Cargando…

Antimicrobial dressing efficacy against mature Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm on porcine skin explants

An ex vivo porcine skin explant biofilm model that preserves key properties of biofilm attached to skin at different levels of maturity (0–3 days) was used to assess the efficacy of commercially available antimicrobial dressings and topical treatments. Assays were also performed on the subpopulation...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Phillips, Priscilla L, Yang, Qingping, Davis, Stephen, Sampson, Edith M, Azeke, John I, Hamad, Afifa, Schultz, Gregory S
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7950379/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24028432
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.12142
_version_ 1783663566902001664
author Phillips, Priscilla L
Yang, Qingping
Davis, Stephen
Sampson, Edith M
Azeke, John I
Hamad, Afifa
Schultz, Gregory S
author_facet Phillips, Priscilla L
Yang, Qingping
Davis, Stephen
Sampson, Edith M
Azeke, John I
Hamad, Afifa
Schultz, Gregory S
author_sort Phillips, Priscilla L
collection PubMed
description An ex vivo porcine skin explant biofilm model that preserves key properties of biofilm attached to skin at different levels of maturity (0–3 days) was used to assess the efficacy of commercially available antimicrobial dressings and topical treatments. Assays were also performed on the subpopulation of antibiotic tolerant biofilm generated by 24 hours of pre‐treatment with gentamicin (120× minimal inhibitory concentration) prior to agent exposure. Five types of antimicrobial agents (iodine, silver, polyhexamethylene biguanide, honey and ethanol) and four types of moisture dressings (cotton gauze, sodium carboxymethylcellulose fibre, calcium alginate fibre and cadexomer beads) were assessed. Time‐release silver gel and cadexomer iodine dressings were the most effective in reducing mature biofilm [between 5 and 7 logarithmic (log) of 7‐log total], whereas all other dressing formulations reduced biofilm between 0·3 and 2 log in 24 or 72 hours with a single exposure. Similar results were found after 24‐hour exposure to silver release dressings using an in vivo pig burn wound model, demonstrating correlation between the ex vivo and in vivo models. Results of this study indicate that commonly used microbicidal wound dressings vary widely in their ability to kill mature biofilm and the efficacy is influenced by time of exposure, number of applications, moisture level and agent formulation (sustained release).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7950379
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79503792021-07-02 Antimicrobial dressing efficacy against mature Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm on porcine skin explants Phillips, Priscilla L Yang, Qingping Davis, Stephen Sampson, Edith M Azeke, John I Hamad, Afifa Schultz, Gregory S Int Wound J Original Articles An ex vivo porcine skin explant biofilm model that preserves key properties of biofilm attached to skin at different levels of maturity (0–3 days) was used to assess the efficacy of commercially available antimicrobial dressings and topical treatments. Assays were also performed on the subpopulation of antibiotic tolerant biofilm generated by 24 hours of pre‐treatment with gentamicin (120× minimal inhibitory concentration) prior to agent exposure. Five types of antimicrobial agents (iodine, silver, polyhexamethylene biguanide, honey and ethanol) and four types of moisture dressings (cotton gauze, sodium carboxymethylcellulose fibre, calcium alginate fibre and cadexomer beads) were assessed. Time‐release silver gel and cadexomer iodine dressings were the most effective in reducing mature biofilm [between 5 and 7 logarithmic (log) of 7‐log total], whereas all other dressing formulations reduced biofilm between 0·3 and 2 log in 24 or 72 hours with a single exposure. Similar results were found after 24‐hour exposure to silver release dressings using an in vivo pig burn wound model, demonstrating correlation between the ex vivo and in vivo models. Results of this study indicate that commonly used microbicidal wound dressings vary widely in their ability to kill mature biofilm and the efficacy is influenced by time of exposure, number of applications, moisture level and agent formulation (sustained release). Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2013-09-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7950379/ /pubmed/24028432 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.12142 Text en © 2013 The Authors. International Wound Journal published by Medicalhelplines.com Inc and John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Phillips, Priscilla L
Yang, Qingping
Davis, Stephen
Sampson, Edith M
Azeke, John I
Hamad, Afifa
Schultz, Gregory S
Antimicrobial dressing efficacy against mature Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm on porcine skin explants
title Antimicrobial dressing efficacy against mature Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm on porcine skin explants
title_full Antimicrobial dressing efficacy against mature Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm on porcine skin explants
title_fullStr Antimicrobial dressing efficacy against mature Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm on porcine skin explants
title_full_unstemmed Antimicrobial dressing efficacy against mature Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm on porcine skin explants
title_short Antimicrobial dressing efficacy against mature Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm on porcine skin explants
title_sort antimicrobial dressing efficacy against mature pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm on porcine skin explants
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7950379/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24028432
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.12142
work_keys_str_mv AT phillipspriscillal antimicrobialdressingefficacyagainstmaturepseudomonasaeruginosabiofilmonporcineskinexplants
AT yangqingping antimicrobialdressingefficacyagainstmaturepseudomonasaeruginosabiofilmonporcineskinexplants
AT davisstephen antimicrobialdressingefficacyagainstmaturepseudomonasaeruginosabiofilmonporcineskinexplants
AT sampsonedithm antimicrobialdressingefficacyagainstmaturepseudomonasaeruginosabiofilmonporcineskinexplants
AT azekejohni antimicrobialdressingefficacyagainstmaturepseudomonasaeruginosabiofilmonporcineskinexplants
AT hamadafifa antimicrobialdressingefficacyagainstmaturepseudomonasaeruginosabiofilmonporcineskinexplants
AT schultzgregorys antimicrobialdressingefficacyagainstmaturepseudomonasaeruginosabiofilmonporcineskinexplants