Cargando…

A comparison between mometasone furoate nasal spray and intranasal glycyrrhetic acid in patients with allergic rhinitis: a preliminary study in clinical practice

Allergic rhinitis (AR) is caused by an IgE-mediated inflammatory reaction consequent to the exposure to the causal allergen. Glycyrrhetic acid (GlyAc) is a natural compound extracted from the liquorice that exerts anti-inflammatory activity. This real-life study compared intranasal GlyAc, present in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gariuc, Lucia, Sandul, Alexandru, Rusu, Daniela, Passali, Desiderio, Bellussi, Luisa Maria, Damiani, Valerio, Ciprandi, Giorgio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Mattioli 1885 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7947735/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32073564
http://dx.doi.org/10.23750/abm.v91i1-S.9229
_version_ 1783663290638925824
author Gariuc, Lucia
Sandul, Alexandru
Rusu, Daniela
Passali, Desiderio
Bellussi, Luisa Maria
Damiani, Valerio
Ciprandi, Giorgio
author_facet Gariuc, Lucia
Sandul, Alexandru
Rusu, Daniela
Passali, Desiderio
Bellussi, Luisa Maria
Damiani, Valerio
Ciprandi, Giorgio
author_sort Gariuc, Lucia
collection PubMed
description Allergic rhinitis (AR) is caused by an IgE-mediated inflammatory reaction consequent to the exposure to the causal allergen. Glycyrrhetic acid (GlyAc) is a natural compound extracted from the liquorice that exerts anti-inflammatory activity. This real-life study compared intranasal GlyAc, present in a medical device containing also glycerol and mannitol, with mometasone furoate nasal spray (MFNS) in 50 adult outpatients with AR. Both treatments lasted 2 months. Endoscopic signs, perception of symptom severity, assessed by VAS, and nasal function measured by rhinomanometry were evaluated at baseline (T0), after one (T1) and two (T2) months. The intergroup analysis showed that at T1 there was no significant difference between groups about the use of decongestants and antihistamines, turbinate hypertrophy and pale mucosa, perception of olfaction and snoring. At T2 there was no significant difference between groups about use of relievers, all endoscopic signs, and perception of nasal discomfort, nasal obstruction, olfaction, and snoring. The intragroup analysis showed that in MFNS group there was a significant change during the entire period of treatment for all parameters except watery rhinorrhea (sign) and ocular discomfort; in GlyAc group there was a significant change during the entire period of treatment for all parameters. In conclusion, this preliminary study, conducted in clinical practice, evidenced that intranasal CysAC plus mannitol was able to significantly improve nasal endoscopic signs, perception of symptoms, and nasal function in patients with AR. Therefore, GlyAc could be a reasonable therapeutic option to control allergic inflammation. (www.actabiomedica.it)
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7947735
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Mattioli 1885
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79477352021-03-11 A comparison between mometasone furoate nasal spray and intranasal glycyrrhetic acid in patients with allergic rhinitis: a preliminary study in clinical practice Gariuc, Lucia Sandul, Alexandru Rusu, Daniela Passali, Desiderio Bellussi, Luisa Maria Damiani, Valerio Ciprandi, Giorgio Acta Biomed Original Article Allergic rhinitis (AR) is caused by an IgE-mediated inflammatory reaction consequent to the exposure to the causal allergen. Glycyrrhetic acid (GlyAc) is a natural compound extracted from the liquorice that exerts anti-inflammatory activity. This real-life study compared intranasal GlyAc, present in a medical device containing also glycerol and mannitol, with mometasone furoate nasal spray (MFNS) in 50 adult outpatients with AR. Both treatments lasted 2 months. Endoscopic signs, perception of symptom severity, assessed by VAS, and nasal function measured by rhinomanometry were evaluated at baseline (T0), after one (T1) and two (T2) months. The intergroup analysis showed that at T1 there was no significant difference between groups about the use of decongestants and antihistamines, turbinate hypertrophy and pale mucosa, perception of olfaction and snoring. At T2 there was no significant difference between groups about use of relievers, all endoscopic signs, and perception of nasal discomfort, nasal obstruction, olfaction, and snoring. The intragroup analysis showed that in MFNS group there was a significant change during the entire