Cargando…

An explorative study on the validity of various definitions of a 2·2°C temperature threshold as warning signal for impending diabetic foot ulceration

Home monitoring of skin temperature is effective to prevent diabetic foot ulceration. We explored the validity of various definitions for the >2·2°C left‐to‐right threshold used as a warning signal for impending ulceration. Twenty patients with diabetes and peripheral neuropathy monitored their s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wijlens, Anke M, Holloway, Samantha, Bus, Sicco A, van Netten, Jaap J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7949930/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28990362
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.12811
_version_ 1783663529231908864
author Wijlens, Anke M
Holloway, Samantha
Bus, Sicco A
van Netten, Jaap J
author_facet Wijlens, Anke M
Holloway, Samantha
Bus, Sicco A
van Netten, Jaap J
author_sort Wijlens, Anke M
collection PubMed
description Home monitoring of skin temperature is effective to prevent diabetic foot ulceration. We explored the validity of various definitions for the >2·2°C left‐to‐right threshold used as a warning signal for impending ulceration. Twenty patients with diabetes and peripheral neuropathy monitored their skin temperature with an infrared thermometer at the plantar hallux, metatarsal heads, midfoot and heel four times a day for 6 consecutive days. Environmental temperature and walking activity were monitored and associated with foot temperature. The average temperature difference between feet was 0·65°C. At single locations, a left‐to‐right temperature difference of >2·2°C was found 245 times (8·5% of measurements). Confirmation of these above‐threshold readings on the following day was found seven times (0·3%). Corrected for individual left‐to‐right mean foot temperature differences, this reduced to four (0·2%). No ulcers developed in the week after monitoring. Left‐to‐right foot temperature differences were not significantly correlated with walking activity, environmental temperature or time of day. The >2·2°C left‐to‐right foot temperature threshold for impending ulceration is not valid as single measurement, but validity improves to acceptable levels when an above‐threshold temperature difference is confirmed the following day and further improves with individual correction. The threshold is independent of time of day, environmental temperature and walking activity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7949930
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79499302021-07-02 An explorative study on the validity of various definitions of a 2·2°C temperature threshold as warning signal for impending diabetic foot ulceration Wijlens, Anke M Holloway, Samantha Bus, Sicco A van Netten, Jaap J Int Wound J Original Articles Home monitoring of skin temperature is effective to prevent diabetic foot ulceration. We explored the validity of various definitions for the >2·2°C left‐to‐right threshold used as a warning signal for impending ulceration. Twenty patients with diabetes and peripheral neuropathy monitored their skin temperature with an infrared thermometer at the plantar hallux, metatarsal heads, midfoot and heel four times a day for 6 consecutive days. Environmental temperature and walking activity were monitored and associated with foot temperature. The average temperature difference between feet was 0·65°C. At single locations, a left‐to‐right temperature difference of >2·2°C was found 245 times (8·5% of measurements). Confirmation of these above‐threshold readings on the following day was found seven times (0·3%). Corrected for individual left‐to‐right mean foot temperature differences, this reduced to four (0·2%). No ulcers developed in the week after monitoring. Left‐to‐right foot temperature differences were not significantly correlated with walking activity, environmental temperature or time of day. The >2·2°C left‐to‐right foot temperature threshold for impending ulceration is not valid as single measurement, but validity improves to acceptable levels when an above‐threshold temperature difference is confirmed the following day and further improves with individual correction. The threshold is independent of time of day, environmental temperature and walking activity. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2017-10-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7949930/ /pubmed/28990362 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.12811 Text en © 2017 The Authors. International Wound Journal published by Medicalhelplines.com Inc and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Wijlens, Anke M
Holloway, Samantha
Bus, Sicco A
van Netten, Jaap J
An explorative study on the validity of various definitions of a 2·2°C temperature threshold as warning signal for impending diabetic foot ulceration
title An explorative study on the validity of various definitions of a 2·2°C temperature threshold as warning signal for impending diabetic foot ulceration
title_full An explorative study on the validity of various definitions of a 2·2°C temperature threshold as warning signal for impending diabetic foot ulceration
title_fullStr An explorative study on the validity of various definitions of a 2·2°C temperature threshold as warning signal for impending diabetic foot ulceration
title_full_unstemmed An explorative study on the validity of various definitions of a 2·2°C temperature threshold as warning signal for impending diabetic foot ulceration
title_short An explorative study on the validity of various definitions of a 2·2°C temperature threshold as warning signal for impending diabetic foot ulceration
title_sort explorative study on the validity of various definitions of a 2·2°c temperature threshold as warning signal for impending diabetic foot ulceration
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7949930/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28990362
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.12811
work_keys_str_mv AT wijlensankem anexplorativestudyonthevalidityofvariousdefinitionsofa22ctemperaturethresholdaswarningsignalforimpendingdiabeticfootulceration
AT hollowaysamantha anexplorativestudyonthevalidityofvariousdefinitionsofa22ctemperaturethresholdaswarningsignalforimpendingdiabeticfootulceration
AT bussiccoa anexplorativestudyonthevalidityofvariousdefinitionsofa22ctemperaturethresholdaswarningsignalforimpendingdiabeticfootulceration
AT vannettenjaapj anexplorativestudyonthevalidityofvariousdefinitionsofa22ctemperaturethresholdaswarningsignalforimpendingdiabeticfootulceration
AT wijlensankem explorativestudyonthevalidityofvariousdefinitionsofa22ctemperaturethresholdaswarningsignalforimpendingdiabeticfootulceration
AT hollowaysamantha explorativestudyonthevalidityofvariousdefinitionsofa22ctemperaturethresholdaswarningsignalforimpendingdiabeticfootulceration
AT bussiccoa explorativestudyonthevalidityofvariousdefinitionsofa22ctemperaturethresholdaswarningsignalforimpendingdiabeticfootulceration
AT vannettenjaapj explorativestudyonthevalidityofvariousdefinitionsofa22ctemperaturethresholdaswarningsignalforimpendingdiabeticfootulceration