Cargando…

Trends and gaps in the use of citizen science derived data as input for species distribution models: A quantitative review

Citizen science (CS) currently refers to the participation of non-scientist volunteers in any discipline of conventional scientific research. Over the last two decades, nature-based CS has flourished due to innovative technology, novel devices, and widespread digital platforms used to collect and cl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Feldman, Mariano J., Imbeau, Louis, Marchand, Philippe, Mazerolle, Marc J., Darveau, Marcel, Fenton, Nicole J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7951830/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33705414
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234587
_version_ 1783663610672709632
author Feldman, Mariano J.
Imbeau, Louis
Marchand, Philippe
Mazerolle, Marc J.
Darveau, Marcel
Fenton, Nicole J.
author_facet Feldman, Mariano J.
Imbeau, Louis
Marchand, Philippe
Mazerolle, Marc J.
Darveau, Marcel
Fenton, Nicole J.
author_sort Feldman, Mariano J.
collection PubMed
description Citizen science (CS) currently refers to the participation of non-scientist volunteers in any discipline of conventional scientific research. Over the last two decades, nature-based CS has flourished due to innovative technology, novel devices, and widespread digital platforms used to collect and classify species occurrence data. For scientists, CS offers a low-cost approach of collecting species occurrence information at large spatial scales that otherwise would be prohibitively expensive. We examined the trends and gaps linked to the use of CS as a source of data for species distribution models (SDMs), in order to propose guidelines and highlight solutions. We conducted a quantitative literature review of 207 peer-reviewed articles to measure how the representation of different taxa, regions, and data types have changed in SDM publications since the 2010s. Our review shows that the number of papers using CS for SDMs has increased at approximately double the rate of the overall number of SDM papers. However, disparities in taxonomic and geographic coverage remain in studies using CS. Western Europe and North America were the regions with the most coverage (73%). Papers on birds (49%) and mammals (19.3%) outnumbered other taxa. Among invertebrates, flying insects including Lepidoptera, Odonata and Hymenoptera received the most attention. Discrepancies between research interest and availability of data were as especially important for amphibians, reptiles and fishes. Compared to studies on animal taxa, papers on plants using CS data remain rare. Although the aims and scope of papers are diverse, species conservation remained the central theme of SDM using CS data. We present examples of the use of CS and highlight recommendations to motivate further research, such as combining multiple data sources and promoting local and traditional knowledge. We hope our findings will strengthen citizen-researchers partnerships to better inform SDMs, especially for less-studied taxa and regions. Researchers stand to benefit from the large quantity of data available from CS sources to improve global predictions of species distributions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7951830
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79518302021-03-22 Trends and gaps in the use of citizen science derived data as input for species distribution models: A quantitative review Feldman, Mariano J. Imbeau, Louis Marchand, Philippe Mazerolle, Marc J. Darveau, Marcel Fenton, Nicole J. PLoS One Research Article Citizen science (CS) currently refers to the participation of non-scientist volunteers in any discipline of conventional scientific research. Over the last two decades, nature-based CS has flourished due to innovative technology, novel devices, and widespread digital platforms used to collect and classify species occurrence data. For scientists, CS offers a low-cost approach of collecting species occurrence information at large spatial scales that otherwise would be prohibitively expensive. We examined the trends and gaps linked to the use of CS as a source of data for species distribution models (SDMs), in order to propose guidelines and highlight solutions. We conducted a quantitative literature review of 207 peer-reviewed articles to measure how the representation of different taxa, regions, and data types have changed in SDM publications since the 2010s. Our review shows that the number of papers using CS for SDMs has increased at approximately double the rate of the overall number of SDM papers. However, disparities in taxonomic and geographic coverage remain in studies using CS. Western Europe and North America were the regions with the most coverage (73%). Papers on birds (49%) and mammals (19.3%) outnumbered other taxa. Among invertebrates, flying insects including Lepidoptera, Odonata and Hymenoptera received the most attention. Discrepancies between research interest and availability of data were as especially important for amphibians, reptiles and fishes. Compared to studies on animal taxa, papers on plants using CS data remain rare. Although the aims and scope of papers are diverse, species conservation remained the central theme of SDM using CS data. We present examples of the use of CS and highlight recommendations to motivate further research, such as combining multiple data sources and promoting local and traditional knowledge. We hope our findings will strengthen citizen-researchers partnerships to better inform SDMs, especially for less-studied taxa and regions. Researchers stand to benefit from the large quantity of data available from CS sources to improve global predictions of species distributions. Public Library of Science 2021-03-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7951830/ /pubmed/33705414 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234587 Text en © 2021 Feldman et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Feldman, Mariano J.
Imbeau, Louis
Marchand, Philippe
Mazerolle, Marc J.
Darveau, Marcel
Fenton, Nicole J.
Trends and gaps in the use of citizen science derived data as input for species distribution models: A quantitative review
title Trends and gaps in the use of citizen science derived data as input for species distribution models: A quantitative review
title_full Trends and gaps in the use of citizen science derived data as input for species distribution models: A quantitative review
title_fullStr Trends and gaps in the use of citizen science derived data as input for species distribution models: A quantitative review
title_full_unstemmed Trends and gaps in the use of citizen science derived data as input for species distribution models: A quantitative review
title_short Trends and gaps in the use of citizen science derived data as input for species distribution models: A quantitative review
title_sort trends and gaps in the use of citizen science derived data as input for species distribution models: a quantitative review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7951830/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33705414
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234587
work_keys_str_mv AT feldmanmarianoj trendsandgapsintheuseofcitizensciencederiveddataasinputforspeciesdistributionmodelsaquantitativereview
AT imbeaulouis trendsandgapsintheuseofcitizensciencederiveddataasinputforspeciesdistributionmodelsaquantitativereview
AT marchandphilippe trendsandgapsintheuseofcitizensciencederiveddataasinputforspeciesdistributionmodelsaquantitativereview
AT mazerollemarcj trendsandgapsintheuseofcitizensciencederiveddataasinputforspeciesdistributionmodelsaquantitativereview
AT darveaumarcel trendsandgapsintheuseofcitizensciencederiveddataasinputforspeciesdistributionmodelsaquantitativereview
AT fentonnicolej trendsandgapsintheuseofcitizensciencederiveddataasinputforspeciesdistributionmodelsaquantitativereview