Cargando…

A prospective, randomised, controlled, multi‐centre comparative effectiveness study of healing using dehydrated human amnion/chorion membrane allograft, bioengineered skin substitute or standard of care for treatment of chronic lower extremity diabetic ulcers

A prospective, randomised, controlled, parallel group, multi‐centre clinical trial was conducted at three sites to compare the healing effectiveness of treatment of chronic lower extremity diabetic ulcers with either weekly applications of Apligraf(®) (Organogenesis, Inc., Canton, MA), EpiFix (®) (M...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zelen, Charles M, Gould, Lisa, Serena, Thomas E, Carter, Marissa J, Keller, Jennifer, Li, William W
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7950807/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25424146
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.12395
_version_ 1783663573505933312
author Zelen, Charles M
Gould, Lisa
Serena, Thomas E
Carter, Marissa J
Keller, Jennifer
Li, William W
author_facet Zelen, Charles M
Gould, Lisa
Serena, Thomas E
Carter, Marissa J
Keller, Jennifer
Li, William W
author_sort Zelen, Charles M
collection PubMed
description A prospective, randomised, controlled, parallel group, multi‐centre clinical trial was conducted at three sites to compare the healing effectiveness of treatment of chronic lower extremity diabetic ulcers with either weekly applications of Apligraf(®) (Organogenesis, Inc., Canton, MA), EpiFix (®) (MiMedx Group, Inc., Marietta, GA), or standard wound care with collagen‐alginate dressing. The primary study outcome was the percent change in complete wound healing after 4 and 6 weeks of treatment. Secondary outcomes included percent change in wound area per week, velocity of wound closure and a calculation of the amount and cost of Apligraf or EpiFix used. A total of 65 subjects entered the 2‐week run‐in period and 60 were randomised (20 per group). The proportion of patients in the EpiFix group achieving complete wound closure within 4 and 6 weeks was 85% and 95%, significantly higher (all adjusted P‐values ≤ 0·003) than for patients receiving Apligraf (35% and 45%), or standard care (30% and 35%). After 1 week, wounds treated with EpiFix had reduced in area by 83·5% compared with 53·1% for wounds treated with Apligraf. Median time to healing was significantly faster (all adjusted P‐values ≤0·001) with EpiFix (13 days) compared to Apligraf (49 days) or standard care (49 days). The mean number of grafts used and the graft cost per patient were lower in the EpiFix group campared to the Apligraf group, at 2·15 grafts at a cost of $1669 versus 6·2 grafts at a cost of $9216, respectively. The results of this study demonstrate the clinical and resource utilisation superiority of EpiFix compared to Apligraf or standard of care, for the treatment of diabetic ulcers of the lower extremities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7950807
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79508072021-07-02 A prospective, randomised, controlled, multi‐centre comparative effectiveness study of healing using dehydrated human amnion/chorion membrane allograft, bioengineered skin substitute or standard of care for treatment of chronic lower extremity diabetic ulcers Zelen, Charles M Gould, Lisa Serena, Thomas E Carter, Marissa J Keller, Jennifer Li, William W Int Wound J Original Articles A prospective, randomised, controlled, parallel group, multi‐centre clinical trial was conducted at three sites to compare the healing effectiveness of treatment of chronic lower extremity diabetic ulcers with either weekly applications of Apligraf(®) (Organogenesis, Inc., Canton, MA), EpiFix (®) (MiMedx Group, Inc., Marietta, GA), or standard wound care with collagen‐alginate dressing. The primary study outcome was the percent change in complete wound healing after 4 and 6 weeks of treatment. Secondary outcomes included percent change in wound area per week, velocity of wound closure and a calculation of the amount and cost of Apligraf or EpiFix used. A total of 65 subjects entered the 2‐week run‐in period and 60 were randomised (20 per group). The proportion of patients in the EpiFix group achieving complete wound closure within 4 and 6 weeks was 85% and 95%, significantly higher (all adjusted P‐values ≤ 0·003) than for patients receiving Apligraf (35% and 45%), or standard care (30% and 35%). After 1 week, wounds treated with EpiFix had reduced in area by 83·5% compared with 53·1% for wounds treated with Apligraf. Median time to healing was significantly faster (all adjusted P‐values ≤0·001) with EpiFix (13 days) compared to Apligraf (49 days) or standard care (49 days). The mean number of grafts used and the graft cost per patient were lower in the EpiFix group campared to the Apligraf group, at 2·15 grafts at a cost of $1669 versus 6·2 grafts at a cost of $9216, respectively. The results of this study demonstrate the clinical and resource utilisation superiority of EpiFix compared to Apligraf or standard of care, for the treatment of diabetic ulcers of the lower extremities. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2014-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7950807/ /pubmed/25424146 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.12395 Text en © 2014 The Authors. International Wound Journal published by Medicalhelplines.com Inc and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Zelen, Charles M
