Cargando…

A prospective, randomised, controlled, multicentre clinical trial examining healing rates, safety and cost to closure of an acellular reticular allogenic human dermis versus standard of care in the treatment of chronic diabetic foot ulcers

Acellular dermal matrices can successfully heal wounds. This study's goal was to compare clinical outcomes of a novel, open‐structure human reticular acellular dermis matrix (HR‐ADM) to facilitate wound closure in non‐healing diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) versus DFUs treated with standard of care...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zelen, Charles M, Orgill, Dennis P, Serena, Thomas, Galiano, Robert, Carter, Marissa J, DiDomenico, Lawrence A, Keller, Jennifer, Kaufman, Jarrod, Li, William W
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7949710/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27073000
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.12600
_version_ 1783663524293115904
author Zelen, Charles M
Orgill, Dennis P
Serena, Thomas
Galiano, Robert
Carter, Marissa J
DiDomenico, Lawrence A
Keller, Jennifer
Kaufman, Jarrod
Li, William W
author_facet Zelen, Charles M
Orgill, Dennis P
Serena, Thomas
Galiano, Robert
Carter, Marissa J
DiDomenico, Lawrence A
Keller, Jennifer
Kaufman, Jarrod
Li, William W
author_sort Zelen, Charles M
collection PubMed
description Acellular dermal matrices can successfully heal wounds. This study's goal was to compare clinical outcomes of a novel, open‐structure human reticular acellular dermis matrix (HR‐ADM) to facilitate wound closure in non‐healing diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) versus DFUs treated with standard of care (SOC). Following a 2‐week screening period in which DFUs were treated with offloading and moist wound care, patients were randomised to either SOC alone or HR‐ADM plus SOC applied weekly for up to 12 weeks. At 6 weeks, the primary outcome time, 65% of the HR‐ADM‐treated DFUs healed (13/20) compared with 5% (1/20) of DFUs that received SOC alone. At 12 weeks, the proportions of DFUs healed were 80% and 20%, respectively. Mean time to heal within 12 weeks was 40 days for the HR‐ADM group compared with 77 days for the SOC group. There was no incidence of increased adverse or serious adverse events between groups or any adverse events related to the graft. Mean and median graft costs to closure per healed wound in the HR‐ADM group were $1475 and $963, respectively. Weekly application of HR‐ADM is an effective intervention for promoting closure of non‐healing DFUs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7949710
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79497102021-07-02 A prospective, randomised, controlled, multicentre clinical trial examining healing rates, safety and cost to closure of an acellular reticular allogenic human dermis versus standard of care in the treatment of chronic diabetic foot ulcers Zelen, Charles M Orgill, Dennis P Serena, Thomas Galiano, Robert Carter, Marissa J DiDomenico, Lawrence A Keller, Jennifer Kaufman, Jarrod Li, William W Int Wound J Original Articles Acellular dermal matrices can successfully heal wounds. This study's goal was to compare clinical outcomes of a novel, open‐structure human reticular acellular dermis matrix (HR‐ADM) to facilitate wound closure in non‐healing diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) versus DFUs treated with standard of care (SOC). Following a 2‐week screening period in which DFUs were treated with offloading and moist wound care, patients were randomised to either SOC alone or HR‐ADM plus SOC applied weekly for up to 12 weeks. At 6 weeks, the primary outcome time, 65% of the HR‐ADM‐treated DFUs healed (13/20) compared with 5% (1/20) of DFUs that received SOC alone. At 12 weeks, the proportions of DFUs healed were 80% and 20%, respectively. Mean time to heal within 12 weeks was 40 days for the HR‐ADM group compared with 77 days for the SOC group. There was no incidence of increased adverse or serious adverse events between groups or any adverse events related to the graft. Mean and median graft costs to closure per healed wound in the HR‐ADM group were $1475 and $963, respectively. Weekly application of HR‐ADM is an effective intervention for promoting closure of non‐healing DFUs. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2016-04-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7949710/ /pubmed/27073000 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.12600 Text en © 2016 The Authors. International Wound Journal published by Medicalhelplines.com Inc and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Zelen, Charles M
Orgill, Dennis P
Serena, Thomas
Galiano, Robert
Carter, Marissa J
DiDomenico, Lawrence A
Keller, Jennifer
Kaufman, Jarrod
Li, William W
A prospective, randomised, controlled, multicentre clinical trial examining healing rates, safety and cost to closure of an acellular reticular allogenic human dermis versus standard of care in the treatment of chronic diabetic foot ulcers
title A prospective, randomised, controlled, multicentre clinical trial examining healing rates, safety and cost to closure of an acellular reticular allogenic human dermis versus standard of care in the treatment of chronic diabetic foot ulcers
