Cargando…

Reducing COVID-19 risk in schools: a qualitative examination of secondary school staff and family views and concerns in the South West of England

OBJECTIVE: To investigate student, parent/carer and secondary school staff attitudes towards school COVID-19 mitigation measures. METHODS: Recruitment used school communication, community organisations and snowball sampling in South West England. Audio recorded online or phone individual/group semi-...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lorenc, Ava, Kesten, Joanna May, Kidger, Judi, Langford, Rebecca, Horwood, Jeremy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7948157/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34192194
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2020-000987
_version_ 1783663360673316864
author Lorenc, Ava
Kesten, Joanna May
Kidger, Judi
Langford, Rebecca
Horwood, Jeremy
author_facet Lorenc, Ava
Kesten, Joanna May
Kidger, Judi
Langford, Rebecca
Horwood, Jeremy
author_sort Lorenc, Ava
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To investigate student, parent/carer and secondary school staff attitudes towards school COVID-19 mitigation measures. METHODS: Recruitment used school communication, community organisations and snowball sampling in South West England. Audio recorded online or phone individual/group semi-structured interviews were conducted in July–Septtember 2020 and lasted 30–60 min. Interviews focused on views towards social distancing, hand hygiene and testing. Framework analysis was performed on interview notes/transcripts. RESULTS: Participants were 15 staff, 20 parents and 17 students (11–16 years) from 14 diverse schools. Concerns about COVID-19 risk at school, especially to vulnerable individuals, were outweighed by perceived risks of missed learning. Some staff felt guilt around being a potential ‘spreader’ by teaching multiple classes. Findings highlighted a wide variety of school COVID-19 mitigation measures being deployed due to ambiguous government guidance. Participants generally saw mitigation measures as an acceptable and pragmatic solution to the perceived impossibility of social distancing in crowded schools, although anticipated challenges changing habitual behaviour. Participants supported school COVID-19 testing but identified the need to consider data security and stigma around COVID-19 diagnosis. Staff were concerned about unintended consequences of risk-reduction strategies on student behaviour, learning and pastoral care, particularly for those with Special Educational Needs or mental health issues who may find the measures especially challenging, and resultant widening inequalities. CONCLUSION: Families and staff supported COVID-19 mitigation measures in schools and would welcome the roll out school COVID-19 testing. Clear messaging and engendering collective responsibility are important for compliance and success of COVID-19 mitigation measures. However, schools and policy-makers should consider unintended consequences of measures, providing extra support for vulnerable students and those with additional needs, and consider ways to avoid widening educational and health inequalities. Findings demonstrate the acceptability of school COVID-19 infection control measures is likely to be influenced by the balance of risks and benefits to students.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7948157
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79481572021-03-11 Reducing COVID-19 risk in schools: a qualitative examination of secondary school staff and family views and concerns in the South West of England Lorenc, Ava Kesten, Joanna May Kidger, Judi Langford, Rebecca Horwood, Jeremy BMJ Paediatr Open Infectious Diseases OBJECTIVE: To investigate student, parent/carer and secondary school staff attitudes towards school COVID-19 mitigation measures. METHODS: Recruitment used school communication, community organisations and snowball sampling in South West England. Audio recorded online or phone individual/group semi-structured interviews were conducted in July–Septtember 2020 and lasted 30–60 min. Interviews focused on views towards social distancing, hand hygiene and testing. Framework analysis was performed on interview notes/transcripts. RESULTS: Participants were 15 staff, 20 parents and 17 students (11–16 years) from 14 diverse schools. Concerns about COVID-19 risk at school, especially to vulnerable individuals, were outweighed by perceived risks of missed learning. Some staff felt guilt around being a potential ‘spreader’ by teaching multiple classes. Findings highlighted a wide variety of school COVID-19 mitigation measures being deployed due to ambiguous government guidance. Participants generally saw mitigation measures as an acceptable and pragmatic solution to the perceived impossibility of social distancing in crowded schools, although anticipated challenges changing habitual behaviour. Participants supported school COVID-19 testing but identified the need to consider data security and stigma around COVID-19 diagnosis. Staff were concerned about unintended consequences of risk-reduction strategies on student behaviour, learning and pastoral care, particularly for those with Special Educational Needs or mental health issues who may find the measures especially challenging, and resultant widening inequalities. CONCLUSION: Families and staff supported COVID-19 mitigation measures in schools and would welcome the roll out school COVID-19 testing. Clear messaging and engendering collective responsibility are important for compliance and success of COVID-19 mitigation measures. However, schools and policy-makers should consider unintended consequences of measures, providing extra support for vulnerable students and those with additional needs, and consider ways to avoid widening educational and health inequalities. Findings demonstrate the acceptability of school COVID-19 infection control measures is likely to be influenced by the balance of risks and benefits to students. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-03-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7948157/ /pubmed/34192194 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2020-000987 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Infectious Diseases
Lorenc, Ava
Kesten, Joanna May
Kidger, Judi
Langford, Rebecca
Horwood, Jeremy
Reducing COVID-19 risk in schools: a qualitative examination of secondary school staff and family views and concerns in the South West of England
title Reducing COVID-19 risk in schools: a qualitative examination of secondary school staff and family views and concerns in the South West of England
title_full Reducing COVID-19 risk in schools: a qualitative examination of secondary school staff and family views and concerns in the South West of England
title_fullStr Reducing COVID-19 risk in schools: a qualitative examination of secondary school staff and family views and concerns in the South West of England
title_full_unstemmed Reducing COVID-19 risk in schools: a qualitative examination of secondary school staff and family views and concerns in the South West of England
title_short Reducing COVID-19 risk in schools: a qualitative examination of secondary school staff and family views and concerns in the South West of England
title_sort reducing covid-19 risk in schools: a qualitative examination of secondary school staff and family views and concerns in the south west of england
topic Infectious Diseases
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7948157/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34192194
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2020-000987
work_keys_str_mv AT lorencava reducingcovid19riskinschoolsaqualitativeexaminationofsecondaryschoolstaffandfamilyviewsandconcernsinthesouthwestofengland
AT kestenjoannamay reducingcovid19riskinschoolsaqualitativeexaminationofsecondaryschoolstaffandfamilyviewsandconcernsinthesouthwestofengland
AT kidgerjudi reducingcovid19riskinschoolsaqualitativeexaminationofsecondaryschoolstaffandfamilyviewsandconcernsinthesouthwestofengland
AT langfordrebecca reducingcovid19riskinschoolsaqualitativeexaminationofsecondaryschoolstaffandfamilyviewsandconcernsinthesouthwestofengland
AT horwoodjeremy reducingcovid19riskinschoolsaqualitativeexaminationofsecondaryschoolstaffandfamilyviewsandconcernsinthesouthwestofengland