Cargando…
Implementing high value back pain care in private physiotherapy in Australia: A qualitative evaluation of physiotherapists who participated in an “implementation to innovation” system
Objectives: Many barriers exist to delivering high-value care for people with low back pain (LBP). We have developed a multistrategy implementation system to overcome these barriers. Here we describe a qualitative evaluation of the experiences of private-sector physiotherapists implementing the syst...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7951159/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33987488 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/24740527.2020.1732808 |
_version_ | 1783663597655687168 |
---|---|
author | Gardner, Claire Moseley, G. Lorimer Karran, Emma L. Wiles, Louise K. Hibbert, Peter |
author_facet | Gardner, Claire Moseley, G. Lorimer Karran, Emma L. Wiles, Louise K. Hibbert, Peter |
author_sort | Gardner, Claire |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objectives: Many barriers exist to delivering high-value care for people with low back pain (LBP). We have developed a multistrategy implementation system to overcome these barriers. Here we describe a qualitative evaluation of the experiences of private-sector physiotherapists implementing the system. Design: PRISM (Practice-based innovation and implementation system) is an iterative clinician-as-scientist implementation program, tailored here for acute and subacute LBP. PRISM integrates strategies from behavioral change, implementation, and educational science fields. Semistructured interviews, group discussion forums, and electronic questionnaires were used to collect data at multiple time points that were then analyzed using an interpretative descriptive approach. Participants: Six physiotherapists (purposive sample) practicing in private practice physiotherapy clinics in the Adelaide region, South Australia, were enrolled in the study. Interventions: Interventions included an educational pain science and care workshop incorporating self-regulated learning principles, a co-planned clinical pathway, an electronic decision support tool, development and support of a community of practice, case study simulations, audit and feedback, and collaborative problem solving and innovation for physiotherapists. Results: Participants’ experiences and perceptions centered around five themes: (1) knowledge and skills training; (2) networking and mentoring; (3) a clear clinical pathway; (4) practical tools; and (5) data feedback. Participants appraised the implementation process positively but identified patient receptiveness as a challenge at times. Suggestions for improvement included streamlining/automating data collection forms and processes and providing more simulation opportunities. Conclusions: PRISM appears to be a promising approach to overcoming several barriers that prevent people with back pain from receiving high-value care. It consolidates and increases pain science knowledge and increases physiotherapist confidence in delivering high-value care. It appears to legitimize some current practices, enhance clinical reasoning and communication skills, extend knowledge in line with contemporary pain science, and facilitate the application of a biopsychosocial management approach. The high-level acceptance by participants provides a foundation for further research to test outcomes and delivery in different settings. Contribution of the article: A quality improvement intervention designed to improve delivery of high-value care was well received by private practice physiotherapists. Physiotherapists particularly valued using experiential learning to improve fluency in communicating with, and educating patients about, contemporary pain science. A structured clinical pathway and tools guided physiotherapists on the basic elements of necessary care and allowed them to concentrate on higher levels of decision making and communication with patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7951159 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Taylor & Francis |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79511592021-05-12 Implementing high value back pain care in private physiotherapy in Australia: A qualitative evaluation of physiotherapists who participated in an “implementation to innovation” system Gardner, Claire Moseley, G. Lorimer Karran, Emma L. Wiles, Louise K. Hibbert, Peter Can J Pain Research Article Objectives: Many barriers exist to delivering high-value care for people with low back pain (LBP). We have developed a multistrategy implementation system to overcome these barriers. Here we describe a qualitative evaluation of the experiences of private-sector physiotherapists implementing the system. Design: PRISM (Practice-based innovation and implementation system) is an iterative clinician-as-scientist implementation program, tailored here for acute and subacute LBP. PRISM integrates strategies from behavioral change, implementation, and educational science fields. Semistructured interviews, group discussion forums, and electronic questionnaires were