Cargando…

Gut microbiota in two recently diverged passerine species: evaluating the effects of species identity, habitat use and geographic distance

BACKGROUND: It has been proposed that divergence in the gut microbiota composition between incipient species could contribute to their reproductive isolation. Nevertheless, empirical evidence for the role of gut microbiota in speciation is scarce. Moreover, it is still largely unknown to what extent...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sottas, Camille, Schmiedová, Lucie, Kreisinger, Jakub, Albrecht, Tomáš, Reif, Jiří, Osiejuk, Tomasz S., Reifová, Radka
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7948333/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33691625
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12862-021-01773-1
_version_ 1783663386353991680
author Sottas, Camille
Schmiedová, Lucie
Kreisinger, Jakub
Albrecht, Tomáš
Reif, Jiří
Osiejuk, Tomasz S.
Reifová, Radka
author_facet Sottas, Camille
Schmiedová, Lucie
Kreisinger, Jakub
Albrecht, Tomáš
Reif, Jiří
Osiejuk, Tomasz S.
Reifová, Radka
author_sort Sottas, Camille
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: It has been proposed that divergence in the gut microbiota composition between incipient species could contribute to their reproductive isolation. Nevertheless, empirical evidence for the role of gut microbiota in speciation is scarce. Moreover, it is still largely unknown to what extent closely related species in the early stages of speciation differ in their gut microbiota composition, especially in non-mammalian taxa, and which factors drive the divergence. Here we analysed the gut microbiota in two closely related passerine species, the common nightingale (Luscinia megarhynchos) and the thrush nightingale (Luscinia luscinia). The ranges of these two species overlap in a secondary contact zone, where both species occasionally hybridize and where interspecific competition has resulted in habitat use differentiation. RESULTS: We analysed the gut microbiota from the proximal, middle and distal part of the small intestine in both sympatric and allopatric populations of the two nightingale species using sequencing of bacterial 16S rRNA. We found small but significant differences in the microbiota composition among the three gut sections. However, the gut microbiota composition in the two nightingale species did not differ significantly between either sympatric or allopatric populations. Most of the observed variation in the gut microbiota composition was explained by inter-individual differences. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the first attempt to assess the potential role of the gut microbiota in bird speciation. Our results suggest that neither habitat use, nor geographical distance, nor species identity have strong influence on the nightingale gut microbiota composition. This suggests that changes in the gut microbiota composition are unlikely to contribute to reproductive isolation in these passerine birds. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12862-021-01773-1.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7948333
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79483332021-03-11 Gut microbiota in two recently diverged passerine species: evaluating the effects of species identity, habitat use and geographic distance Sottas, Camille Schmiedová, Lucie Kreisinger, Jakub Albrecht, Tomáš Reif, Jiří Osiejuk, Tomasz S. Reifová, Radka BMC Ecol Evol Research Article BACKGROUND: It has been proposed that divergence in the gut microbiota composition between incipient species could contribute to their reproductive isolation. Nevertheless, empirical evidence for the role of gut microbiota in speciation is scarce. Moreover, it is still largely unknown to what extent closely related species in the early stages of speciation differ in their gut microbiota composition, especially in non-mammalian taxa, and which factors drive the divergence. Here we analysed the gut microbiota in two closely related passerine species, the common nightingale (Luscinia megarhynchos) and the thrush nightingale (Luscinia luscinia). The ranges of these two species overlap in a secondary contact zone, where both species occasionally hybridize and where interspecific competition has resulted in habitat use differentiation. RESULTS: We analysed the gut microbiota from the proximal, middle and distal part of the small intestine in both sympatric and allopatric populations of the two nightingale species using sequencing of bacterial 16S rRNA. We found small but significant differences in the microbiota composition among the three gut sections. However, the gut microbiota composition in the two nightingale species did not differ significantly between either sympatric or allopatric populations. Most of the observed variation in the gut microbiota composition was explained by inter-individual differences. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the first attempt to assess the potential role of the gut microbiota in bird speciation. Our results suggest that neither habitat use, nor geographical distance, nor species identity have strong influence on the nightingale gut microbiota composition. This suggests that changes in the gut microbiota composition are unlikely to contribute to reproductive isolation in these passerine birds. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12862-021-01773-1. BioMed Central 2021-03-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7948333/ /pubmed/33691625 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12862-021-01773-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Sottas, Camille
Schmiedová, Lucie
Kreisinger, Jakub
Albrecht, Tomáš
Reif, Jiří
Osiejuk, Tomasz S.
Reifová, Radka
Gut microbiota in two recently diverged passerine species: evaluating the effects of species identity, habitat use and geographic distance
title Gut microbiota in two recently diverged passerine species: evaluating the effects of species identity, habitat use and geographic distance
title_full Gut microbiota in two recently diverged passerine species: evaluating the effects of species identity, habitat use and geographic distance
title_fullStr Gut microbiota in two recently diverged passerine species: evaluating the effects of species identity, habitat use and geographic distance
title_full_unstemmed Gut microbiota in two recently diverged passerine species: evaluating the effects of species identity, habitat use and geographic distance
title_short Gut microbiota in two recently diverged passerine species: evaluating the effects of species identity, habitat use and geographic distance
title_sort gut microbiota in two recently diverged passerine species: evaluating the effects of species identity, habitat use and geographic distance
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7948333/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33691625
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12862-021-01773-1
work_keys_str_mv AT sottascamille gutmicrobiotaintworecentlydivergedpasserinespeciesevaluatingtheeffectsofspeciesidentityhabitatuseandgeographicdistance
AT schmiedovalucie gutmicrobiotaintworecentlydivergedpasserinespeciesevaluatingtheeffectsofspeciesidentityhabitatuseandgeographicdistance
AT kreisingerjakub gutmicrobiotaintworecentlydivergedpasserinespeciesevaluatingtheeffectsofspeciesidentityhabitatuseandgeographicdistance
AT albrechttomas gutmicrobiotaintworecentlydivergedpasserinespeciesevaluatingtheeffectsofspeciesidentityhabitatuseandgeographicdistance
AT reifjiri gutmicrobiotaintworecentlydivergedpasserinespeciesevaluatingtheeffectsofspeciesidentityhabitatuseandgeographicdistance
AT osiejuktomaszs gutmicrobiotaintworecentlydivergedpasserinespeciesevaluatingtheeffectsofspeciesidentityhabitatuseandgeographicdistance
AT reifovaradka gutmicrobiotaintworecentlydivergedpasserinespeciesevaluatingtheeffectsofspeciesidentityhabitatuseandgeographicdistance