Cargando…
Trends and gaps in the use of citizen science derived data as input for species distribution models: A quantitative review
Citizen science (CS) currently refers to the participation of non-scientist volunteers in any discipline of conventional scientific research. Over the last two decades, nature-based CS has flourished due to innovative technology, novel devices, and widespread digital platforms used to collect and cl...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7951830/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33705414 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234587 |
_version_ | 1783663610672709632 |
---|---|
author | Feldman, Mariano J. Imbeau, Louis Marchand, Philippe Mazerolle, Marc J. Darveau, Marcel Fenton, Nicole J. |
author_facet | Feldman, Mariano J. Imbeau, Louis Marchand, Philippe Mazerolle, Marc J. Darveau, Marcel Fenton, Nicole J. |
author_sort | Feldman, Mariano J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Citizen science (CS) currently refers to the participation of non-scientist volunteers in any discipline of conventional scientific research. Over the last two decades, nature-based CS has flourished due to innovative technology, novel devices, and widespread digital platforms used to collect and classify species occurrence data. For scientists, CS offers a low-cost approach of collecting species occurrence information at large spatial scales that otherwise would be prohibitively expensive. We examined the trends and gaps linked to the use of CS as a source of data for species distribution models (SDMs), in order to propose guidelines and highlight solutions. We conducted a quantitative literature review of 207 peer-reviewed articles to measure how the representation of different taxa, regions, and data types have changed in SDM publications since the 2010s. Our review shows that the number of papers using CS for SDMs has increased at approximately double the rate of the overall number of SDM papers. However, disparities in taxonomic and geographic coverage remain in studies using CS. Western Europe and North America were the regions with the most coverage (73%). Papers on birds (49%) and mammals (19.3%) outnumbered other taxa. Among invertebrates, flying insects including Lepidoptera, Odonata and Hymenoptera received the most attention. Discrepancies between research interest and availability of data were as especially important for amphibians, reptiles and fishes. Compared to studies on animal taxa, papers on plants using CS data remain rare. Although the aims and scope of papers are diverse, species conservation remained the central theme of SDM using CS data. We present examples of the use of CS and highlight recommendations to motivate further research, such as combining multiple data sources and promoting local and traditional knowledge. We hope our findings will strengthen citizen-researchers partnerships to better inform SDMs, especially for less-studied taxa and regions. Researchers stand to benefit from the large quantity of data available from CS sources to improve global predictions of species distributions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7951830 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79518302021-03-22 Trends and gaps in the use of citizen science derived data as input for species distribution models: A quantitative review Feldman, Mariano J. Imbeau, Louis Marchand, Philippe Mazerolle, Marc J. Darveau, Marcel Fenton, Nicole J. PLoS One Research Article Citizen science (CS) currently refers to the participation of non-scientist volunteers in any discipline of conventional scientific research. Over the last two decades, nature-based CS has flourished due to innovative technology, novel devices, and widespread digital platforms used to collect and classify species occurrence data. For scientists, CS offers a low-cost approach of collecting species occurrence information at large spatial scales that otherwise would be prohibitively expensive. We examined the trends and gaps linked to the use of CS as a source of data for species distribution models (SDMs), in order to propose guidelines and highlight solutions. We conducted a quantitative literature review of 207 peer-reviewed articles to measure how the representation of different taxa, regions, and data types have changed in SDM publications since the 2010s. Our review shows that the number of papers using CS for SDMs has increased at approximately double the rate of the overall number of SDM papers. However, disparities in taxonomic and geographic coverage remain in studies using CS. Western Europe and North America were the regions with the most coverage (73%). Papers on birds (49%) and mammals (19.3%) outnumbered other taxa. Among invertebrates, flying insects including Lepidoptera, Odonata and Hymenoptera received the most attention. Discrepancies between research interest and availability of data were as especially important for amphibians, reptiles and fishes. Compared to studies on animal taxa, papers on plants using CS data remain rare. Although the aims and scope of papers are diverse, species conservation remained the central theme of SDM using CS data. We present examples of the use of CS and highlight recommendations to motivate further research, such as combining multiple data sources and promoting local and traditional knowledge. We hope our findings will strengthen citizen-researchers partnerships to better inform SDMs, especially for less-studied taxa and regions. Researchers stand to benefit from the large quantity of data available from CS sources to improve global predictions of species distributions. Public Library of Science 2021-03-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7951830/ /pubmed/33705414 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234587 Text en © 2021 Feldman et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Feldman, Mariano J. Imbeau, Louis Marchand, Philippe Mazerolle, Marc J. Darveau, Marcel Fenton, Nicole J. Trends and gaps in the use of citizen science derived data as input for species distribution models: A quantitative review |
title | Trends and gaps in the use of citizen science derived data as input for species distribution models: A quantitative review |
title_full | Trends and gaps in the use of citizen science derived data as input for species distribution models: A quantitative review |
title_fullStr | Trends and gaps in the use of citizen science derived data as input for species distribution models: A quantitative review |
title_full_unstemmed | Trends and gaps in the use of citizen science derived data as input for species distribution models: A quantitative review |
title_short | Trends and gaps in the use of citizen science derived data as input for species distribution models: A quantitative review |
title_sort | trends and gaps in the use of citizen science derived data as input for species distribution models: a quantitative review |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7951830/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33705414 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234587 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT feldmanmarianoj trendsandgapsintheuseofcitizensciencederiveddataasinputforspeciesdistributionmodelsaquantitativereview AT imbeaulouis trendsandgapsintheuseofcitizensciencederiveddataasinputforspeciesdistributionmodelsaquantitativereview AT marchandphilippe trendsandgapsintheuseofcitizensciencederiveddataasinputforspeciesdistributionmodelsaquantitativereview AT mazerollemarcj trendsandgapsintheuseofcitizensciencederiveddataasinputforspeciesdistributionmodelsaquantitativereview AT darveaumarcel trendsandgapsintheuseofcitizensciencederiveddataasinputforspeciesdistributionmodelsaquantitativereview AT fentonnicolej trendsandgapsintheuseofcitizensciencederiveddataasinputforspeciesdistributionmodelsaquantitativereview |