Cargando…

Contrast-FEL—A Test for Differences in Selective Pressures at Individual Sites among Clades and Sets of Branches

A number of evolutionary hypotheses can be tested by comparing selective pressures among sets of branches in a phylogenetic tree. When the question of interest is to identify specific sites within genes that may be evolving differently, a common approach is to perform separate analyses on subsets of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kosakovsky Pond, Sergei L, Wisotsky, Sadie R, Escalante, Ananias, Magalis, Brittany Rife, Weaver, Steven
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7947784/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33064823
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msaa263
_version_ 1783663299479470080
author Kosakovsky Pond, Sergei L
Wisotsky, Sadie R
Escalante, Ananias
Magalis, Brittany Rife
Weaver, Steven
author_facet Kosakovsky Pond, Sergei L
Wisotsky, Sadie R
Escalante, Ananias
Magalis, Brittany Rife
Weaver, Steven
author_sort Kosakovsky Pond, Sergei L
collection PubMed
description A number of evolutionary hypotheses can be tested by comparing selective pressures among sets of branches in a phylogenetic tree. When the question of interest is to identify specific sites within genes that may be evolving differently, a common approach is to perform separate analyses on subsets of sequences and compare parameter estimates in a post hoc fashion. This approach is statistically suboptimal and not always applicable. Here, we develop a simple extension of a popular fixed effects likelihood method in the context of codon-based evolutionary phylogenetic maximum likelihood testing, Contrast-FEL. It is suitable for identifying individual alignment sites where any among the [Formula: see text] sets of branches in a phylogenetic tree have detectably different ω ratios, indicative of different selective regimes. Using extensive simulations, we show that Contrast-FEL delivers good power, exceeding 90% for sufficiently large differences, while maintaining tight control over false positive rates, when the model is correctly specified. We conclude by applying Contrast-FEL to data from five previously published studies spanning a diverse range of organisms and focusing on different evolutionary questions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7947784
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79477842021-03-16 Contrast-FEL—A Test for Differences in Selective Pressures at Individual Sites among Clades and Sets of Branches Kosakovsky Pond, Sergei L Wisotsky, Sadie R Escalante, Ananias Magalis, Brittany Rife Weaver, Steven Mol Biol Evol Methods A number of evolutionary hypotheses can be tested by comparing selective pressures among sets of branches in a phylogenetic tree. When the question of interest is to identify specific sites within genes that may be evolving differently, a common approach is to perform separate analyses on subsets of sequences and compare parameter estimates in a post hoc fashion. This approach is statistically suboptimal and not always applicable. Here, we develop a simple extension of a popular fixed effects likelihood method in the context of codon-based evolutionary phylogenetic maximum likelihood testing, Contrast-FEL. It is suitable for identifying individual alignment sites where any among the [Formula: see text] sets of branches in a phylogenetic tree have detectably different ω ratios, indicative of different selective regimes. Using extensive simulations, we show that Contrast-FEL delivers good power, exceeding 90% for sufficiently large differences, while maintaining tight control over false positive rates, when the model is correctly specified. We conclude by applying Contrast-FEL to data from five previously published studies spanning a diverse range of organisms and focusing on different evolutionary questions. Oxford University Press 2020-10-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7947784/ /pubmed/33064823 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msaa263 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Methods
Kosakovsky Pond, Sergei L
Wisotsky, Sadie R
Escalante, Ananias
Magalis, Brittany Rife
Weaver, Steven
Contrast-FEL—A Test for Differences in Selective Pressures at Individual Sites among Clades and Sets of Branches
title Contrast-FEL—A Test for Differences in Selective Pressures at Individual Sites among Clades and Sets of Branches
title_full Contrast-FEL—A Test for Differences in Selective Pressures at Individual Sites among Clades and Sets of Branches
title_fullStr Contrast-FEL—A Test for Differences in Selective Pressures at Individual Sites among Clades and Sets of Branches
title_full_unstemmed Contrast-FEL—A Test for Differences in Selective Pressures at Individual Sites among Clades and Sets of Branches
title_short Contrast-FEL—A Test for Differences in Selective Pressures at Individual Sites among Clades and Sets of Branches
title_sort contrast-fel—a test for differences in selective pressures at individual sites among clades and sets of branches
topic Methods
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7947784/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33064823
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msaa263
work_keys_str_mv AT kosakovskypondsergeil contrastfelatestfordifferencesinselectivepressuresatindividualsitesamongcladesandsetsofbranches
AT wisotskysadier contrastfelatestfordifferencesinselectivepressuresatindividualsitesamongcladesandsetsofbranches
AT escalanteananias contrastfelatestfordifferencesinselectivepressuresatindividualsitesamongcladesandsetsofbranches
AT magalisbrittanyrife contrastfelatestfordifferencesinselectivepressuresatindividualsitesamongcladesandsetsofbranches
AT weaversteven contrastfelatestfordifferencesinselectivepressuresatindividualsitesamongcladesandsetsofbranches