Cargando…

Comparative Analysis of Immunohistochemical Staining Intensity Determined by Light Microscopy, ImageJ and QuPath in Placental Hofbauer Cells

Software based analyses of immunohistochemical staining are designed for obtaining quantitative, reproducible, and objective data. However, often times only a certain type of positive cells or structures need to be quantified thus whole image analysis cannot be performed. Such an example is Hofbauer...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cizkova, Katerina, Foltynkova, Tereza, Gachechiladze, Mariam, Tauber, Zdenek
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JAPAN SOCIETY OF HISTOCHEMISTRY AND CYTOCHEMISTRY 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7947637/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33731967
http://dx.doi.org/10.1267/ahc.20-00032
_version_ 1783663269055037440
author Cizkova, Katerina
Foltynkova, Tereza
Gachechiladze, Mariam
Tauber, Zdenek
author_facet Cizkova, Katerina
Foltynkova, Tereza
Gachechiladze, Mariam
Tauber, Zdenek
author_sort Cizkova, Katerina
collection PubMed
description Software based analyses of immunohistochemical staining are designed for obtaining quantitative, reproducible, and objective data. However, often times only a certain type of positive cells or structures need to be quantified thus whole image analysis cannot be performed. Such an example is Hofbauer placental cells, which show positivity of some antigens together with trophoblast, but only Hofbauer cells represent the regions of interest (ROIs). Two independent observers evaluated the immunohistochemical staining intensity of Hofbauer cells in placenta samples stained for cytoplasmic antigens by ImageJ, QuPath and light microscopy. Thus, the precise manual determination of ROIs, i.e. Hofbauer cells, was necessary. We detected low inter-observer variability in staining intensity. Almost perfect agreement between observers was reached for ImageJ and QuPath whilst substantial agreement was reached for light microscopy evaluation. As for the comparison of ImageJ, QuPath and light microscopy, the agreement of all three methods (identical immunohistochemical intensity) was achieved for 38.1% samples. The almost perfect agreement of staining intensities was reached between ImageJ and QuPath, and moderate agreement for comparison of the light microscopy to both software. Software analyses are much more time-consuming, thus their utilization is at least questionable to evaluate ROIs with selection.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7947637
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher JAPAN SOCIETY OF HISTOCHEMISTRY AND CYTOCHEMISTRY
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79476372021-03-16 Comparative Analysis of Immunohistochemical Staining Intensity Determined by Light Microscopy, ImageJ and QuPath in Placental Hofbauer Cells Cizkova, Katerina Foltynkova, Tereza Gachechiladze, Mariam Tauber, Zdenek Acta Histochem Cytochem Regular Article Software based analyses of immunohistochemical staining are designed for obtaining quantitative, reproducible, and objective data. However, often times only a certain type of positive cells or structures need to be quantified thus whole image analysis cannot be performed. Such an example is Hofbauer placental cells, which show positivity of some antigens together with trophoblast, but only Hofbauer cells represent the regions of interest (ROIs). Two independent observers evaluated the immunohistochemical staining intensity of Hofbauer cells in placenta samples stained for cytoplasmic antigens by ImageJ, QuPath and light microscopy. Thus, the precise manual determination of ROIs, i.e. Hofbauer cells, was necessary. We detected low inter-observer variability in staining intensity. Almost perfect agreement between observers was reached for ImageJ and QuPath whilst substantial agreement was reached for light microscopy evaluation. As for the comparison of ImageJ, QuPath and light microscopy, the agreement of all three methods (identical immunohistochemical intensity) was achieved for 38.1% samples. The almost perfect agreement of staining intensities was reached between ImageJ and QuPath, and moderate agreement for comparison of the light microscopy to both software. Software analyses are much more time-consuming, thus their utilization is at least questionable to evaluate ROIs with selection. JAPAN SOCIETY OF HISTOCHEMISTRY AND CYTOCHEMISTRY 2021-02-25 2021-02-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7947637/ /pubmed/33731967 http://dx.doi.org/10.1267/ahc.20-00032 Text en 2021 The Japan Society of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons License (CC-BY-NC), which permits use, distribution and reproduction of the articles in any medium provided that the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Regular Article
Cizkova, Katerina
Foltynkova, Tereza
Gachechiladze, Mariam
Tauber, Zdenek
Comparative Analysis of Immunohistochemical Staining Intensity Determined by Light Microscopy, ImageJ and QuPath in Placental Hofbauer Cells
title Comparative Analysis of Immunohistochemical Staining Intensity Determined by Light Microscopy, ImageJ and QuPath in Placental Hofbauer Cells
title_full Comparative Analysis of Immunohistochemical Staining Intensity Determined by Light Microscopy, ImageJ and QuPath in Placental Hofbauer Cells
title_fullStr Comparative Analysis of Immunohistochemical Staining Intensity Determined by Light Microscopy, ImageJ and QuPath in Placental Hofbauer Cells
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Analysis of Immunohistochemical Staining Intensity Determined by Light Microscopy, ImageJ and QuPath in Placental Hofbauer Cells
title_short Comparative Analysis of Immunohistochemical Staining Intensity Determined by Light Microscopy, ImageJ and QuPath in Placental Hofbauer Cells
title_sort comparative analysis of immunohistochemical staining intensity determined by light microscopy, imagej and qupath in placental hofbauer cells
topic Regular Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7947637/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33731967
http://dx.doi.org/10.1267/ahc.20-00032
work_keys_str_mv AT cizkovakaterina comparativeanalysisofimmunohistochemicalstainingintensitydeterminedbylightmicroscopyimagejandqupathinplacentalhofbauercells
AT foltynkovatereza comparativeanalysisofimmunohistochemicalstainingintensitydeterminedbylightmicroscopyimagejandqupathinplacentalhofbauercells
AT gachechiladzemariam comparativeanalysisofimmunohistochemicalstainingintensitydeterminedbylightmicroscopyimagejandqupathinplacentalhofbauercells
AT tauberzdenek comparativeanalysisofimmunohistochemicalstainingintensitydeterminedbylightmicroscopyimagejandqupathinplacentalhofbauercells