Cargando…
Is the public supportive and willing to pay for a national assistive reproductive therapies programme? Results from a multicountry survey
OBJECTIVES: To understand attitudes towards infertility and willingness to pay (WTP) towards a publicly funded national assistive reproductive therapies (ART) programme. DESIGN: Attitudes survey with dichotomous and open-ended WTP questions. SETTING: Online survey administered in the USA, UK, Spain,...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7949370/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33692187 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044986 |
_version_ | 1783663511443865600 |
---|---|
author | Skedgel, Chris Ralphs, Eleanor Finn, Elaine Whitty, Jennifer A Markert, Marie Samuelsen, Carl |
author_facet | Skedgel, Chris Ralphs, Eleanor Finn, Elaine Whitty, Jennifer A Markert, Marie Samuelsen, Carl |
author_sort | Skedgel, Chris |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To understand attitudes towards infertility and willingness to pay (WTP) towards a publicly funded national assistive reproductive therapies (ART) programme. DESIGN: Attitudes survey with dichotomous and open-ended WTP questions. SETTING: Online survey administered in the USA, UK, Spain, Norway, Sweden, Finland, Denmark and China. PARTICIPANTS: 7945 respondents, analysed by country. Nordic respondents were pooled into a regionally representative sample. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome measures were proportion of sample agreeing with different infertility-related and ART-related value statements and supporting a monthly contribution to fund a national ART programme, expressed in local currency. Secondary outcome measure was maximum WTP. RESULTS: Across the nationally representative samples, 75.5% of all respondents agreed with infertility as a medical condition and 82.3% and 83.7% with ART eligibility for anyone who has difficulty having a baby or a medical problem preventing them from having a baby, respectively. 56.4% of respondents supported a defined monthly contribution and 73.9% supported at least some additional contribution to fund a national ART programme. Overall, converting to euros, median maximum WTP was €3.00 and mean was €15.47 (95% CI 14.23 to 16.72) per month. Maximum WTP was highest in China and the USA and lowest in the European samples. CONCLUSIONS: This large, multicountry survey extends our understanding of public attitudes towards infertility and fertility treatment beyond Europe. It finds evidence that a majority of the public in all sampled countries/regions views infertility as a treatable medical condition and supports the idea that all infertile individuals should have access to treatments that improve the chance of conception. There was also strong agreement with the idea that the desire for children is a basic human need. WTP questions showed that a majority of respondents supported a monthly contribution to fund a national ART programme, although there is some evidence of an acquiescence bias that may overstate support among specific samples. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7949370 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79493702021-03-28 Is the public supportive and willing to pay for a national assistive reproductive therapies programme? Results from a multicountry survey Skedgel, Chris Ralphs, Eleanor Finn, Elaine Whitty, Jennifer A Markert, Marie Samuelsen, Carl BMJ Open Reproductive Medicine OBJECTIVES: To understand attitudes towards infertility and willingness to pay (WTP) towards a publicly funded national assistive reproductive therapies (ART) programme. DESIGN: Attitudes survey with dichotomous and open-ended WTP questions. SETTING: Online survey administered in the USA, UK, Spain, Norway, Sweden, Finland, Denmark and China. PARTICIPANTS: 7945 respondents, analysed by country. Nordic respondents were pooled into a regionally representative sample. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome measures were proportion of sample agreeing with different infertility-related and ART-related value statements and supporting a monthly contribution to fund a national ART programme, expressed in local currency. Secondary outcome measure was maximum WTP. RESULTS: Across the nationally representative samples, 75.5% of all respondents agreed with infertility as a medical condition and 82.3% and 83.7% with ART eligibility for anyone who has difficulty having a baby or a medical problem preventing them from having a baby, respectively. 56.4% of respondents supported a defined monthly contribution and 73.9% supported at least some additional contribution to fund a national ART programme. Overall, converting to euros, median maximum WTP was €3.00 and mean was €15.47 (95% CI 14.23 to 16.72) per month. Maximum WTP was highest in China and the USA and lowest in the European samples. CONCLUSIONS: This large, multicountry survey extends our understanding of public attitudes towards infertility and fertility treatment beyond Europe. It finds evidence that a majority of the public in all sampled countries/regions views infertility as a treatable medical condition and supports the idea that all infertile individuals should have access to treatments that improve the chance of conception. There was also strong agreement with the idea that the desire for children is a basic human need. WTP questions showed that a majority of respondents supported a monthly contribution to fund a national ART programme, although there is some evidence of an acquiescence bias that may overstate support among specific samples. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-03-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7949370/ /pubmed/33692187 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044986 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Reproductive Medicine Skedgel, Chris Ralphs, Eleanor Finn, Elaine Whitty, Jennifer A Markert, Marie Samuelsen, Carl Is the public supportive and willing to pay for a national assistive reproductive therapies programme? Results from a multicountry survey |
title | Is the public supportive and willing to pay for a national assistive reproductive therapies programme? Results from a multicountry survey |
title_full | Is the public supportive and willing to pay for a national assistive reproductive therapies programme? Results from a multicountry survey |
title_fullStr | Is the public supportive and willing to pay for a national assistive reproductive therapies programme? Results from a multicountry survey |
title_full_unstemmed | Is the public supportive and willing to pay for a national assistive reproductive therapies programme? Results from a multicountry survey |
title_short | Is the public supportive and willing to pay for a national assistive reproductive therapies programme? Results from a multicountry survey |
title_sort | is the public supportive and willing to pay for a national assistive reproductive therapies programme? results from a multicountry survey |
topic | Reproductive Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7949370/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33692187 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044986 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT skedgelchris isthepublicsupportiveandwillingtopayforanationalassistivereproductivetherapiesprogrammeresultsfromamulticountrysurvey AT ralphseleanor isthepublicsupportiveandwillingtopayforanationalassistivereproductivetherapiesprogrammeresultsfromamulticountrysurvey AT finnelaine isthepublicsupportiveandwillingtopayforanationalassistivereproductivetherapiesprogrammeresultsfromamulticountrysurvey AT whittyjennifera isthepublicsupportiveandwillingtopayforanationalassistivereproductivetherapiesprogrammeresultsfromamulticountrysurvey AT markertmarie isthepublicsupportiveandwillingtopayforanationalassistivereproductivetherapiesprogrammeresultsfromamulticountrysurvey AT samuelsencarl isthepublicsupportiveandwillingtopayforanationalassistivereproductivetherapiesprogrammeresultsfromamulticountrysurvey |