Cargando…

Predicting Brain Age at Slice Level: Convolutional Neural Networks and Consequences for Interpretability

Problem: Chronological aging in later life is associated with brain degeneration processes and increased risk for disease such as stroke and dementia. With a worldwide tendency of aging populations and increased longevity, mental health, and psychiatric research have paid increasing attention to und...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ballester, Pedro L., da Silva, Laura Tomaz, Marcon, Matheus, Esper, Nathalia Bianchini, Frey, Benicio N., Buchweitz, Augusto, Meneguzzi, Felipe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7949912/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33716814
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.598518
_version_ 1783663528531460096
author Ballester, Pedro L.
da Silva, Laura Tomaz
Marcon, Matheus
Esper, Nathalia Bianchini
Frey, Benicio N.
Buchweitz, Augusto
Meneguzzi, Felipe
author_facet Ballester, Pedro L.
da Silva, Laura Tomaz
Marcon, Matheus
Esper, Nathalia Bianchini
Frey, Benicio N.
Buchweitz, Augusto
Meneguzzi, Felipe
author_sort Ballester, Pedro L.
collection PubMed
description Problem: Chronological aging in later life is associated with brain degeneration processes and increased risk for disease such as stroke and dementia. With a worldwide tendency of aging populations and increased longevity, mental health, and psychiatric research have paid increasing attention to understanding brain-related changes of aging. Recent findings suggest there is a brain age gap (a difference between chronological age and brain age predicted by brain imaging indices); the magnitude of the gap may indicate early onset of brain aging processes and disease. Artificial intelligence has allowed for a narrowing of the gap in chronological and predicted brain age. However, the factors that drive model predictions of brain age are still unknown, and there is not much about these factors that can be gleaned from the black-box nature of machine learning models. The goal of the present study was to test a brain age regression approach that is more amenable to interpretation by researchers and clinicians. Methods: Using convolutional neural networks we trained multiple regressor models to predict brain age based on single slices of magnetic resonance imaging, which included gray matter- or white matter-segmented inputs. We evaluated the trained models in all brain image slices to generate a final prediction of brain age. Unlike whole-brain approaches to classification, the slice-level predictions allows for the identification of which brain slices and associated regions have the largest difference between chronological and neuroimaging-derived brain age. We also evaluated how model predictions were influenced by slice index and plane, participant age and sex, and MRI data collection site. Results: The results show, first, that the specific slice used for prediction affects prediction error (i.e., difference between chronological age and neuroimaging-derived brain age); second, the MRI site-stratified separation of training and test sets removed site effects and also minimized sex effects; third, the choice of MRI slice plane influences the overall error of the model. Conclusion: Compared to whole brain-based predictive models of neuroimaging-derived brain age, slice-based approach improves the interpretability and therefore the reliability of the prediction of brain age using MRI data.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7949912
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79499122021-03-12 Predicting Brain Age at Slice Level: Convolutional Neural Networks and Consequences for Interpretability Ballester, Pedro L. da Silva, Laura Tomaz Marcon, Matheus Esper, Nathalia Bianchini Frey, Benicio N. Buchweitz, Augusto Meneguzzi, Felipe Front Psychiatry Psychiatry Problem: Chronological aging in later life is associated with brain degeneration processes and increased risk for disease such as stroke and dementia. With a worldwide tendency of aging populations and increased longevity, mental health, and psychiatric research have paid increasing attention to understanding brain-related changes of aging. Recent findings suggest there is a brain age gap (a difference between chronological age and brain age predicted by brain imaging indices); the magnitude of the gap may indicate early onset of brain aging processes and disease. Artificial intelligence has allowed for a narrowing of the gap in chronological and predicted brain age. However, the factors that drive model predictions of brain age are still unknown, and there is not much about these factors that can be gleaned from the black-box nature of machine learning models. The goal of the present study was to test a brain age regression approach that is more amenable to interpretation by researchers and clinicians. Methods: Using convolutional neural networks we trained multiple regressor models to predict brain age based on single slices of magnetic resonance imaging, which included gray matter- or white matter-segmented inputs. We evaluated the trained models in all brain image slices to generate a final prediction of brain age. Unlike whole-brain approaches to classification, the slice-level predictions allows for the identification of which brain slices and associated regions have the largest difference between chronological and neuroimaging-derived brain age. We also evaluated how model predictions were influenced by slice index and plane, participant age and sex, and MRI data collection site. Results: The results show, first, that the specific slice used for prediction affects prediction error (i.e., difference between chronological age and neuroimaging-derived brain age); second, the MRI site-stratified separation of training and test sets removed site effects and also minimized sex effects; third, the choice of MRI slice plane influences the overall error of the model. Conclusion: Compared to whole brain-based predictive models of neuroimaging-derived brain age, slice-based approach improves the interpretability and therefore the reliability of the prediction of brain age using MRI data. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-02-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7949912/ /pubmed/33716814 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.598518 Text en Copyright © 2021 Ballester, da Silva, Marcon, Esper, Frey, Buchweitz and Meneguzzi. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychiatry
Ballester, Pedro L.
da Silva, Laura Tomaz
Marcon, Matheus
Esper, Nathalia Bianchini
Frey, Benicio N.
Buchweitz, Augusto
Meneguzzi, Felipe
Predicting Brain Age at Slice Level: Convolutional Neural Networks and Consequences for Interpretability
title Predicting Brain Age at Slice Level: Convolutional Neural Networks and Consequences for Interpretability
title_full Predicting Brain Age at Slice Level: Convolutional Neural Networks and Consequences for Interpretability
title_fullStr Predicting Brain Age at Slice Level: Convolutional Neural Networks and Consequences for Interpretability
title_full_unstemmed Predicting Brain Age at Slice Level: Convolutional Neural Networks and Consequences for Interpretability
title_short Predicting Brain Age at Slice Level: Convolutional Neural Networks and Consequences for Interpretability
title_sort predicting brain age at slice level: convolutional neural networks and consequences for interpretability
topic Psychiatry
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7949912/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33716814
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.598518
work_keys_str_mv AT ballesterpedrol predictingbrainageatslicelevelconvolutionalneuralnetworksandconsequencesforinterpretability
AT dasilvalauratomaz predictingbrainageatslicelevelconvolutionalneuralnetworksandconsequencesforinterpretability
AT marconmatheus predictingbrainageatslicelevelconvolutionalneuralnetworksandconsequencesforinterpretability
AT espernathaliabianchini predictingbrainageatslicelevelconvolutionalneuralnetworksandconsequencesforinterpretability
AT freybenicion predictingbrainageatslicelevelconvolutionalneuralnetworksandconsequencesforinterpretability
AT buchweitzaugusto predictingbrainageatslicelevelconvolutionalneuralnetworksandconsequencesforinterpretability
AT meneguzzifelipe predictingbrainageatslicelevelconvolutionalneuralnetworksandconsequencesforinterpretability