title_full A prospective, randomised, controlled, multicentre clinical trial examining healing rates, safety and cost to closure of an acellular reticular allogenic human dermis versus standard of care in the treatment of chronic diabetic foot ulcers
title_fullStr A prospective, randomised, controlled, multicentre clinical trial examining healing rates, safety and cost to closure of an acellular reticular allogenic human dermis versus standard of care in the treatment of chronic diabetic foot ulcers
title_full_unstemmed A prospective, randomised, controlled, multicentre clinical trial examining healing rates, safety and cost to closure of an acellular reticular allogenic human dermis versus standard of care in the treatment of chronic diabetic foot ulcers
title_short A prospective, randomised, controlled, multicentre clinical trial examining healing rates, safety and cost to closure of an acellular reticular allogenic human dermis versus standard of care in the treatment of chronic diabetic foot ulcers
title_sort prospective, randomised, controlled, multicentre clinical trial examining healing rates, safety and cost to closure of an acellular reticular allogenic human dermis versus standard of care in the treatment of chronic diabetic foot ulcers
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7949710/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27073000
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.12600
work_keys_str_mv AT zelencharlesm aprospectiverandomisedcontrolledmulticentreclinicaltrialexamininghealingratessafetyandcosttoclosureofanacellularreticularallogenichumandermisversusstandardofcareinthetreatmentofchronicdiabeticfootulcers
AT orgilldennisp aprospectiverandomisedcontrolledmulticentreclinicaltrialexamininghealingratessafetyandcosttoclosureofanacellularreticularallogenichumandermisversusstandardofcareinthetreatmentofchronicdiabeticfootulcers
AT serenathomas aprospectiverandomisedcontrolledmulticentreclinicaltrialexamininghealingratessafetyandcosttoclosureofanacellularreticularallogenichumandermisversusstandardofcareinthetreatmentofchronicdiabeticfootulcers
AT galianorobert aprospectiverandomisedcontrolledmulticentreclinicaltrialexamininghealingratessafetyandcosttoclosureofanacellularreticularallogenichumandermisversusstandardofcareinthetreatmentofchronicdiabeticfootulcers
AT cartermarissaj aprospectiverandomisedcontrolledmulticentreclinicaltrialexamininghealingratessafetyandcosttoclosureofanacellularreticularallogenichumandermisversusstandardofcareinthetreatmentofchronicdiabeticfootulcers
AT didomenicolawrencea aprospectiverandomisedcontrolledmulticentreclinicaltrialexamininghealingratessafetyandcosttoclosureofanacellularreticularallogenichumandermisversusstandardofcareinthetreatmentofchronicdiabeticfootulcers
AT kellerjennifer aprospectiverandomisedcontrolledmulticentreclinicaltrialexamininghealingratessafetyandcosttoclosureofanacellularreticularallogenichumandermisversusstandardofcareinthetreatmentofchronicdiabeticfootulcers
AT kaufmanjarrod aprospectiverandomisedcontrolledmulticentreclinicaltrialexamininghealingratessafetyandcosttoclosureofanacellularreticularallogenichumandermisversusstandardofcareinthetreatmentofchronicdiabeticfootulcers
AT liwilliamw aprospectiverandomisedcontrolledmulticentreclinicaltrialexamininghealingratessafetyandcosttoclosureofanacellularreticularallogenichumandermisversusstandardofcareinthetreatmentofchronicdiabeticfootulcers
AT zelencharlesm prospectiverandomisedcontrolledmulticentreclinicaltrialexamininghealingratessafetyandcosttoclosureofanacellularreticularallogenichumandermisversusstandardofcareinthetreatmentofchronicdiabeticfootulcers
AT orgilldennisp prospectiverandomisedcontrolledmulticentreclinicaltrialexamininghealingratessafetyandcosttoclosureofanacellularreticularallogenichumandermisversusstandardofcareinthetreatmentofchronicdiabeticfootulcers
AT serenathomas prospectiverandomisedcontrolledmulticentreclinicaltrialexamininghealingratessafetyandcosttoclosureofanacellularreticularallogenichumandermisversusstandardofcareinthetreatmentofchronicdiabeticfootulcers
AT galianorobert prospectiverandomisedcontrolledmulticentreclinicaltrialexamininghealingratessafetyandcosttoclosureofanacellularreticularallogenichumandermisversusstandardofcareinthetreatmentofchronicdiabeticfootulcers
AT cartermarissaj prospectiverandomisedcontrolledmulticentreclinicaltrialexamininghealingratessafetyandcosttoclosureofanacellularreticularallogenichumandermisversusstandardofcareinthetreatmentofchronicdiabeticfootulcers
AT didomenicolawrencea prospectiverandomisedcontrolledmulticentreclinicaltrialexamininghealingratessafetyandcosttoclosureofanacellularreticularallogenichumandermisversusstandardofcareinthetreatmentofchronicdiabeticfootulcers
AT kellerjennifer prospectiverandomisedcontrolledmulticentreclinicaltrialexamininghealingratessafetyandcosttoclosureofanacellularreticularallogenichumandermisversusstandardofcareinthetreatmentofchronicdiabeticfootulcers
AT kaufmanjarrod prospectiverandomisedcontrolledmulticentreclinicaltrialexamininghealingratessafetyandcosttoclosureofanacellularreticularallogenichumandermisversusstandardofcareinthetreatmentofchronicdiabeticfootulcers
AT liwilliamw prospectiverandomisedcontrolledmulticentreclinicaltrialexamininghealingratessafetyandcosttoclosureofanacellularreticularallogenichumandermisversusstandardofcareinthetreatmentofchronicdiabeticfootulcers