utilization is at least questionable to evaluate ROIs with selection. JAPAN SOCIETY OF HISTOCHEMISTRY AND CYTOCHEMISTRY 2021-02-25 2021-02-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7947637/ /pubmed/33731967 http://dx.doi.org/10.1267/ahc.20-00032 Text en 2021 The Japan Society of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons License (CC-BY-NC), which permits use, distribution and reproduction of the articles in any medium provided that the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Regular Article Cizkova, Katerina Foltynkova, Tereza Gachechiladze, Mariam Tauber, Zdenek Comparative Analysis of Immunohistochemical Staining Intensity Determined by Light Microscopy, ImageJ and QuPath in Placental Hofbauer Cells |
title | Comparative Analysis of Immunohistochemical Staining Intensity Determined by Light Microscopy, ImageJ and QuPath in Placental Hofbauer Cells |
title_full | Comparative Analysis of Immunohistochemical Staining Intensity Determined by Light Microscopy, ImageJ and QuPath in Placental Hofbauer Cells |
title_fullStr | Comparative Analysis of Immunohistochemical Staining Intensity Determined by Light Microscopy, ImageJ and QuPath in Placental Hofbauer Cells |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative Analysis of Immunohistochemical Staining Intensity Determined by Light Microscopy, ImageJ and QuPath in Placental Hofbauer Cells |
title_short | Comparative Analysis of Immunohistochemical Staining Intensity Determined by Light Microscopy, ImageJ and QuPath in Placental Hofbauer Cells |
title_sort | comparative analysis of immunohistochemical staining intensity determined by light microscopy, imagej and qupath in placental hofbauer cells |
topic | Regular Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7947637/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33731967 http://dx.doi.org/10.1267/ahc.20-00032 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cizkovakaterina comparativeanalysisofimmunohistochemicalstainingintensitydeterminedbylightmicroscopyimagejandqupathinplacentalhofbauercells AT foltynkovatereza comparativeanalysisofimmunohistochemicalstainingintensitydeterminedbylightmicroscopyimagejandqupathinplacentalhofbauercells AT gachechiladzemariam comparativeanalysisofimmunohistochemicalstainingintensitydeterminedbylightmicroscopyimagejandqupathinplacentalhofbauercells AT tauberzdenek comparativeanalysisofimmunohistochemicalstainingintensitydeterminedbylightmicroscopyimagejandqupathinplacentalhofbauercells |