used to collect data at multiple time points that were then analyzed using an interpretative descriptive approach. Participants: Six physiotherapists (purposive sample) practicing in private practice physiotherapy clinics in the Adelaide region, South Australia, were enrolled in the study. Interventions: Interventions included an educational pain science and care workshop incorporating self-regulated learning principles, a co-planned clinical pathway, an electronic decision support tool, development and support of a community of practice, case study simulations, audit and feedback, and collaborative problem solving and innovation for physiotherapists. Results: Participants’ experiences and perceptions centered around five themes: (1) knowledge and skills training; (2) networking and mentoring; (3) a clear clinical pathway; (4) practical tools; and (5) data feedback. Participants appraised the implementation process positively but identified patient receptiveness as a challenge at times. Suggestions for improvement included streamlining/automating data collection forms and processes and providing more simulation opportunities. Conclusions: PRISM appears to be a promising approach to overcoming several barriers that prevent people with back pain from receiving high-value care. It consolidates and increases pain science knowledge and increases physiotherapist confidence in delivering high-value care. It appears to legitimize some current practices, enhance clinical reasoning and communication skills, extend knowledge in line with contemporary pain science, and facilitate the application of a biopsychosocial management approach. The high-level acceptance by participants provides a foundation for further research to test outcomes and delivery in different settings. Contribution of the article: A quality improvement intervention designed to improve delivery of high-value care was well received by private practice physiotherapists. Physiotherapists particularly valued using experiential learning to improve fluency in communicating with, and educating patients about, contemporary pain science. A structured clinical pathway and tools guided physiotherapists on the basic elements of necessary care and allowed them to concentrate on higher levels of decision making and communication with patients. Taylor & Francis 2020-05-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7951159/ /pubmed/33987488 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/24740527.2020.1732808 Text en © 2020 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Gardner, Claire Moseley, G. Lorimer Karran, Emma L. Wiles, Louise K. Hibbert, Peter Implementing high value back pain care in private physiotherapy in Australia: A qualitative evaluation of physiotherapists who participated in an “implementation to innovation” system |
title | Implementing high value back pain care in private physiotherapy in Australia: A qualitative evaluation of physiotherapists who participated in an “implementation to innovation” system |
title_full | Implementing high value back pain care in private physiotherapy in Australia: A qualitative evaluation of physiotherapists who participated in an “implementation to innovation” system |
title_fullStr | Implementing high value back pain care in private physiotherapy in Australia: A qualitative evaluation of physiotherapists who participated in an “implementation to innovation” system |
title_full_unstemmed | Implementing high value back pain care in private physiotherapy in Australia: A qualitative evaluation of physiotherapists who participated in an “implementation to innovation” system |
title_short | Implementing high value back pain care in private physiotherapy in Australia: A qualitative evaluation of physiotherapists who participated in an “implementation to innovation” system |
title_sort | implementing high value back pain care in private physiotherapy in australia: a qualitative evaluation of physiotherapists who participated in an “implementation to innovation” system |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7951159/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33987488 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/24740527.2020.1732808 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gardnerclaire implementinghighvaluebackpaincareinprivatephysiotherapyinaustraliaaqualitativeevaluationofphysiotherapistswhoparticipatedinanimplementationtoinnovationsystem AT moseleyglorimer implementinghighvaluebackpaincareinprivatephysiotherapyinaustraliaaqualitativeevaluationofphysiotherapistswhoparticipatedinanimplementationtoinnovationsystem AT karranemmal implementinghighvaluebackpaincareinprivatephysiotherapyinaustraliaaqualitativeevaluationofphysiotherapistswhoparticipatedinanimplementationtoinnovationsystem AT wileslouisek implementinghighvaluebackpaincareinprivatephysiotherapyinaustraliaaqualitativeevaluationofphysiotherapistswhoparticipatedinanimplementationtoinnovationsystem AT hibbertpeter implementinghighvaluebackpaincareinprivatephysiotherapyinaustraliaaqualitativeevaluationofphysiotherapistswhoparticipatedinanimplementationtoinnovationsystem |