Gould, Lisa
Serena, Thomas E
Carter, Marissa J
Keller, Jennifer
Li, William W
A prospective, randomised, controlled, multi‐centre comparative effectiveness study of healing using dehydrated human amnion/chorion membrane allograft, bioengineered skin substitute or standard of care for treatment of chronic lower extremity diabetic ulcers
title A prospective, randomised, controlled, multi‐centre comparative effectiveness study of healing using dehydrated human amnion/chorion membrane allograft, bioengineered skin substitute or standard of care for treatment of chronic lower extremity diabetic ulcers
title_full A prospective, randomised, controlled, multi‐centre comparative effectiveness study of healing using dehydrated human amnion/chorion membrane allograft, bioengineered skin substitute or standard of care for treatment of chronic lower extremity diabetic ulcers
title_fullStr A prospective, randomised, controlled, multi‐centre comparative effectiveness study of healing using dehydrated human amnion/chorion membrane allograft, bioengineered skin substitute or standard of care for treatment of chronic lower extremity diabetic ulcers
title_full_unstemmed A prospective, randomised, controlled, multi‐centre comparative effectiveness study of healing using dehydrated human amnion/chorion membrane allograft, bioengineered skin substitute or standard of care for treatment of chronic lower extremity diabetic ulcers
title_short A prospective, randomised, controlled, multi‐centre comparative effectiveness study of healing using dehydrated human amnion/chorion membrane allograft, bioengineered skin substitute or standard of care for treatment of chronic lower extremity diabetic ulcers
title_sort prospective, randomised, controlled, multi‐centre comparative effectiveness study of healing using dehydrated human amnion/chorion membrane allograft, bioengineered skin substitute or standard of care for treatment of chronic lower extremity diabetic ulcers
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7950807/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25424146
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.12395
work_keys_str_mv AT zelencharlesm aprospectiverandomisedcontrolledmulticentrecomparativeeffectivenessstudyofhealingusingdehydratedhumanamnionchorionmembraneallograftbioengineeredskinsubstituteorstandardofcarefortreatmentofchroniclowerextremitydiabeticulcers
AT gouldlisa aprospectiverandomisedcontrolledmulticentrecomparativeeffectivenessstudyofhealingusingdehydratedhumanamnionchorionmembraneallograftbioengineeredskinsubstituteorstandardofcarefortreatmentofchroniclowerextremitydiabeticulcers
AT serenathomase aprospectiverandomisedcontrolledmulticentrecomparativeeffectivenessstudyofhealingusingdehydratedhumanamnionchorionmembraneallograftbioengineeredskinsubstituteorstandardofcarefortreatmentofchroniclowerextremitydiabeticulcers
AT cartermarissaj aprospectiverandomisedcontrolledmulticentrecomparativeeffectivenessstudyofhealingusingdehydratedhumanamnionchorionmembraneallograftbioengineeredskinsubstituteorstandardofcarefortreatmentofchroniclowerextremitydiabeticulcers
AT kellerjennifer aprospectiverandomisedcontrolledmulticentrecomparativeeffectivenessstudyofhealingusingdehydratedhumanamnionchorionmembraneallograftbioengineeredskinsubstituteorstandardofcarefortreatmentofchroniclowerextremitydiabeticulcers
AT liwilliamw aprospectiverandomisedcontrolledmulticentrecomparativeeffectivenessstudyofhealingusingdehydratedhumanamnionchorionmembraneallograftbioengineeredskinsubstituteorstandardofcarefortreatmentofchroniclowerextremitydiabeticulcers
AT zelencharlesm prospectiverandomisedcontrolledmulticentrecomparativeeffectivenessstudyofhealingusingdehydratedhumanamnionchorionmembraneallograftbioengineeredskinsubstituteorstandardofcarefortreatmentofchroniclowerextremitydiabeticulcers
AT gouldlisa prospectiverandomisedcontrolledmulticentrecomparativeeffectivenessstudyofhealingusingdehydratedhumanamnionchorionmembraneallograftbioengineeredskinsubstituteorstandardofcarefortreatmentofchroniclowerextremitydiabeticulcers
AT serenathomase prospectiverandomisedcontrolledmulticentrecomparativeeffectivenessstudyofhealingusingdehydratedhumanamnionchorionmembraneallograftbioengineeredskinsubstituteorstandardofcarefortreatmentofchroniclowerextremitydiabeticulcers
AT cartermarissaj prospectiverandomisedcontrolledmulticentrecomparativeeffectivenessstudyofhealingusingdehydratedhumanamnionchorionmembraneallograftbioengineeredskinsubstituteorstandardofcarefortreatmentofchroniclowerextremitydiabeticulcers
AT kellerjennifer prospectiverandomisedcontrolledmulticentrecomparativeeffectivenessstudyofhealingusingdehydratedhumanamnionchorionmembraneallograftbioengineeredskinsubstituteorstandardofcarefortreatmentofchroniclowerextremitydiabeticulcers
AT liwilliamw prospectiverandomisedcontrolledmulticentrecomparativeeffectivenessstudyofhealingusingdehydratedhumanamnionchorionmembraneallograftbioengineeredskinsubstituteorstandardofcarefortreatmentofchroniclowerextremitydiabeticulcers