Cargando…

ROP screening and treatment in four district-level special newborn care units in India: a cross-sectional study of screening and treatment rates

OBJECTIVE: Blindness from retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) in middle-income countries is generally due to absence of screening or inadequate screening. The objective of this study was to assess uptake of services in an ROP programme in four district-level special newborn care units in India. DESIGN:...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sabherwal, Shalinder, Gilbert, Clare, Foster, Allen, Kumar, Praveen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7949437/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33782655
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2020-000930
_version_ 1783663514700742656
author Sabherwal, Shalinder
Gilbert, Clare
Foster, Allen
Kumar, Praveen
author_facet Sabherwal, Shalinder
Gilbert, Clare
Foster, Allen
Kumar, Praveen
author_sort Sabherwal, Shalinder
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Blindness from retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) in middle-income countries is generally due to absence of screening or inadequate screening. The objective of this study was to assess uptake of services in an ROP programme in four district-level special newborn care units in India. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: All four neonatal units of a state in India where model programme for ROP had been introduced PATIENTS: Infants eligible for screening and treatment of ROP between March and May 2017. INTERVENTION: Data on sex, birth weight and gestational age of eligible infants were collected and medical records reviewed for follow-up. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Proportion of eligible infants screened and for those screened, age at first screening, completion of screening, diagnosis and treatment received if indicated. The characteristics of infants screened and not screened were compared. RESULTS: 137 (18%) of the 751 infants eligible for screening were screened at least once, with no statistically significant difference by sex. The mean birth weight and gestational age of those screened were significantly lower than those not screened. Among those screened, 43% underwent first screening later than recommended and 44% had incomplete follow-up. Fourteen infants (11% of those screened) were diagnosed with ROP. Five were advised laser treatment and all complied. CONCLUSION: Uptake, completion and timing of first screening was suboptimal. Some planned interventions including training of nursing staff, use of integrated data-management software and providing material for parent counselling, which have been initiated, need to be fully implemented to improve uptake of ROP screening services.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7949437
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79494372021-03-28 ROP screening and treatment in four district-level special newborn care units in India: a cross-sectional study of screening and treatment rates Sabherwal, Shalinder Gilbert, Clare Foster, Allen Kumar, Praveen BMJ Paediatr Open Ophthalmology OBJECTIVE: Blindness from retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) in middle-income countries is generally due to absence of screening or inadequate screening. The objective of this study was to assess uptake of services in an ROP programme in four district-level special newborn care units in India. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: All four neonatal units of a state in India where model programme for ROP had been introduced PATIENTS: Infants eligible for screening and treatment of ROP between March and May 2017. INTERVENTION: Data on sex, birth weight and gestational age of eligible infants were collected and medical records reviewed for follow-up. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Proportion of eligible infants screened and for those screened, age at first screening, completion of screening, diagnosis and treatment received if indicated. The characteristics of infants screened and not screened were compared. RESULTS: 137 (18%) of the 751 infants eligible for screening were screened at least once, with no statistically significant difference by sex. The mean birth weight and gestational age of those screened were significantly lower than those not screened. Among those screened, 43% underwent first screening later than recommended and 44% had incomplete follow-up. Fourteen infants (11% of those screened) were diagnosed with ROP. Five were advised laser treatment and all complied. CONCLUSION: Uptake, completion and timing of first screening was suboptimal. Some planned interventions including training of nursing staff, use of integrated data-management software and providing material for parent counselling, which have been initiated, need to be fully implemented to improve uptake of ROP screening services. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-03-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7949437/ /pubmed/33782655 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2020-000930 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Ophthalmology
Sabherwal, Shalinder
Gilbert, Clare
Foster, Allen
Kumar, Praveen
ROP screening and treatment in four district-level special newborn care units in India: a cross-sectional study of screening and treatment rates
title ROP screening and treatment in four district-level special newborn care units in India: a cross-sectional study of screening and treatment rates
title_full ROP screening and treatment in four district-level special newborn care units in India: a cross-sectional study of screening and treatment rates
title_fullStr ROP screening and treatment in four district-level special newborn care units in India: a cross-sectional study of screening and treatment rates
title_full_unstemmed ROP screening and treatment in four district-level special newborn care units in India: a cross-sectional study of screening and treatment rates
title_short ROP screening and treatment in four district-level special newborn care units in India: a cross-sectional study of screening and treatment rates
title_sort rop screening and treatment in four district-level special newborn care units in india: a cross-sectional study of screening and treatment rates
topic Ophthalmology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7949437/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33782655
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2020-000930
work_keys_str_mv AT sabherwalshalinder ropscreeningandtreatmentinfourdistrictlevelspecialnewborncareunitsinindiaacrosssectionalstudyofscreeningandtreatmentrates
AT gilbertclare ropscreeningandtreatmentinfourdistrictlevelspecialnewborncareunitsinindiaacrosssectionalstudyofscreeningandtreatmentrates
AT fosterallen ropscreeningandtreatmentinfourdistrictlevelspecialnewborncareunitsinindiaacrosssectionalstudyofscreeningandtreatmentrates
AT kumarpraveen ropscreeningandtreatmentinfourdistrictlevelspecialnewborncareunitsinindiaacrosssectionalstudyofscreeningandtreatmentrates