Cargando…
Separated at Birth: The Politics of Pharmacare for All in Canada and Medicare for All in the United States Comment on "Universal Pharmacare in Canada"
Policy decisions about healthcare coverage in Canada and the United States in the 1960s placed two virtually identical systems on different evolutionary paths in the physician and hospital sectors. However, prescription drug coverage remained outside Canada’s single-payer model, and employer-based c...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Kerman University of Medical Sciences
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7947896/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32610786 http://dx.doi.org/10.34172/ijhpm.2020.31 |
_version_ | 1783663322952892416 |
---|---|
author | Tuohy, Carolyn Hughes |
author_facet | Tuohy, Carolyn Hughes |
author_sort | Tuohy, Carolyn Hughes |
collection | PubMed |
description | Policy decisions about healthcare coverage in Canada and the United States in the 1960s placed two virtually identical systems on different evolutionary paths in the physician and hospital sectors. However, prescription drug coverage remained outside Canada’s single-payer model, and employer-based coverage continued to be the norm for the workforce population, as is the case across the broad healthcare system in the United States. As a result the current debate about pharmacare in Canada mirrors in political microcosm the larger debate on universal health insurance among American Democrats. In each case the near-term prospects for a single-payer plan appear slim. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7947896 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Kerman University of Medical Sciences |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79478962021-03-16 Separated at Birth: The Politics of Pharmacare for All in Canada and Medicare for All in the United States Comment on "Universal Pharmacare in Canada" Tuohy, Carolyn Hughes Int J Health Policy Manag Commentary Policy decisions about healthcare coverage in Canada and the United States in the 1960s placed two virtually identical systems on different evolutionary paths in the physician and hospital sectors. However, prescription drug coverage remained outside Canada’s single-payer model, and employer-based coverage continued to be the norm for the workforce population, as is the case across the broad healthcare system in the United States. As a result the current debate about pharmacare in Canada mirrors in political microcosm the larger debate on universal health insurance among American Democrats. In each case the near-term prospects for a single-payer plan appear slim. Kerman University of Medical Sciences 2020-03-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7947896/ /pubmed/32610786 http://dx.doi.org/10.34172/ijhpm.2020.31 Text en © 2021 The Author(s); Published by Kerman University of Medical Sciences This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Commentary Tuohy, Carolyn Hughes Separated at Birth: The Politics of Pharmacare for All in Canada and Medicare for All in the United States Comment on "Universal Pharmacare in Canada" |
title | Separated at Birth: The Politics of Pharmacare for All in Canada and Medicare for All in the United States Comment on "Universal Pharmacare in Canada" |
title_full | Separated at Birth: The Politics of Pharmacare for All in Canada and Medicare for All in the United States Comment on "Universal Pharmacare in Canada" |
title_fullStr | Separated at Birth: The Politics of Pharmacare for All in Canada and Medicare for All in the United States Comment on "Universal Pharmacare in Canada" |
title_full_unstemmed | Separated at Birth: The Politics of Pharmacare for All in Canada and Medicare for All in the United States Comment on "Universal Pharmacare in Canada" |
title_short | Separated at Birth: The Politics of Pharmacare for All in Canada and Medicare for All in the United States Comment on "Universal Pharmacare in Canada" |
title_sort | separated at birth: the politics of pharmacare for all in canada and medicare for all in the united states comment on "universal pharmacare in canada" |
topic | Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7947896/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32610786 http://dx.doi.org/10.34172/ijhpm.2020.31 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tuohycarolynhughes separatedatbirththepoliticsofpharmacareforallincanadaandmedicareforallintheunitedstatescommentonuniversalpharmacareincanada |