Cargando…

Robustness of a Combined Modified Dixon and PROPELLER Sequence with Two Interleaved Echoes in Clinical Head and Neck MRI

PURPOSE: The combination of modified Dixon (mDixon) and periodically rotated overlapping parallel lines with enhanced reconstruction sequence with two interleaved echoes, which promotes uniform fat-suppression and motion insensitivity, has recently become available for commercial magnetic resonance...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shigenaga, Yutaka, Takenaka, Daisuke, Hashimoto, Tomohisa, Ishida, Takayuki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Japanese Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7952203/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32269186
http://dx.doi.org/10.2463/mrms.mp.2019-0161
_version_ 1783663676774940672
author Shigenaga, Yutaka
Takenaka, Daisuke
Hashimoto, Tomohisa
Ishida, Takayuki
author_facet Shigenaga, Yutaka
Takenaka, Daisuke
Hashimoto, Tomohisa
Ishida, Takayuki
author_sort Shigenaga, Yutaka
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The combination of modified Dixon (mDixon) and periodically rotated overlapping parallel lines with enhanced reconstruction sequence with two interleaved echoes, which promotes uniform fat-suppression and motion insensitivity, has recently become available for commercial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanners. To compare the robustness of this combination sequence with that of standard Cartesian mDixon sequence for fat-suppressed T(2)-weighted imaging in clinical head and neck MRI. METHODS: Fifty patients with head and neck tumors were involved this study. All patients underwent MRI using both the combination and standard sequences. Two radiologists independently scored motion artifacts and water–fat separation error using a 4-point scale (1, unacceptable; 4, excellent). Furthermore, comprehensive comparative evaluation was performed using a 5-point scale (1, substantially inferior; 5, substantially superior). Data were statistically analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. RESULTS: In the motion artifact assessment, ratings of 3 or 4 points were assigned to 45% (observer-1, 58.0%; observer-2, 32.0%) and 97% (100%; 94.0%) of images for the standard and combination sequences, respectively (P < 0.001). For the water–fat separation error assessment, ratings of 3 or 4 points were assigned to 100% (100%; 100%) and 85% (84.0%; 86.0%) of images, respectively (P < 0.001). In the comprehensive evaluation, of the 100 cases (observer-1, 50; observer-2, 50), 96 were rated at four or five points. In cases with slight or no motion artifacts and water–fat separation errors, the combination sequence was superior to the standard sequence in term of noise and sharpness, and equal in terms of contrast. CONCLUSION: Although water–fat separation errors increased significantly in the combination sequence, most of these were acceptable. The significantly decreased motion artifacts in the combination sequence significantly improved image quality overall.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7952203
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Japanese Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79522032021-03-16 Robustness of a Combined Modified Dixon and PROPELLER Sequence with Two Interleaved Echoes in Clinical Head and Neck MRI Shigenaga, Yutaka Takenaka, Daisuke Hashimoto, Tomohisa Ishida, Takayuki Magn Reson Med Sci Major Paper PURPOSE: The combination of modified Dixon (mDixon) and periodically rotated overlapping parallel lines with enhanced reconstruction sequence with two interleaved echoes, which promotes uniform fat-suppression and motion insensitivity, has recently become available for commercial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanners. To compare the robustness of this combination sequence with that of standard Cartesian mDixon sequence for fat-suppressed T(2)-weighted imaging in clinical head and neck MRI. METHODS: Fifty patients with head and neck tumors were involved this study. All patients underwent MRI using both the combination and standard sequences. Two radiologists independently scored motion artifacts and water–fat separation error using a 4-point scale (1, unacceptable; 4, excellent). Furthermore, comprehensive comparative evaluation was performed using a 5-point scale (1, substantially inferior; 5, substantially superior). Data were statistically analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. RESULTS: In the motion artifact assessment, ratings of 3 or 4 points were assigned to 45% (observer-1, 58.0%; observer-2, 32.0%) and 97% (100%; 94.0%) of images for the standard and combination sequences, respectively (P < 0.001). For the water–fat separation error assessment, ratings of 3 or 4 points were assigned to 100% (100%; 100%) and 85% (84.0%; 86.0%) of images, respectively (P < 0.001). In the comprehensive evaluation, of the 100 cases (observer-1, 50; observer-2, 50), 96 were rated at four or five points. In cases with slight or no motion artifacts and water–fat separation errors, the combination sequence was superior to the standard sequence in term of noise and sharpness, and equal in terms of contrast. CONCLUSION: Although water–fat separation errors increased significantly in the combination sequence, most of these were acceptable. The significantly decreased motion artifacts in the combination sequence significantly improved image quality overall. Japanese Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 2020-04-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7952203/ /pubmed/32269186 http://dx.doi.org/10.2463/mrms.mp.2019-0161 Text en © 2021 Japanese Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
spellingShingle Major Paper
Shigenaga, Yutaka
Takenaka, Daisuke
Hashimoto, Tomohisa
Ishida, Takayuki
Robustness of a Combined Modified Dixon and PROPELLER Sequence with Two Interleaved Echoes in Clinical Head and Neck MRI
title Robustness of a Combined Modified Dixon and PROPELLER Sequence with Two Interleaved Echoes in Clinical Head and Neck MRI
title_full Robustness of a Combined Modified Dixon and PROPELLER Sequence with Two Interleaved Echoes in Clinical Head and Neck MRI
title_fullStr Robustness of a Combined Modified Dixon and PROPELLER Sequence with Two Interleaved Echoes in Clinical Head and Neck MRI
title_full_unstemmed Robustness of a Combined Modified Dixon and PROPELLER Sequence with Two Interleaved Echoes in Clinical Head and Neck MRI
title_short Robustness of a Combined Modified Dixon and PROPELLER Sequence with Two Interleaved Echoes in Clinical Head and Neck MRI
title_sort robustness of a combined modified dixon and propeller sequence with two interleaved echoes in clinical head and neck mri
topic Major Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7952203/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32269186
http://dx.doi.org/10.2463/mrms.mp.2019-0161
work_keys_str_mv AT shigenagayutaka robustnessofacombinedmodifieddixonandpropellersequencewithtwointerleavedechoesinclinicalheadandneckmri
AT takenakadaisuke robustnessofacombinedmodifieddixonandpropellersequencewithtwointerleavedechoesinclinicalheadandneckmri
AT hashimototomohisa robustnessofacombinedmodifieddixonandpropellersequencewithtwointerleavedechoesinclinicalheadandneckmri
AT ishidatakayuki robustnessofacombinedmodifieddixonandpropellersequencewithtwointerleavedechoesinclinicalheadandneckmri