period of treatment for all parameters except watery rhinorrhea (sign) and ocular discomfort; in GlyAc group there was a significant change during the entire period of treatment for all parameters. In conclusion, this preliminary study, conducted in clinical practice, evidenced that intranasal CysAC plus mannitol was able to significantly improve nasal endoscopic signs, perception of symptoms, and nasal function in patients with AR. Therefore, GlyAc could be a reasonable therapeutic option to control allergic inflammation. (www.actabiomedica.it) Mattioli 1885 2020 2020-02-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7947735/ /pubmed/32073564 http://dx.doi.org/10.23750/abm.v91i1-S.9229 Text en Copyright: © 2020 ACTA BIO MEDICA SOCIETY OF MEDICINE AND NATURAL SCIENCES OF PARMA http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
spellingShingle Original Article
Gariuc, Lucia
Sandul, Alexandru
Rusu, Daniela
Passali, Desiderio
Bellussi, Luisa Maria
Damiani, Valerio
Ciprandi, Giorgio
A comparison between mometasone furoate nasal spray and intranasal glycyrrhetic acid in patients with allergic rhinitis: a preliminary study in clinical practice
title A comparison between mometasone furoate nasal spray and intranasal glycyrrhetic acid in patients with allergic rhinitis: a preliminary study in clinical practice
title_full A comparison between mometasone furoate nasal spray and intranasal glycyrrhetic acid in patients with allergic rhinitis: a preliminary study in clinical practice
title_fullStr A comparison between mometasone furoate nasal spray and intranasal glycyrrhetic acid in patients with allergic rhinitis: a preliminary study in clinical practice
title_full_unstemmed A comparison between mometasone furoate nasal spray and intranasal glycyrrhetic acid in patients with allergic rhinitis: a preliminary study in clinical practice
title_short A comparison between mometasone furoate nasal spray and intranasal glycyrrhetic acid in patients with allergic rhinitis: a preliminary study in clinical practice
title_sort comparison between mometasone furoate nasal spray and intranasal glycyrrhetic acid in patients with allergic rhinitis: a preliminary study in clinical practice
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7947735/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32073564
http://dx.doi.org/10.23750/abm.v91i1-S.9229
work_keys_str_mv AT gariuclucia acomparisonbetweenmometasonefuroatenasalsprayandintranasalglycyrrheticacidinpatientswithallergicrhinitisapreliminarystudyinclinicalpractice
AT sandulalexandru acomparisonbetweenmometasonefuroatenasalsprayandintranasalglycyrrheticacidinpatientswithallergicrhinitisapreliminarystudyinclinicalpractice
AT rusudaniela acomparisonbetweenmometasonefuroatenasalsprayandintranasalglycyrrheticacidinpatientswithallergicrhinitisapreliminarystudyinclinicalpractice
AT passalidesiderio acomparisonbetweenmometasonefuroatenasalsprayandintranasalglycyrrheticacidinpatientswithallergicrhinitisapreliminarystudyinclinicalpractice
AT bellussiluisamaria acomparisonbetweenmometasonefuroatenasalsprayandintranasalglycyrrheticacidinpatientswithallergicrhinitisapreliminarystudyinclinicalpractice
AT damianivalerio acomparisonbetweenmometasonefuroatenasalsprayandintranasalglycyrrheticacidinpatientswithallergicrhinitisapreliminarystudyinclinicalpractice
AT ciprandigiorgio acomparisonbetweenmometasonefuroatenasalsprayandintranasalglycyrrheticacidinpatientswithallergicrhinitisapreliminarystudyinclinicalpractice
AT gariuclucia comparisonbetweenmometasonefuroatenasalsprayandintranasalglycyrrheticacidinpatientswithallergicrhinitisapreliminarystudyinclinicalpractice
AT sandulalexandru comparisonbetweenmometasonefuroatenasalsprayandintranasalglycyrrheticacidinpatientswithallergicrhinitisapreliminarystudyinclinicalpractice
AT rusudaniela comparisonbetweenmometasonefuroatenasalsprayandintranasalglycyrrheticacidinpatientswithallergicrhinitisapreliminarystudyinclinicalpractice
AT passalidesiderio comparisonbetweenmometasonefuroatenasalsprayandintranasalglycyrrheticacidinpatientswithallergicrhinitisapreliminarystudyinclinicalpractice
AT bellussiluisamaria comparisonbetweenmometasonefuroatenasalsprayandintranasalglycyrrheticacidinpatientswithallergicrhinitisapreliminarystudyinclinicalpractice
AT damianivalerio comparisonbetweenmometasonefuroatenasalsprayandintranasalglycyrrheticacidinpatientswithallergicrhinitisapreliminarystudyinclinicalpractice
AT ciprandigiorgio comparisonbetweenmometasonefuroatenasalsprayandintranasalglycyrrheticacidinpatientswithallergicrhinitisapreliminarystudyinclinicalpractice